Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey
ConceptUS

Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey

BLS monthly survey of job openings, hires, and separations; February 2026 hiring rate of 3.1% is the basis for Stanford's 34-to-1 AI displacement finding.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics' JOLTS survey underpins Stanford's April 2026 claim that AI is blocking a million hires a year, a reading the New York Fed's 14 May study says the same data does not support.

Last refreshed: 17 July 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Two federal institutions read JOLTS and reached opposite conclusions on AI jobs. Which is right?

Timeline for Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey

#10 14 May
#7 19 Apr
View full timeline →

Background

The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) is the Bureau of Labor Statistics' monthly measure of US labour market flow, tracking job openings, hires, and separations across the nonfarm economy. It is published with roughly a six-week lag and is distinct from the headline unemployment rate: JOLTS measures flows into and out of jobs, not the stock of people employed.

That distinction matters for the AI-jobs debate because a declining hiring rate can show employers pulling back on recruitment without cutting existing staff, a pattern some economists treat as the primary channel through which automation suppresses employment. By contrast, Challenger, Gray & Christmas tracks declared redundancies, the visible surface of job losses.

Until the Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes its long-delayed paper on generative AI and the workforce, JOLTS remains the main federal data series analysts reach for when arguing about AI's effect on hiring, even though the same numbers have supported opposite conclusions from different institutions.

Key Issues
AI hiring dispute

The same data splits federal readings

JOLTS' February 2026 release, published in March, recorded a 3.1% hiring rate, the lowest since April 2020. Stanford Digital Economy Lab applied that 0.6 percentage point drop from the 2023 baseline to the 158.6m nonfarm workforce on 10 April and calculated roughly 950,000 to 1 million fewer annual hires than the 2023 pace, a 34-to-1 ratio against declared AI layoffs.

On 14 May the New York Fed contested that reading directly: its occupation-level study found the decline in postings for AI-exposed roles began before ChatGPT shipped in December 2022, and that junior and senior roles fell at similar rates, undercutting both the timing and the under-25s concentration Stanford's causal story needs. JOLTS remains the only federal input either side agrees on; only the causal reading is contested.

Common Questions
Why do the New York Fed and Stanford disagree about what JOLTS shows?
Stanford reads the aggregate JOLTS hiring rate and attributes its fall to AI, concentrating the effect on under-25s. The NY Fed reads occupation-level job postings and finds the decline in AI-exposed roles began in 2021, before ChatGPT launched in December 2022. The disagreement is about which dataset and which timing evidence is the right measure of AI's effect.Source: New York Fed Liberty Street Economics
Why was the JOLTS hiring rate so low in February 2026?
At 3.1%, the February 2026 JOLTS hiring rate was the lowest since April 2020. Stanford attributes the 0.6-point decline from the 2023 baseline to AI-driven suppression of entry-level hiring. The New York Fed's study disputes AI causation, finding the decline predates ChatGPT's release.Source: Stanford Digital Economy Lab
What is the JOLTS survey and why is it used to measure AI layoffs?
JOLTS is the BLS monthly measure of US job market flows: openings, hires, and separations. Because AI displacement works largely through hires not happening rather than announced cuts, JOLTS captures what Challenger redundancy data misses. However, the NY Fed's May 2026 study found the JOLTS hiring decline predates AI, complicating the causal story.Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics