Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
25MAY

Anti-war protests across US cities

3 min read
13:55UTC

Protests spread across US cities and reach Athens, where demonstrators demand closure of a NATO base on Crete — the domestic and international opposition to an unauthorised war finding its voice on Day 8.

← Back to Two markets, two prices on one Iran dealJump to analysis ↓
ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The Athens protest's operational significance is its target: Souda Bay is a non-substitutable US-NATO logistics and intelligence hub in the Eastern Mediterranean whose availability ultimately depends on Greek government cooperation that is domestically contestable.

Saturday protests spread across multiple US cities, organised by the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition, American Muslims for Palestine, CodePink, Black Alliance for Peace, and the Democratic Socialists of America. Actress Jane Fonda joined a rally in Los Angeles. In Athens, more than 1,300 demonstrators affiliated with the Communist Party of Greece marched with banners reading "Hands off Iran" and "Close Souda base" — a reference to the NATO naval facility at Souda Bay, Crete, which supports allied operations in the eastern Mediterranean.

The protests acquire their weight from the institutional vacuum behind them. The US House rejected war authorisation 212-219; the Senate rejected it 47-53 , . The Intercept reported that Representative Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) introduced a competing weaker resolution specifically designed to split the bipartisan antiwar Coalition and provide cover for moderate Democrats — a procedural manoeuvre that succeeded in defeating the binding measure while leaving the underlying opposition unresolved. Both chambers have now declined to authorise the conflict. Both chambers have also declined to stop it. The White House has not requested supplemental funding for a campaign the Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated at $891 million per day, of which $3.5 billion in the first 100 hours was unbudgeted , .

The Athens protests carry a different charge. Greece hosts multiple NATO facilities that could support Coalition operations; Souda Bay is among the most capable naval bases in the eastern Mediterranean. Iran's explicit threat to treat European participants as "legitimate targets" landed hours before demonstrators demanded the base's closure — a convergence of Iranian deterrence messaging and European anti-war sentiment that, intentional or not, reinforces the political cost of deeper European involvement.

The pattern across both continents is the same: a war sustained by executive authority against the expressed will of elected legislatures, generating street opposition that has no institutional mechanism to translate into policy. The House and Senate votes failed. The protests have no binding force. The campaign costs accumulate without appropriation. On Day 8, the distance between democratic process and military reality continues to widen, with no actor in a position to close it.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Protests are happening across US cities and in Athens, Greece. In the US, they are organised by peace and progressive groups opposing a war Congress has not formally approved. In Athens, demonstrators from Greece's Communist Party are specifically demanding closure of Souda Bay, a major US-NATO military base in Crete used for logistics, naval operations, and intelligence. While protests rarely close military bases directly, sustained parliamentary pressure can affect bilateral base agreements, and Greece has a documented history of staying out of US-led military campaigns despite NATO membership.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The US protest coalition's breadth reflects structurally distinct grievances converging simultaneously: anti-imperialism, Palestinian solidarity organisations framing Iran as a co-target of coordinated US-Israeli military action, and progressive anti-militarism. The structural driver uniting them is the absence of congressional authorisation, which delegitimises the war across multiple political traditions at once — a condition that took months to develop in the Iraq and Vietnam contexts.

Escalation

The protest movement's composition — spanning DSA, Black Alliance for Peace, and American Muslims for Palestine — is structurally broader than the 2003 Iraq anti-war coalition at the same stage of that conflict. The House authorisation margin (212–219) is narrower than any comparable vote in the Iraq or Afghanistan era: four vote changes flip the result. The DSA has demonstrated primary challenge credibility in urban progressive districts. Street protest is a lagging indicator; the mechanism by which this pressure reaches legislative outcomes is primary challenge threats to marginal Democratic representatives, not aggregate crowd size.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If Greek parliamentary debate over Souda Bay intensifies under KKE pressure, the Greek government may face domestic constraints on extending or upgrading US operational access at the base, complicating Eastern Mediterranean logistics at a critical juncture.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    The 212–219 House margin means the protest coalition needs to shift only four representatives' calculus — through primary challenge threats in marginal districts — to materially change the legislative landscape for ongoing operations.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    A US anti-war coalition broader than the 2003 Iraq movement at the same stage, combined with a war begun without congressional authorisation, creates structural delegitimisation pressure across multiple political traditions simultaneously.

    Medium term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    If Congress eventually restricts or revokes war authority, this conflict would establish the first post-Vietnam precedent for legislative curtailment of an ongoing US military offensive, with significant implications for future presidential war powers.

    Medium term · Suggested
Sources:Al Jazeera·ABC News·ANSWER Coalition
Mentions:White House →Mediterranean →United States →Coalition →The Intercept →National Security Council (Iran) →Los Angeles →Iran →NATO →Souda Bay →Crete →Athens →Center for Strategic and International Studies →Greece →
First Reported In

Update #26 · President orders halt; IRGC ignores him

Al Jazeera· 7 Mar 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
Senate kills war powers check, 47–53
Congressional rejection of war authorisation provides political context for anti-war protests demanding accountability for a conflict begun without legislative approval.
Occurred 4 Mar 2026
Read story →
This Event
Anti-war protests across US cities
The protests reflect a growing disconnect between the war's prosecution and its democratic legitimacy. Congress has voted against authorisation in both chambers. No supplemental funding has been requested for a campaign costing $891 million per day. The street opposition — spanning US anti-war coalitions and European NATO-sceptic movements — is the visible expression of a war being fought without the consent of the legislatures nominally responsible for approving it.
Different Perspectives
Lloyd's of London
Lloyd's of London
The Joint War Committee left Hormuz war-risk premiums at $10-14 million per voyage on 25 May, declining to move on Brent's 5% fall. The JWC's protocol requires a UN Security Council resolution or bilateral government certification letter before de-listing, and neither has arrived: a verbal understanding does not satisfy the formal condition the reinsurance market's treaty terms require.
Gulf Arab producers
Gulf Arab producers
Saudi Arabia and UAE depend on Hormuz for their own crude exports; Aramco CEO Nasser has warned no oil market recovery arrives until 2027 if the blockade continues past mid-June. Monday's $98.96 Brent settlement shortens nothing for Gulf producers without a signed instrument and a Pentagon mine-clearance timeline that runs up to six months post-ceasefire.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar holds $12bn of frozen Iranian assets at the centre of the sequencing dispute but cannot release them without explicit US Treasury authorisation, given the original freeze was a US instrument. As the asset-holding state, Qatar's leverage is real but passive: it is the escrow holder, not the decision-maker, and any resolution requires US Treasury sign-off that Trump has withheld.
Pakistan
Pakistan
With both Prime Minister Sharif and army chief Munir simultaneously in Beijing on 25 May, Pakistan has for the first time consolidated its civilian and military mediation tracks under China's roof. Munir's direct Tehran-to-Beijing flight signals that the security and financial threads of the sequencing problem are now being worked in parallel rather than sequentially.
China
China
Beijing hosted Pakistan's principal mediators and Iran's China envoy Ghalibaf simultaneously on 25 May while its banking regulator capped new state-bank lending to five sanctioned refiners. China is simultaneously the most credible third-party underwriter of the $12bn sequencing and the state whose institutions face live OFAC secondary-sanctions exposure if the deadlock persists through GL V's expiry.
United States
United States
Trump posted on 24 May that the blockade holds until a deal is certified and signed, ruling out the informal MOU structure both sides had been building. The 'certified, and signed' condition is the first operational bar Trump has attached in 87 days, but it arrived without an executive instrument, maintaining the gap between posted ultimatum and signed US policy.