Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
3SEP

Jordan stops three of four incoming missiles

1 min read
16:40UTC

Jordan shot down three of four incoming Iranian missiles on 19 July, and its deputy prime minister took a call condemning the attacks. One missile was not stopped.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Jordan intercepted three of four missiles and published the count, unusually for a state under fire.

Jordan shot down three of four incoming Iranian missiles on 19 July, and its deputy prime minister received a call condemning the attacks 1.

The fourth missile got through, and Amman has not said where it came down or what it struck.

Amman did not choose this exposure. Muwaffaq Salti Air Base sits inside Jordan's borders and has drawn Iranian fire since 9 July , most seriously in the 17 July attack that killed American service members . Jordan commands none of the aircraft that fly from the base and none of the operations they support, yet every missile launched at them crosses Jordanian territory.

Releasing a three-of-four number does work at home. It shows a defence that mostly functions, to a public being told from Tehran that Jordanian soldiers are feeding Iran targeting information. The condemnation call delivered to the deputy prime minister carries the diplomatic half of the same message, addressed outward while the interception count is addressed inward.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Jordan says it shot down three of four incoming Iranian missiles on 19 July. Its deputy prime minister also received a phone call condemning the strikes. This is one of several Iranian strikes on Jordan this month; the country has been targeted since it was first drawn into the war on 10 June {{EVREF:/t/iran-conflict-2026/123/iran-hits-us-bases-in-three-countries/}}. Jordan giving a specific number, three of four, rather than claiming a full intercept, is a plainer disclosure than the IRGC's own unverified claims about Jordan and Kuwait this same week.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Jordan disclosing a partial three-of-four intercept rate, rather than claiming full success, is a plainer disclosure than the IRGC's uncorroborated Nasr-2 claims this same week.

First Reported In

Update #157 · IAEA takes up Darkhovin as utilities become targets

Al Jazeera English· 20 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.