Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
2026 FIFA World Cup
12JUN

AIC and AIAC become 30% swing bloc

4 min read
09:25UTC

Giancarlo Abete's LND 34% against Malagò's Serie A 18%. The players' union and coaches' association decide the race between them.

SportDeveloping
Key takeaway

The AIC and AIAC together hold 30%, which decides the FIGC race and the parliamentary reform file that follows.

Giancarlo Abete, a former FIGC president, commands the Lega Nazionale Dilettanti (LND, the amateur-leagues federation) 34% bloc in the federal council, with Lega Pro (Serie C) adding to his column . Giovanni Malagò's Serie A bloc is 18%. The Italian Footballers' Association (AIC, 20%) and Italian Association of Football Coaches (AIAC, 10%) together control 30%, which is where the arithmetic leaves the decision.

Malagò met both mid-April and described the outcomes as 'very positive'. Abete is holding the same meetings this week, per ANSA. Candidate declarations close on 13 May; the Federal Council votes on 22 June. The AIC is the players' union, AIAC the coaches' association, and both have been courted by every reform-minded candidate in Italian football for a decade without typically drawing this much attention. They are drawing it now because Gravina has left the next president a ledger neither the clubs nor the amateur leagues can close by themselves.

Gravina's 8 April report put Italian professional clubs' collective debt at €5.5 billion with annual losses above €730 million, and ranked Serie A 49th of 50 leagues globally for under-21 minutes at 1.9% . Malagò's three headline reforms, reinstatement of the Decreto Crescita tax break for foreign signings, repeal of the 2018 gambling-advertising ban, and a 1% levy on sports-betting turnover projected at €160 million a year, all require parliamentary votes. None can be enacted by federation resolution, which is why Serie A backed a CONI president with cross-bench access over a federation administrator without one.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Italy's football governing body (FIGC) elects its president through a points-weighted council. Think of it like a shareholders' vote where different types of clubs have different vote shares. The amateur leagues (LND) hold 34% of the vote and are backing Giancarlo Abete, a former FIGC president. The top professional league (Serie A) holds 18% and is backing Giovanni Malagò. The deciding votes sit with the players' union (AIC, 20%) and the coaches' union (AIAC, 10%) : 30% combined. Both unions have met both candidates in mid-April. Malagò described his AIC and AIAC meetings as 'very positive'; Abete held parallel meetings with the same blocs the same week. The key question is whether AIC and AIAC vote for Abete (who has governed FIGC before) or Malagò (who has the parliamentary contacts to push through the three legislative reforms Italian football needs). The election is 22 June.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The voting architecture of the FIGC Federal Council deliberately weights the amateur game heavily. LND's 34% bloc reflects Italian football's actual breadth: there are vastly more amateur clubs than professional ones. The Growth Decree's reinstatement : the item most aligned with professional-club interests : requires parliament precisely because the federation's own budget cannot fund it without fiscal legislation.

This creates the paradox at the heart of the election: the candidate best placed to deliver the clubs' legislative priorities is the one who does not emerge from the football establishment that controls most of the votes.

Decreta Crescita : the Growth Decree : originally offered a 50% tax exemption on salary for foreign residents returning to Italy, a mechanism Italian clubs exploited from 2019 to 2022 before it was partially withdrawn. Reinstatement would give Serie A clubs an immediate competitive advantage in signing talent returning from foreign leagues, directly addressing the 67.9% foreign-player dominance figure by making Italian-employed foreign players more competitively priced.

First Reported In

Update #8 · Three clocks running against kickoff

Sport Mediaset· 19 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
FIFA
FIFA
The 48-team tournament opened on schedule with 104 matches and a $13.1 billion projected revenue cycle, but three of the first weekend's most consequential stories, Iran's fan lockout, SoFi's embedded strike clause, and Malagò's eligibility suspension, were each decided by domestic legal systems operating outside FIFA's authority.
Morocco
Morocco
Mohamed Ouahbi takes charge of his first senior match in football management against the five-time world champions, with the full-strength defensive structure that reached the 2022 semi-finals intact and facing a Brazilian lineup missing its three most celebrated attackers.
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil open Group C on Saturday at MetLife without Neymar, Estêvão or Militão against a Morocco side managed by a first-time senior coach, making their opener the most consequential group-stage fixture of the opening weekend in terms of pre-tournament expectation versus squad availability.
FIGC / Italy
FIGC / Italy
CONI's referral of the Malagò eligibility question entirely to ANAC means Italy's federation enters the group stage without a confirmed president-elect, with the anti-corruption regulator holding the power to remove the Serie A-backed frontrunner from the ballot ten days before the 22 June election.
United States
United States
The co-host avoided its worst opening image when SoFi workers ratified a deal averting a strike before Friday's Paraguay opener, though the contractual walkout clause means the threat is deferred not dissolved. Pochettino named his XI with Tillman over Reyna, signalling he will manage risk rather than chase headlines against Paraguay.
FFIRI / Iran
FFIRI / Iran
Iran's squad trains in Tijuana with 14 staff still barred from the US, and learned on 9 June that their entire 8% supporter ticket allocation for all three Group G matches was revoked under OFAC sanctions. FFIRI is preparing an Article 4 FIFA complaint over the conditions of participation.