27MAR

Leaked data: 62% killed, medevac gone

2 min read

20:48UTC

A 62:38 killed-to-wounded ratio, the inverse of Western military norms, points to a catastrophic failure of battlefield medical care on the Russian side.

← Back to Pentagon diverts funds; 948 drones fired Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

Russian troops appear nearly twice as likely to die as to survive their wounds.

Leaked Russian internal assessments revealed a 62:38 killed-to-wounded ratio, the inverse of Western military norms where roughly 30% of casualties are killed and 70% survive ¹. The data, cited by Ukrainian Military Intelligence, suggests Russian field medical care has effectively collapsed.

Western armies invest heavily in the "golden hour": rapid casualty evacuation, forward surgical teams, and helicopter medevac to stabilise wounded soldiers within 60 minutes. The 62:38 ratio implies that the majority of wounded Russian soldiers die before reaching treatment. Contributing factors likely include insufficient armoured ambulances, overextended medical units across a 1,200-kilometre front, and the sheer volume of daily engagements (619 in four days by Syrskyi's count).

The intelligence source introduces uncertainty. Ukrainian military intelligence has operational incentives to emphasise Russian losses. Western military analysts have not independently corroborated the specific ratio. However, the figure is consistent with observable indicators: recruitment that fails to replace losses, Mediazona's confirmed death count accelerating to 207 per day, and Russia's reliance on convict recruits and mobilised reservists with minimal training.

If the ratio holds at scale, Russia's 206,200 confirmed deaths translate to approximately 126,600 surviving wounded, not the 480,000-plus a Western ratio would produce. Each Russian soldier sent to the front faces far worse odds than any peer military would accept.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

In modern Western armies, roughly 30 out of every 100 casualties die; 70 survive their wounds. Leaked Russian internal data suggests the opposite is happening: roughly 62 die, 38 survive. This matters because it means Russian soldiers are nearly twice as likely to die from their wounds as survive them. The likely reason: Russia cannot get injured soldiers to hospital quickly enough. Ukrainian drones attack supply routes in Russian-held areas, and Russia's military medical system was not built for this scale of daily casualties. Treat this with caution: the data comes from Ukrainian military intelligence, which has reasons to emphasise Russian losses.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

A 62:38 killed-to-wounded ratio has identifiable structural causes.

Russia's reliance on convict recruits and poorly trained mobilised reservists means fewer soldiers have basic combat casualty care training. Applying a tourniquet in the first minutes can be the difference between survival and death — a skill drilled into professional soldiers but often absent in hastily mobilised units.

Ukrainian drone saturation of Russian rear areas disrupts medical evacuation routes. Armoured ambulances and casualty collection points are legitimate military targets; Ukraine's FPV drones have been documented striking both.

Russia's 1,200-kilometre front line means medical units must cover enormous distances. Forward surgical teams cannot be pre-positioned everywhere; the 207 confirmed daily deaths suggest many soldiers bleed out before reaching treatment.

Source Landscape

This story draws on centre-left-leaning sources from Ukraine

Ukraine

Primary parallel: Soviet forces in Afghanistan (1979-89) had a killed-to-wounded ratio of approximately 1:3.4 — meaning roughly 23% of casualties died. Even that figure, considered high by Western standards, is far below Russia's reported 62:38 in Ukraine. The Soviet Afghan campaign is the closest modern precedent for a major power fighting a high-intensity war with an underfunded medical evacuation chain.

Counter-parallel: US forces in Vietnam achieved a killed-to-wounded ratio of roughly 1:5, largely through helicopter medevac. The golden-hour doctrine — evacuate within 60 minutes — saved lives at a rate Russia's current posture evidently cannot match. Ukraine's own drone interdiction of Russian rear areas may be actively preventing armoured ambulance movement.

Sources:Kyiv Independent

Mentions:Russia →Mediazona →

First Reported In

Update #8 · Pentagon diverts funds; 948 drones fired

Kyiv Independent· 27 Mar 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

Turkey

Turkey, a major buyer of Russian diesel cargoes, loses that access under Moscow's first producer-binding export ban, in force from 8 July to 31 July. Ankara hosted the same week's NATO summit pledging EUR 70bn to Ukraine, sitting on both sides of the fuel-and-alliance ledger.

NATO

NATO leaders meeting in Ankara on 7 and 8 July pledged EUR 70bn in equipment, assistance and training for Ukraine across 2026, with a 2027 sustainment commitment and a $40bn Drone Edge counter-drone initiative. European allies now fund the vast majority of that package, filling the gap left by Washington's idled crude waiver.

India

India's state refiners continued buying discounted Urals crude as June's price fell to $63.18 a barrel, insulating New Delhi from the OFAC waiver gap still constraining Western buyers. Indian refiners could pick up diesel-export share as Russia's producer-binding ban shuts out its former customers.

China

China's independent refiners kept importing discounted Urals crude through June as the price fell to $63.18 a barrel, down 26% month-on-month per CREA. Beijing has said nothing on Moscow's new diesel ban, leaving Chinese refiners a likely beneficiary if Turkish and Brazilian buyers seek replacement cargoes.

United States

No successor licence has been issued since General License 134C lapsed on 17 June, leaving a 26-day gap, the longest of the war, in the Russian crude waiver. Washington's silence is tightening the channel without any stated decision, as Treasury weighs whether to let it die.

Ukraine

Ukraine's long-range strike campaign shifted from refineries to seaborne fuel tankers crossing the Sea of Azov, cutting tracked vessel traffic 55% between 30 June and 11 July, per Starboard Maritime Intelligence. The shift targets Russia's export revenue directly rather than just domestic supply, adding pressure alongside the collapsing Urals price.