Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21SEP

Oil Retreats From Peak Amid Ceasefire Speculation

1 min read
15:34UTC

Brent crude eased to $110.47 from its $116 peak, but remains 64% above pre-war levels with the strait operating at a fraction of normal capacity.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

Markets priced in ceasefire hope; the supply disruption remains.

Brent Crude traded at $110.47 per barrel, retreating from the $116 peak on 28 March. The pullback may reflect ceasefire hopes from the Islamabad talks, though the fundamental supply picture has not changed. the strait of Hormuz remains over 90% below pre-war transit volumes at 53 weekly transits against a baseline of 966.

The price remains roughly 64% above pre-war levels of $67.41 per barrel. Analysts had warned that $150 per barrel was possible if the strait stays closed another month. The Islamabad Accord's immediate-reopening provision is the first diplomatic instrument that directly addresses the oil price mechanism, which may explain why markets have responded to the framework's existence even before Iran has accepted it.

The modest retreat should not be mistaken for normalisation. The IEA, IMF, and World Bank jointly described this as one of the largest supply shortages in energy market history . That assessment has not changed.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil prices dropped slightly from their highest point of the war, possibly because traders think the new Pakistan peace plan might work. But prices are still about 64% higher than before the war started. The strait that most of the world's oil passes through is still barely open. If the peace plan fails, prices could rise sharply again.

What could happen next?
  • Markets pricing in ceasefire probability; failure would trigger sharp reversal

First Reported In

Update #60 · Pakistan's Ceasefire Plan Fills the Vacuum

CNBC· 6 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Oil Retreats From Peak Amid Ceasefire Speculation
The price retreat, while modest, is the first sustained pullback since the war began. It suggests markets are pricing in a non-zero probability of ceasefire from the Islamabad talks. However, with Hormuz at roughly 5% of pre-war transit volumes, the fundamental supply disruption remains unchanged.
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.