Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Tech Sovereignty
10JUN

Khamenei absent 32 days — longest ever

1 min read
10:31UTC

No video, no audio, no appearance. The longest gap for any Supreme Leader since 1979, and the CIA cannot confirm his condition.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Iran is fighting its largest war without a visible commander-in-chief.

Mojtaba Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Leader, last communicated on 12 March through a written statement read by a state TV anchor. 1 No video or audio has surfaced in the 32 days since, the longest public absence for any Supreme Leader in the republic's history. The CIA is actively searching for proof of his condition .

By comparison, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's longest absence during the Iran-Iraq War was nine days. The silence spans the war's most consequential period: ground forces converging on the Gulf, a cluster warhead deployed for the first time, and two bills (toll legislation, NPT withdrawal) awaiting a Parliament that has not convened in 31 days.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran has a Supreme Leader, currently Mojtaba Khamenei, who holds ultimate authority over war and peace decisions. He has not appeared in public, on video, or on audio for 32 days. His last communication was a written statement read by a news anchor on 12 March. This is the longest disappearance for any Supreme Leader since the Iranian Republic was founded in 1979. By comparison, the previous Supreme Leader vanished for at most nine days during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s. The practical effect is that Iran's most consequential war in decades is being prosecuted without visible supreme command. The IRGC, the military-political organisation that runs Iran's armed forces, appears to be making decisions without authorisation from above.

First Reported In

Update #53 · Trump drops Hormuz goal; toll becomes law

Axios· 31 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud providers gain a binding procurement mandate from CADA, confirmed by Gartner's $12.6bn sovereign-cloud figure for 2026. The $40bn Pax Silica commitment signals Brussels will not extend sovereignty discipline to the silicon layer, and the missing €350m Sovereign Tech Fund leaves open-source maintenance infrastructure unfunded beneath those same clouds.
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Science Secretary Kendall's £1.1bn Hardware Plan on 8 June chose demand-side instruments, advancing £150m to British chip startups via the British Business Bank, where Brussels chose supply-side alliance membership. Britain joined Pax Silica before the EU and has no collective EU procurement leverage; the Hardware Plan is the bilateral answer to the same silicon gap.
United States
United States
Pax Silica, a State Department initiative launched in December 2025, secured EU membership the same afternoon Brussels adopted its cloud sovereignty law. Ambassador Puzder had named CADA a red line against the EU-US trade framework; the narrowed CADA scope and the $40bn chip commitment together represent the settlement Washington sought.
France
France
France was the only EU state to oppose Pax Silica accession at COREPER on 3 June, asking the Commission to clarify the Council's steering role inside the alliance. Paris backed CADA and hosts Mistral AI; a $40bn US-chip commitment contractually narrows the commercial space for the sovereign AI model that France is trying to scale.
European Commission
European Commission
Von der Leyen framed CADA on 3 June as keeping 'most of our market open to like-minded partners', and the Commission's EVP Virkkunen simultaneously required majority-European ownership for the €4.12bn AI Gigafactories call. Brussels is managing rather than resolving the silicon dependency by asserting regulatory control at the cloud layer while formalising the chip relationship through Pax Silica.
European Central Bank
European Central Bank
The ECB's digital euro pilot drew more than 50 PSP applications and is naming 10 to 30 participants in July, advancing on its own monetary mandate without requiring a Commission act. Its trajectory this week is the inverse of CAIDA's: the sovereignty instrument that restricts no US firm is the only one keeping its published calendar.