Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Russia-Ukraine War 2026
23JUL

Insurers hold the line on Hormuz risk

2 min read
20:33UTC

The International Group of P&I Clubs held its Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force through the entire shipping recovery, and now has a burning gas carrier off Limah to cite in keeping it.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

One strike near Limah lets insurers keep the whole strait priced as a war zone.

The International Group of P&I (protection and indemnity) Clubs, a mutual association insuring roughly 90% of world merchant tonnage, kept its Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force through the whole recovery, even as London hull war-risk premiums fell to about 2% of a vessel's value 1. That figure is still around twenty times the pre-conflict baseline, so cover had cheapened without the strait ever being treated as safe.

Marine war cover in the Gulf runs through mutual pooling. The Group's clubs share losses above a retention, so no single club can quietly price one Gulf cargo back into Hormuz without the whole pool re-underwriting the strait. Owners had been carrying that risk themselves as traffic recovered ; now the clubs have a burning carrier off Limah to point to, and the decision to reopen or hold the exclusion falls on all of them at once rather than one underwriter at a time.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Insurance companies that cover cargo ships, called P&I clubs, had kept a special exclusion in place for the Strait of Hormuz, meaning they would not pay out for war-related damage there even as day-to-day shipping picked up again. These insurers work together as a group and share big losses, so one company acting alone has no power to start covering the risky route again; they all have to agree. Now that a gas tanker has actually been hit, the case for keeping the exclusion in place got much easier for the whole group to make.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The International Group of P&I Clubs operates through mutual pooling: member clubs share catastrophic losses above a set retention, so any one club's decision to reopen Hormuz cover effectively commits the whole pool to shared exposure, which requires group-wide, not individual, agreement.

That structure means a single incident, like the Al Rekayyat fire, can reset the exclusion for every member simultaneously, even for clubs with no vessels anywhere near the strike, because the pooling mechanism does not distinguish between a club's own claims history and the group's collective risk.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Continued exclusion keeps commercial insurance out of reach for most Hormuz transits, pushing owners toward self-insurance or state-backed guarantees like the underused US Development Finance Corporation facility.

First Reported In

Update #148 · Iran shoots the Hormuz route it rejected

The National· 7 Jul 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Insurers hold the line on Hormuz risk
Mutual pooling means one hit reprices the strait for every owner, not just the cargo that was struck.
Different Perspectives
IAEA (Rafael Grossi)
IAEA (Rafael Grossi)
IAEA inspectors logged Zaporizhzhia's 22nd loss of off-site power, ten of them in the last three months, after a thunderstorm knocked out the plant's sole surviving backup line. Grossi reads the accelerating frequency, not any single outage, as the safety signal now that the plant's redundancy is exhausted.
United States (Treasury/OFAC)
United States (Treasury/OFAC)
Washington has let general licence 134C, its Russian crude waiver, lapse for 36 days with no successor, the longest gap of the war. Treasury has not said whether the non-renewal reflects deliberate policy or administrative delay, leaving buyers to price in compliance risk rather than wait for clarity.
Slovakia
Slovakia
Slovakia dropped its hold-out on the EU's 21st sanctions package only after winning a 2028 guarantee phasing out Russian gas, the exact pipeline dependency, roughly 80% of its crude supply, that gave it leverage. Bratislava's climbdown clears the package but leaves the same single-veto mechanism intact for the next round.
Russia (Kremlin and general staff)
Russia (Kremlin and general staff)
General staff chief Gerasimov claimed Donetsk captures on 18 July that ISW says it cannot corroborate, extending a pattern ISW clocked at a 5:1 exaggeration ratio earlier this year. Moscow is conditioning its public for a possible autumn mobilisation after September's Duma elections rather than acknowledging the front has stalled.
Ukraine (Zelenskyy government)
Ukraine (Zelenskyy government)
Zelenskyy dismissed his commander-in-chief, defence minister and chief of general staff within eight days, replacing Syrskyi with Drapatyi and Hnatov with Skybiuk as protesters demanded Syrskyi go and Fedorov return. Kyiv frames the sweep as a bet on manoeuvre capacity ahead of a feared Russian autumn surge, not the disarray critics read into three changes in a week.
The United Kingdom
The United Kingdom
Starmer pledged £300 million in Kyiv on 16 July toward Ukraine's Gripen E squadron, adding to the PURL expansion Trump and Rutte had announced two days earlier. London is paying into a scheme built around a shortfall NATO's own published $4bn-plus pledge does not close against Zelenskyy's roughly $15bn stated need.