1MAY

Iran executes Shirzadi Fakhr at dawn

1 min read

10:38UTC

Soltanali Shirzadi Fakhr was executed on Thursday 23 April on moharebeh and Israel-collaboration charges, Hengaw documented, separate from the protest-era detainee cohort.

← Back to "Not at war": three claims, no treaty Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

A new wartime charge category, Israel collaboration, runs alongside the protest-era executions Hengaw tracks separately.

Soltanali Shirzadi Fakhr was executed at dawn on Thursday 23 April on moharebeh and "collaboration with Israel" charges, according to Hengaw ¹. The Hengaw note records the case as separate from the protest-era detainee cohort the organisation has tracked since the war began. Hengaw is the Norway-based Iranian human rights documentation organisation; moharebeh is the Persian Sharia-law charge of "enmity against God", historically applied to political and security offences and carrying the death penalty under Iran's penal code.

The distinction matters for the wartime judicial record. Iran's domestic security apparatus is now running two parallel execution tracks: the protest-era moharebeh sentences Hengaw has been tabulating, and a separate Israel-collaboration cohort opened by the war. Three Ali Fahim co-defendants (Shahab Zahdi, Abolfazl Salehi Siavoshani and Yaser Rajaeifar) remain in solitary confinement at Ghezel Hesar prison facing imminent execution per Hengaw, after Iran executed Erfan Kiani on Saturday 25 April as the eighth wartime political prisoner .

The MEK (Mojahedin-e Khalq) listing on Shirzadi Fakhr's charge sheet is the legal mechanism Iran uses to fold political opposition into security prosecution; the Israeli-collaboration framing is the wartime layer added on top. Together they describe an executive judicial process that requires no public trial and exposes families to courier-only notification of sentence dates.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Moharebeh is an Islamic legal concept meaning 'enmity against God', used in Iranian law to charge people with crimes against the state or Islam. Iran's judiciary uses it as a capital charge for a broad range of offences, from armed insurgency to protest activity. The additional 'collaboration with Israel' charge in Shirzadi Fakhr's case is new in wartime Iran: it reflects the government's effort to frame wartime dissent as active support for the military enemy, carrying a harder legal basis for the death penalty. **Hengaw**, the Norway-based Kurdish human rights organisation monitoring these cases, keeps a running count because Iranian state media rarely reports individual executions unless they serve a deterrence function.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

The 'Israel-collaboration' charge category raises the offence from a domestic-law matter to a wartime treason equivalent, which is harder for international human rights organisations to contest under Iranian law. A moharebeh conviction alone can be appealed on procedural grounds; a wartime collaboration charge activates emergency-jurisdiction courts with faster timelines.

The charge also signals to Iran's internal surveillance network that the threshold for capital charges has expanded beyond protest activity to include any contact with Israeli or Israeli-proximate entities. In practice, that covers a wide range of Iranian diaspora and commercial relationships, giving the **IRGC** and judiciary a broadened pool of potential targets.

What could happen next?

Meaning
The creation of a 'wartime Israel-collaboration' capital charge category is likely to accelerate the pace of executions against Iranians with any documented contact with Israeli entities, including dual nationals and academics.
Short term · Assessed
Meaning
Three Ali Fahim co-defendants in solitary at Ghezel Hesar face the same moharebeh framework; the Shirzadi Fakhr execution, documented separately by Hengaw, suggests the judiciary is processing the two cohorts in parallel rather than in sequence.
Short term · Assessed
Meaning
International human rights bodies including Amnesty International and the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran now face a dual-track execution programme: protest-era sentences and a new wartime collaboration category, complicating the legal arguments for any moratorium.
Short term · Assessed

Sources:ANI News·Spectrum News·Euronews

Mentions:Soltanali Shirzadi Fakhr →Hengaw →MEK →Israel →Shahab Zahdi →Yaser Rajaeifar →Abolfazl Salehi Siavoshani →Erfan Kiani →moharebeh →Ali Fahim →Iran →Norway →Qezel Hesar Prison →

First Reported In

Update #80 · Three carriers, zero instruments

ANI News· 26 Apr 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Iran executes Erfan Kiani, eighth wartime hanging

The execution of Shirzadi Fakhr on 23 April follows the execution of Erfan Kiani on moharebeh charges on 25 April (ID:2781), extending Iran's wartime execution record with a new Israel-collaboration charge category.

Occurred 25 Apr 2026

Read story →

This Event

Iran executes Shirzadi Fakhr at dawn

A new wartime charge category appears alongside the protest-era moharebeh sentences: collaboration with foreign enemies, separately tracked.

Different Perspectives

Oil markets

Brent fell $1.05 to $106.0 on summit Day 1 but remains $5-7 above the post-ceasefire equilibrium analysts modelled in March; the market is pricing a holding pattern, not a breakthrough. OilPrice.com and Aramco CEO Nasser converge on buffer-exhaustion before Hormuz reopens if the blockade extends past mid-June.

Iranian dissidents and human rights monitors

Hengaw documented a five-prison simultaneous execution cluster on 13 May, with Gorgan appearing for the first time in the wartime register. Espionage charges framed as Israel-linked moharebeh now extend across Mashhad, Karaj, and Gorgan, using the war as judicial cover for protest-era detainees.

BRICS / Global South

Araghchi's Delhi appearance positioned Iran as a victim of US aggression before non-Western foreign ministers, with Deputy FM Bagheri Kani calling on BRICS to act against US aggression. India, as the largest non-Chinese user of Iranian-routed crude, faces pressure to balance bloc solidarity against its own shipping and sanctions exposure.

China

Beijing accepted the Nvidia chip clearance on summit Day 1 and gave Rubio verbal acknowledgement of Iran as an Asian stability concern, having already put Pakistan on paper as the mediatory channel on 13 May (ID:3253), deflecting the US ask for direct Chinese action without refusing it.

Iran (government and civilian diplomatic track)

Araghchi denied any Hormuz obstruction at BRICS Delhi on 14 May while Iran's SNSC had finalised a Hormuz security plan the day before. Israel Hayom's single-sourced 15-year freeze offer gives Tehran a deployable figure in non-Western forums regardless of corroboration; the state attributed 3,468 wartime deaths with no independent verification.

United States (Trump administration and Senate moderates)

Trump signed a chip clearance for 10 Chinese firms on summit Day 1 and zero Iran instruments across 76 days; Rubio and Vance made verbal Iran asks without paper. Murkowski voted yes on the 49-50 war-powers resolution after Hegseth told the Senate that Article 2 makes an AUMF unnecessary.