
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Washington DC think tank advocating for innovation-friendly technology policy.
Last refreshed: 13 April 2026
What does a US tech think tank have to say about Europe's chip policy failures?
Timeline for Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Mentioned in: Sovereign AI unit backs Alphabet-owned lab
UK Startups and InnovationMentioned in: AISI: GPT-5.5 matches Mythos on 32-step attack
AI: Jobs, Power & MoneyMentioned in: Microsoft tells investors 2027 headcount will fall
AI: Jobs, Power & MoneyMentioned in: Schwarz triangle closes at $20bn merger
European Tech SovereigntyMentioned in: IBM's Bob quantifies its own paradox
AI: Jobs, Power & Money- What is the ITIF think tank and who funds it?
- ITIF is a Washington DC tech policy think tank founded in 2006, funded by tech companies, foundations, and government grants; it advocates for pro-innovation, lighter-touch regulation.Source: Background
- Does ITIF support or oppose EU tech regulation?
- ITIF consistently argues for lighter-touch regulation; it critiques EU semiconductor investment timelines and state-aid constraints, though its market-led prescriptions differ from Europe's statist approach.Source: Background
- Why is ITIF cited in European chip policy debates?
- ITIF produces rigorous comparative analyses of US, EU, and Asian innovation policy; its external critiques of EU failures are cited by European reformers even when they reject ITIF's prescriptions.Source: Background
- Is ITIF a bipartisan organisation?
- ITIF describes itself as non-partisan but consistently argues for free-trade and deregulatory positions; its president Robert Atkinson is a frequent commentator on semiconductor supply chains.Source: Background
Background
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a Washington DC-based technology policy think tank founded in 2006. It advocates for pro-innovation regulatory frameworks across broadband, AI, trade, and science policy. ITIF was cited in coverage of the EU's decision to block the Intel Magdeburg megafab, where its analysis of the economic and strategic consequences of semiconductor policy failures informed the European debate .
ITIF describes itself as non-partisan but consistently argues for lighter-touch technology regulation and free-trade positions. It is funded by a mix of technology companies, foundations, and government grants. Its president Robert Atkinson is a frequent commentator on industrial policy, semiconductor supply chains, and US-China technology competition. ITIF publishes detailed comparative analyses of innovation policy across the US, EU, and Asia.
For European tech sovereignty discussions, ITIF occupies an interesting position as an American institution that nonetheless produces rigorous analysis of European policy failures. Its critiques of EU semiconductor investment timelines and state-aid constraints have been cited by European policy reformers, even when ITIF's prescriptions (market-led, limited state intervention) diverge from the European statist approach. It functions as a useful external benchmark in EU debates about whether dirigiste industrial policy actually delivers results.