Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21JUN

P&I clubs rebuy war-risk cover in three days

2 min read
17:51UTC

Twelve P&I clubs cancelled their regional war-risk extensions after reinsurers pulled their backing, then arranged replacement cover within three days, Lloyd's List reported on 18 August.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

War-risk cover returned within three days at a price set by a week of bad data.

Twelve leading P&I clubs (Protection and Indemnity mutuals, which carry a shipowner's third-party liabilities) cancelled their ancillary regional war-risk extensions after reinsurers, the insurers who take slices of rare catastrophic risk off other insurers, withdrew their backing. The clubs then arranged replacement buyback cover, war-risk insurance repurchased at current market prices, within three days. Lloyd's List reported the sequence in its daily briefing on 18 August 1.

The cancelled class covers specialist war-risk liabilities rather than core Protection and Indemnity, which remained available throughout. Any account of Gulf shipping as uninsured overstates it. The same briefing recorded three ADNOC vessels targeted in the preceding week.

One reading has an insurance market behaving exactly as designed: cover withdrawn the moment the reinsurance layer vanished, cover repurchased at a fresh price seventy-two hours later. The other reading follows a single owner through the week, from continuous cover, to a lapsed policy, to a repriced one. Nobody budgets for that middle stage, and neither reading can be settled from outside the market.

What can be examined is the material the underwriter had when setting the new price. Pricing a Hormuz voyage means pricing the chance of a hit against how many voyages actually take place, and that figure arrived in irreconcilable versions this week. It also means reading a sanctions register whose most recent Iran entry, a 35-party shadow-banking designation dated 14 August, reached the gazette as scanned images rather than machine-readable text . Frequency data and legal data both degraded together, and war-risk premiums travel down the chain into the delivered cost of crude, gas and containerised freight.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Twelve big insurance clubs that cover ships against war risks briefly cancelled some of their extra Gulf-related cover after the companies that back them, called reinsurers, pulled out. Within three days, the clubs found replacement cover and reinstated it. Ordinary insurance for cargo damage or crew injury kept working throughout; only the special war-risk add-on was affected. This matters because insurance is what lets a ship legally sail and get financed. A gap of even a few days can leave a shipowner unable to send a vessel through the strait, and this shows how quickly that cover can now come and go as the conflict continues.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

P&I clubs do not carry Gulf war-risk exposure on their own balance sheets; they buy reinsurance to back it, so a reinsurer pulling its backing forces a club to cancel cover it can no longer itself afford to underwrite, independent of any change in the underlying shipping risk.

The $40 billion US Development Finance Corporation Hormuz reinsurance facility, launched earlier in the conflict, has had zero uptake , meaning the private market has no functioning public backstop to fall back on when a reinsurer withdraws; clubs must find replacement private capacity or go without.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    A three-day cancel-and-rebuy cycle shows Gulf war-risk cover can now disappear and return faster than during earlier phases of the conflict, when whole P&I clubs stayed out for weeks.

First Reported In

Update #172 · The strait nobody can count, insure or pay

Lloyd's List· 19 Aug 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
P&I clubs rebuy war-risk cover in three days
Reinsurer withdrawal sits a layer above anything a shipowner can negotiate, so the new premium is not a matter of shopping around.
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.