Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
UK Local Elections 2026
3SEP

Carol Ney quits Reform over a post

2 min read
12:41UTC

Carol Ney resigned from Reform UK on the evening of Friday 7 August, under four months after joining and having been the Plymouth group's deputy leader.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

Plymouth's Reform group lost its deputy leader over a post the leader would not act on.

Carol Ney, councillor for Southway ward on Plymouth City Council, resigned from Reform UK on the evening of Friday 7 August, under four months after joining the party on 17 April 1. She had been deputy leader of its group on the council. Elected as Labour in 2023, sitting as an independent from 2025 and a Reform member from April, she has worn three labels in three years.

What set it off was a Facebook post about Poland's border policy by a fellow Plymouth Reform councillor, Vanessa Tyler, which read in part: "This is what Reform and Restore would do if they get in... Do you not care about our country?" Group leader Steve Ricketts declined to reprimand Tyler over it. Ney was then replaced as deputy leader by Chris Sharpe, without the group voting on the change 2.

New council groups usually fracture over their first hard budget, because a conduct complaint needs a disciplinary route and a group four months old rarely has one. Plymouth ran the other sequence. The complaint came first, found no process to travel through, and left by the only exit available to it. The same group is also split over local government reorganisation and over Ricketts's own re-election prospects, so three disputes run at once inside an administration that took office in May.

This is what the aggregate looks like at close range. Behind each increment of the tracker Mark Pack has kept since May sits a named councillor, a dated Friday evening and an argument nobody outside the group witnessed. Her ward keeps its councillor; the group loses its deputy leader and gains a precedent about how the next one gets chosen.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A council 'group' is all the councillors from one party sitting together on a council, and it runs its own internal affairs, including who holds roles like deputy leader, much like any club decides its own officers. There is no law requiring a vote of the whole group before a leader appoints a deputy. In Plymouth, Carol Ney quit Reform UK's Southway ward seat after her group leader, Steve Ricketts, would not discipline a fellow councillor over a Facebook post. Chris Sharpe then became deputy group leader without the wider group voting on it, because the rules allow that.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Council group leadership and officer roles, including deputy leader, are internal party matters governed by each group's own standing orders rather than by local government law, so a leader can appoint or reshuffle deputies without a formal vote of the wider group or any external oversight.

That structural gap means disputes over how a leader handles a colleague's conduct, as in Ney's complaint about Vanessa Tyler's Facebook post, are resolved entirely inside the party rather than through any statutory process.

There is also no mechanism forcing a by-election when a councillor resigns from a party but keeps, or in Ney's case gives up, their seat; the seat's future depends solely on whether the individual chooses to stand down, leaving voters with no formal say in the outcome of an internal disciplinary dispute.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Ney's resignation leaves the Southway ward seat vacant or filled by whichever process Plymouth City Council's constitution specifies for a resignation, rather than by any voter-facing mechanism.

  • Risk

    A leader's unilateral appointment of a deputy without a group vote, following a contested disciplinary decision, risks further departures if other councillors share Ney's objection.

First Reported In

Update #15 · Reform bleeds councillors, wins by-elections

Greater Manchester Combined Authority· 12 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Scottish Labour members
Scottish Labour members
Scottish Labour's published leadership nominations show 33 MPs and MSPs backing Michael Marra against 12 for Joe Fagan, with members voting until 17 September and a result on 19 September. Elected members do not cast the ballot, so the nomination gap measures the parliamentary party rather than the membership that will decide it.
Electoral Commission
Electoral Commission
The Electoral Commission published its Q2 2026 donations register on 3 September, recording Reform UK's £5.44m as the highest of any party and Ben Delo's £4m as two cash gifts. The register records a donation's form and amount, not the origin of a donor's wealth, so a cash gift shows the same as any other.
Reform UK
Reform UK
Danny Kruger, Reform UK's MP for East Wiltshire, called the Bill "a flagrantly partisan attempt to kneecap Reform UK" during the 2 September debate, objecting to its trade-union exemption. Reform enters its Birmingham conference having topped Q2's donor register at £5.44m, £4m of it in cash from Ben Delo, a form the new ban does not reach.
Ian Davidson, Acting Returning Officer for Clacton
Ian Davidson, Acting Returning Officer for Clacton
Davidson's office printed a 90cm ballot paper for the record 34-candidate field, with nothing in electoral law capping candidate numbers or the £500 deposit each pays. He expects the paper's size to raise printing costs and slow the count into the early hours, a strain that follows from the major parties' boycott, not from turnout.
Labour Party
Labour Party
Labour gained Penistone East from Reform on 20 August but lost Harraby South to Reform the same night, a wash that undercuts any claim of momentum. The party can point to beating Reform in a genuinely fought contest, but not to a pattern running only in its favour.
Liberal Democrats
Liberal Democrats
The Liberal Democrats took two of Reform's May wards, Almondbury on 13 August and St Neots Eynesbury on 20 August, the latter on a 29.8-point rise in their own vote share. Both results let the party claim it is the beneficiary when voters turn against Reform, not Labour or the Conservatives.