Skip to content
Iran Conflict 2026
28FEB

Houthis reopen Red Sea shipping attacks

1 min read
19:00UTC

Houthi forces resumed attacks on Red Sea shipping on 28 February 2026 in direct response to the US-Israeli strikes on Iran, re-activating a campaign that had paused through parts of early 2026.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Houthi reactivation on 28 February confirms residual Axis of Resistance coordination capacity and will return Red Sea commercial shipping to Cape of Good Hope routing within 48 hours.

Houthi reactivation was among the more predictable proxy responses, and it arrived on schedule. The Houthis had maintained residual launch capability through the US and UK strikes against Yemeni territory in 2024 and early 2025 and had used pauses and resumptions as a political signalling tool throughout the crisis period.

The timing of resumption — coinciding precisely with the Iran strikes — confirms that Houthi operational decisions remain linked to Iranian political direction, regardless of the group's claims of acting autonomously in solidarity with Palestinians. This coordination is operationally relevant: it demonstrates that the Axis of Resistance command network retained enough coherence to synchronise at least one proxy activation even as Iranian command structures were being disrupted by Roaring Lion.

The commercial shipping impact will be near-immediate. Vessels that had cautiously returned to Red Sea routes through 2025 will reverse course. The additional 7,000–11,000 nautical miles of Cape of Good Hope routing adds approximately 10–14 days to Asia-Europe transit times and $1–2 million per voyage in fuel costs — figures that pass directly into consumer goods prices within two to three shipping cycles.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

  • Meaning

First Reported In

Update #2 · Five cities struck on opening night

Al Jazeera· 28 Feb 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
South Korean financial markets
South Korean financial markets
South Korea, which imports virtually all its crude oil, is absorbing the war's economic transmission most acutely among non-belligerents. The second KOSPI circuit breaker in four sessions — with Samsung down over 10% and SK Hynix down 12.3% — reflects an industrial economy unable to reprice energy costs that have risen 72% in ten days. The market response indicates Korean industry cannot sustain oil above $100 per barrel without margin compression across manufacturing, semiconductors, and shipping.
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
The first confirmed civilian deaths in Saudi Arabia — one Indian and one Bangladeshi killed, twelve Bangladeshis wounded — fell on communities with no voice in the military decisions that placed them in harm's way. Migrant workers live near military installations because that housing is affordable, not by choice. Bangladesh and India face the dilemma of needing to protect nationals who cannot easily leave a war zone while depending on Gulf remittances that fund a substantial share of their domestic economies.
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Aliyev treats the Nakhchivan strikes as a direct act of war against Azerbaijani sovereignty, placing armed forces on full combat readiness and demanding an Iranian explanation. The response is calibrated to maximise international sympathy while stopping short of military retaliation — Baku cannot fight Iran alone and needs either Turkish or NATO backing to credibly deter further strikes.
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
The Hormuz closure is an existential threat. Japan, South Korea, and India receive the majority of their crude through the strait — they will bear the heaviest economic cost of a war they had no part in.
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.
Turkey
Turkey
Has absorbed three Iranian ballistic missile interceptions since 4 March without invoking NATO Article 5 consultation. Each incident narrows Ankara's political room to continue absorbing without Alliance-level response.