Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
3MAY

Hengaw: 310 civilians among 2,400 dead

3 min read
10:26UTC

The only organisation separating soldiers from civilians in Iran's death toll produces a ratio of 6.7 to 1. Shift one methodological assumption, and the ratio becomes 1.2 to 1.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The 6.7:1 ratio is analytically meaningful only if the 2,090 classified as military or security were lawful combatant targets under IHL — and a significant fraction of Basij members almost certainly do not meet that threshold at any given moment.

Hengaw, a Kurdish human rights monitoring organisation based in Norway, reported 2,400 people killed in Iran: approximately 310 confirmed civilians and 2,090 military or security personnel. This breakdown is the most granular published by any source tracking the conflict and the only one attempting systematic distinction between civilian and combatant dead.

The implied ratio — 6.7 military or security personnel killed for every confirmed civilian — would, if accurate, place this campaign well below the civilian casualty rates of comparable modern air operations. NATO's 78-day bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 killed an estimated 489–528 civilians (per Human Rights Watch) against roughly 1,000 Yugoslav military personnel — a ratio below 2:1. The US-led Coalition campaign against the Islamic State from 2014 to 2019 produced civilian-to-combatant ratios that varied by theatre but rarely approached 6:1 in the Coalition's favour, according to Airwars monitoring data. A sustained ratio of 6.7:1 across five days and more than 2,000 targets would indicate discrimination between military and civilian targets at a rate with few modern precedents.

Two factors erode that reading. First, Hengaw's 310 confirmed civilians stands against HRANA's 1,097 — a gap of 787 people. The difference is methodological: Hengaw applies a higher evidentiary bar, counting only deaths it can independently categorise with enough information to distinguish civilian from combatant. HRANA counts all civilian deaths reported through its network, a lower threshold that captures more cases with less granularity per case. The true civilian figure falls somewhere in that range, and the range is wide enough to transform the analysis. At 310 civilians against 2,090 military, the ratio is 6.7:1. At 1,097 civilians, it drops to roughly 1.2:1 — a figure consistent with the most destructive air campaigns of the past three decades and far less favourable to Coalition claims of precision.

Second, Hengaw's monitoring infrastructure is strongest in Iran's western Kurdish-majority provinces — Kurdistan, Kermanshah, Ilam — where its networks have documented state violence against Kurdish populations for years. Its reach into Baluchistan, Khuzestan, or the central Iranian plateau, where different communities and communication networks operate, is less established. The strike that killed schoolchildren in Minab — where NPR satellite imagery revealed blast damage extending into adjacent residential blocks beyond the school — sits in Hormozgan province on Iran's southern coast, well outside Hengaw's core coverage area. With Iran's internet at 1% capacity for six days , the deaths that no network can reach are the ones that determine whether the true ratio is closer to 6.7 or to 1.2. That determination cannot be made while the bombs are still falling.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Hengaw's figures suggest roughly 6–7 soldiers or security personnel were killed for every civilian — which sounds like precision targeting. But Iran's Basij militia, which makes up a large portion of that security figure, consists partly of part-time volunteers who hold ordinary civilian jobs. Under the laws of war, you can only lawfully target someone while they are actively participating in combat. A Basij member at home or at their civilian workplace when a strike occurred would legally count as a civilian death, even if the military records them as a combatant.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The near-equivalence of the Iranian state Foundation of Martyrs total figure (1,045) and HRANA's civilian-only figure (1,097) suggests the state body is either suppressing its military casualty count — avoiding public acknowledgement of security force losses for domestic political reasons — or that both organisations are drawing from the same degraded reporting network, producing artificially convergent figures for structurally different reasons. Either explanation undermines the independent reliability of both sources.

Root Causes

The Basij's organisational structure — a mass volunteer paramilitary of between 100,000 and 300,000 active members who maintain civilian employment — creates a structural ambiguity in IHL classification. Unlike professional soldiers who are continuously targetable as combatants, Basij members are lawful targets only during periods of direct participation in hostilities under Additional Protocol I, meaning their status shifts with their activity rather than their affiliation.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If a substantial fraction of the 2,090 classified as security personnel were Basij members not actively participating in hostilities at the time of strikes, the effective civilian toll is materially higher than the 310 confirmed figure, with corresponding IHL liability implications for targeting authorities.

    Medium term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    The three-source divergence in methodology will prevent any single authoritative death toll from emerging during the conflict, sustaining competing narratives that each party will deploy selectively to support its legal and political position.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Accepting Hengaw's civilian/military classification without scrutiny sets a precedent for treating dual-status militia deaths as combatant casualties, which would lower the legal bar for future strikes on irregular forces with civilian employment — beyond the Iran context.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #20 · Hormuz sealed; Senate war powers bill fails

Hengaw· 5 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Hengaw: 310 civilians among 2,400 dead
Hengaw's military-to-civilian breakdown is the only granular casualty data available, but the 787-person gap between its 310 confirmed civilians and HRANA's 1,097 means the ratio could range from 6.7:1 to 1.2:1 — a spread that encompasses both a historically discriminate air campaign and one consistent with the most destructive modern precedents.
Different Perspectives
International human rights monitors (NetBlocks, IHR, Hengaw)
International human rights monitors (NetBlocks, IHR, Hengaw)
NetBlocks recorded 1,704 cumulative hours of near-total internet blackout for roughly 90 million Iranians on Day 74, while IHR documented ongoing executions under emergency provisions. These organisations are the only active monitoring windows into a civilian population cut off from the global internet for 71 consecutive days.
UK / France coalition
UK / France coalition
The Royal Navy confirmed HMS Dragon's Hormuz deployment on its own website on 11 May, converting a press-reported presence into declared force posture; UK and French defence ministers hosted a coalition meeting the same day. Britain and France are now the only named contributors to a Hormuz escort mission all five allies Trump originally asked had declined.
Saudi Aramco / Gulf producers
Saudi Aramco / Gulf producers
Saudi Aramco CEO Amin Nasser warned on 11 May that a Hormuz closure could remove 100 million barrels of weekly supply from global markets (roughly 15 million barrels per day for a week), a figure that dwarfs any OPEC+ swing capacity. The warning functions as both a price-floor signal and a public pressure on Washington to protect transit.
Beijing / Chinese Government
Beijing / Chinese Government
China has not publicly acknowledged the four Hong Kong-registered entities designated on 11 May or extended MOFCOM's Blocking Rules cover to HK-domiciled firms. Xi Jinping hosts Trump on 14–15 May having already de-risked state-bank balance sheets via NFRA's quiet loan halt, entering the summit partially compliant before any negotiation.
Tehran / Iranian Government
Tehran / Iranian Government
Foreign Minister Araghchi described Iran's 10-point counter-proposal as 'reasonable and responsible' via spokesman Baqaei on 11 May, and widened the mediator pool by meeting Turkish, Egyptian, and Dutch counterparts in a single day. Tehran is buying procedural runway while Trump's verbal rejection went unmatched by any written US counter.
Trump White House
Trump White House
Trump called the ceasefire 'on massive life support' and dismissed Iran's 10-point counter-proposal as 'a piece of garbage' on 11 May, while departing for Beijing two days later with no signed Iran instrument to show Congress. The verbal maximum and the paper void coexist: the administration is running a legal pressure campaign through Treasury while the president free-lances the rhetoric.