Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
US Midterms 2026
15SEP

South Carolina Senate blocks post-Callais redraw

3 min read
14:21UTC

South Carolina's state Senate rejected redistricting despite Governor Henry McMaster's pressure, and Mississippi narrowed its post-Callais session to state Supreme Court districts only.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

South Carolina's rejection trims the Callais harvest from 15 toward 12 seats; the math, not solidarity, drove the dissent.

South Carolina's state Senate rejected congressional redistricting on the floor despite the House passing a calendar extension and Governor Henry McMaster applying pressure. Senate Majority Leader Davey Hiott told members the state would not proceed 1. Mississippi narrowed its post-Callais session to state Supreme Court districts only, declining to redraw the congressional map. Both states answered the post-Callais call along with Alabama and Tennessee in late April.

A governor pressing his own Senate majority on a partisan redistricting question and losing is rare on any calendar. The Hiott bloc's argument, reported by NPR, was that an in-cycle redraw would invite federal court intervention before November and produce no net seat gain over the existing 6R-1D map. The countervailing pressure from McMaster, per the same reporting, was that the Callais window will not stay open into 2027. Hiott's bloc judged the November risk larger than the foregone seat opportunity. Mississippi's narrowing was procedurally cleaner, scoping the special session to state court redistricting at the outset rather than calling and failing.

The two refusals shave the Callais harvest estimate from a notional 15 congressional seats toward the lower end of the 12-15 range cited by Cook Political Report. Of the seven candidate Republican states reckoned with mid-decade redistricting after Callais, two have now declined. The Republican track remains fast and asymmetric on the four states that have proceeded: governors' calendars in days against Democratic counter-mechanisms measured in months or years. But asymmetric does not mean uniform.

Brookings Institution redistricting scholar Joshua Douglas noted that intra-party rejections like Hiott's tend to track the specific math in each state rather than any national counter-current. South Carolina's existing 6R-1D map already absorbs most of the available partisan gain; the marginal seat from a redraw was not worth the federal court exposure. Indiana, Ohio and Missouri, where the partisan math leaves more upside, remain the next test of whether the pattern scales.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

After the Supreme Court struck down the rule requiring majority-minority congressional districts in late April 2026, Republican-controlled state governments across the South were expected to redraw their congressional maps to add Republican seats. Four states called special legislative sessions to do so. But two of those states decided not to proceed with full congressional redistricting. South Carolina's state Senate blocked the effort despite pressure from the governor. Mississippi narrowed its special session to redrawing state court districts only, leaving its federal congressional maps unchanged. The reason in both cases was practical: South Carolina's existing maps already give Republicans six of seven seats, leaving little extra to gain from redistricting, while the risk of a federal court challenge was real. Mississippi's heavily Black Jackson region made redrawing the congressional map legally complicated in a different direction. Both states judged the risks higher than the potential rewards.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    South Carolina and Mississippi's refusals trim the Cook Political Report's Callais harvest estimate from a notional 15 seats toward the lower end of the 12-15 range, narrowing the Republican baseline gain before any wave is measured against it.

    Immediate · 0.82
  • Precedent

    The SC Senate's floor rejection of a governor-backed redistricting plan demonstrates that the Callais harvest is bounded by the individual political math in each state, not by national party solidarity, which is relevant to projections for Indiana, Ohio and Missouri.

    Short term · 0.75
  • Risk

    McMaster's public pressure campaign against Hiott, and its failure, may reduce South Carolina governors' leverage over their own Senate majorities on future redistricting questions, weakening the executive-legislative alignment that made Alabama and Tennessee's fast timelines possible.

    Long term · 0.5
First Reported In

Update #6 · A primary nullified mid-vote

NPR· 19 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Cook Political Report
Cook Political Report
Cook Political Report published a dated House ratings snapshot on 11 September and changed no seat's rating, holding at 206 Democratic to 208 Republican with 21 tossups since its 3 September batch. Publishing without a change is a dated decision, not an oversight, leaving Republicans ahead on seats while Democrats lead the national vote by 6.6 points.
Department of Justice
Department of Justice
A Justice Department official told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that preservation letters like the one sent to Aguilar go to states the department is in active litigation against over incomplete voter registration lists. The department would not answer the paper's specific questions about the personal investigation notice riding inside the same letter.
Francisco Aguilar
Francisco Aguilar
Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar publicly rejected Justice Department pressure on 12 September, days after a 4 September letter combined a records-preservation demand with a personal notice that he is under investigation. He said he will not fold until a judge orders him to, making his office's compliance a political stand rather than a routine filing.
Brett Kavanaugh
Brett Kavanaugh
Justice Brett Kavanaugh denied Missouri's state-track stay application alone on 8 September without referring it, then sent the separate federal-track application in Onder v. State of Missouri to the full Court, which stayed it on 10 September. His choice of which application to keep and which to share decided how much of the fight one justice controlled.
Robert Onder and the federal plaintiffs
Robert Onder and the federal plaintiffs
Robert Onder and three other Republican plaintiffs won a temporary restraining order from Chief Judge Stephen R. Clark on 8 September ordering Missouri to use HB 1, then lost it when the Supreme Court stayed it on 10 September. Their federal route ran parallel to Hoskins's own reversal and ended the same way, with the 2022 map governing 3 November.
Richard Von Glahn and People Not Politicians
Richard Von Glahn and People Not Politicians
Richard Von Glahn and People Not Politicians won Von Glahn v. Hoskins on 3 September, persuading the Missouri Supreme Court that their referendum petition stripped HB 1 of effect and sent it to voters as Proposition A. The contempt finding against Hoskins this week confirms their win held even after the state's chief election officer tried to reverse it.