Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
7AUG

160 prisoners freed on each side

1 min read
12:08UTC

Russia and Ukraine each freed 160 soldiers on 26 June in an Emirati-brokered exchange; the freed Russians had been held in Belarus.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The humanitarian swap track keeps working while ceasefire talks stall, and the freed Russians came from Belarus.

Russia and Ukraine each freed 160 soldiers on 26 June in an exchange brokered by the United Arab Emirates, the Gulf state that has mediated several swaps in the war 1. The freed soldiers had been held since 2022, and the released Russians had been held on Belarusian soil 2.

The exchange continues a track that has kept moving even as ceasefire talks stalled. Istanbul Round 2 on 2 June agreed a 1,200-for-1,200 swap , and Ukraine completed the war's largest single exchange, a 1,000-prisoner deal, on 24 May . The Emirati channel has been the constant facilitator across the conflict, producing agreed lists faster than the Russia-Ukraine bilateral track alone. That the released Russians were held in Belarus threads this swap back into the week's Belarus story.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Russia and Ukraine swapped prisoners of war again, 160 soldiers each, on 26 June. The exchange was arranged with help from the United Arab Emirates, which has repeatedly stepped in to broker these swaps throughout the war. The freed Russian soldiers had been held in Belarus rather than Ukraine, a detail that shows how tangled up Belarus has become in the war despite formally staying out of the fighting.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    That freed Russian soldiers were held in Belarus, not Ukraine, underlines how deeply Minsk's territory and personnel are entangled in the war despite formal non-belligerence.

First Reported In

Update #22 · Belarus relays go dark on Kyiv's deadline

The National· 2 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Turkiye
Turkiye
Erdogan followed the Pakistani delegation to Jeddah for an instrument that has not been signed. Ankara's entry widens Saudi Arabia's defence architecture beyond the existing Pakistan pact, adding a second non-Gulf military partner mid-conflict.
Oman
Oman
Muscat is the corridor's broker but has published nothing about the arrangement Fars describes on its behalf. The account leaves Oman administering outbound traffic only, a narrower role than the shared route its mediation has rested on since 1979.
Pakistan
Pakistan
Islamabad sent Sharif, Munir and Dar to Jeddah to widen a defence commitment it has honoured in cheaper registers since March, when Dar invoked the Saudi mutual defence pact. Jeddah tests whether that hedge becomes a binding trilateral instrument with Turkiye.
United States
United States
Washington rejected the Majlis Hormuz bill outright while CENTCOM's own tally kept climbing to 49 vessels redirected since 14 July. Both instruments tightened in the same week Trump promised the strait would reopen soon.
Iran
Iran
Iran's foreign ministry is selling a phased Hormuz corridor through Oman and denying any percentage cargo tariff, while its own Majlis is legislating fines to 20% and a bar on Israeli-linked cargo. The two accounts, from the same government, do not agree with each other.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Riyadh published a target forecast, not an attribution, for the campaign it says the Najran strike previewed. That keeps an Article 51 case available while it formalises a trilateral defence architecture with Pakistan and Turkiye.