Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
2026 FIFA World Cup
25JUL

US holds Iran's 24-hour visa leash

3 min read
11:57UTC

Andrew Giuliani confirmed the US would not ease Iran's 24-hour arrival rule before Belgium; Iran filed a formal FIFA complaint alleging unequal treatment.

SportDeveloping
Key takeaway

Giuliani keeps Iran's same-day travel rule for Belgium; Iran's FIFA complaint creates a record, not a remedy.

Andrew Giuliani, executive director of The White House FIFA Task Force, said on 20 June the United States would not ease the travel restrictions on Iran's squad for their Belgium fixture, which kicks off on 21 June. 1 The players arrive in Los Angeles 24 hours before the match and fly the short hop back to Tijuana, Mexico, the same night, a protocol no other team at the tournament faces. Iran lodged a formal complaint with FIFA, football's 211-member governing body, arguing the arrangement breaches its equal-treatment obligations, and head coach Amir Ghalenoei called his side "the most oppressed team in the whole World Cup". 2

Giuliani made the call on the record, as the official the host government appointed to run its side of the tournament, which is why it lands where FIFA cannot reach. FIFA recognises national federations as its counterparties, not governments. No clause in the competition rules lets it waive US immigration law for a fixture, so Iran's complaint creates a paper trail rather than a remedy.

That the two US bodies run on separate tracks is shown by the one case that broke Iran's way. The State Department, not the Task Force, issued midfielder Mehdi Torabi a new multiple-entry Visa around 17 June, after his single-entry document expired following the New Zealand match , restoring his availability for both remaining group games. Visa issuance sits with the State Department; the matchday protocol sits with the Task Force. Giuliani called the position "dynamic" and said the 25 June Egypt fixture would be reviewed once Belgium had been played.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Every other national team at the 2026 World Cup can stay in the United States for the duration of their group campaign, using a base camp and travelling to each match city as needed. Iran cannot. Their squad crosses from Tijuana, Mexico into the US only on match days and must fly back the same night, a 27-minute flight. The 24-hour window means players sleep, train, play, and leave in a single day. This arrangement traces to two separate policies. The Trump administration's travel restrictions bar Iranian nationals from staying in the United States. The squad received special athlete visas allowing entry, but those visas are single-purpose and time-limited. Giuliani oversees the US government's World Cup coordination and declined to extend or ease those conditions for the Belgium match. FIFA's equal-treatment obligations are grounded in Article 4 of its statutes, which prohibit discrimination against member associations. Iran's formal complaint argues that no other team faces logistical conditions that affect preparation and recovery on match day. The fact that midfielder Torabi's single-entry visa lapsed after the New Zealand match {{EVREF:/t/2026-fifa-world-cup/24/iran-players-us-visa-runs-out/}} and required a new document illustrates how operationally complicated this arrangement is for Iran's coaching staff.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The structural cause runs deeper than the specific visa protocol. US sanctions on Iran, operating under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, restrict financial transactions between US entities and Iranian nationals. This means Iran's 8% supporter ticket allocation could not legally be transferred to Iranian fans via US-based ticketing processors, a legal constraint separate from the DHS visa regime.

The 24-hour protocol reflects a political decision, not a legal necessity: athlete visas for Iranian players could in principle be issued on standard tournament-accreditation terms. Giuliani's Task Force chose not to issue them that way.

The decision sits at the intersection of US-Iran sanctions enforcement, the White House's broader posture toward Tehran in the context of the ongoing conflict, and the Trump administration's use of the World Cup as a platform for demonstrating that posture publicly.

Iran has been based in Tijuana since 8 June, with 14 support staff still denied US entry entirely. The visa constraint on Torabi made explicit what had previously been implicit: the access chain extends to individual players as well as federation officials.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If FIFA's complaint mechanism has no practical remedy, the precedent normalises host-country access discrimination for future tournaments in politically complicated contexts.

    Long term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Iran's preparation for the Belgium match on 21 June includes no full-team training session on US soil the day before, a condition no other team faces.

    Immediate · Reported
  • Precedent

    Torabi's visa lapse, the first documented mid-tournament selection casualty from the access chain, creates a formal record that FIFA and future hosts will cite in negotiating tournament accreditation terms.

    Medium term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #25 · Records day: 1,000th match, 100th goal

Al Jazeera· 21 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Real Madrid
Real Madrid
Operating internally on the basis Rodri joins, according to David Ornstein's reporting, despite no talks having taken place with Manchester City. The gap between internal planning and actual negotiation is itself notable.
Manchester City
Manchester City
Unwilling to sell Rodri, with manager Enzo Maresca stating he returns to the club after back surgery. No club-to-club talks with Real Madrid are taking place, contradicting the framing of a deal in motion.
CONMEBOL
CONMEBOL
Backs the move to a 64-team 2030 tournament co-hosted across South America. Has not engaged publicly with FIFPRO's workload or heat-threshold objections drawn from this tournament's data.
FIFA
FIFA
Points to its 30 June technical and officiating reviews as the authoritative account of the tournament's football, including Collina's rejection of bias claims. Has not publicly responded to the renewed compensation call or disputed FIFPRO's heat-threshold figures.
FIFPRO
FIFPRO
Measures a four-degree gap between its own 28C postponement threshold and FIFA's 32C cooling-break trigger, breached in 19% of matches played. Cites a 70-83 match workload projection to oppose the 64-team 2030 format.
Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch
Documents 54 immigration-custody deaths before kickoff and two since, and revives the compensation duty FIFA's own advisers identified after Qatar 2022 and never acted on. Treats the pattern as unresolved FIFA liability, not a closed file.