Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
31JUL

Carbon sits still as gas and power dive

2 min read
09:33UTC

EUA December-2026 allowances closed at EUR 83.51/tonne on 27 July against EUR 83.40 on the 24th, a move of 0.01 per cent, through the sharpest four sessions of the cycle.

← Back to Insurers shut Bab el-Mandeb to Saudi hullsJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Carbon moved a hundredth of a per cent while gas and power collapsed around it.

EUA December-2026 carbon allowances closed at EUR 83.51/tonne on Monday 27 July against EUR 83.40 on Friday the 24th, a change of 0.01 per cent. 1 2 Both prints are aggregator quotes on the EEX December-2026 contract rather than exchange settlement prints, and the aggregators disagree with each other: one secondary report gave EUR 83.88 for the 24 July session, another a EUR 80.01 to EUR 81.07 range for the same day. 3 The two dedicated data services agree; the rest do not. Carbon has been range-bound for a fortnight, having drifted back under EUR 81 in mid-July before recovering .

Hold that still print against what the other two spark inputs did across the identical four sessions. Gas handed back the war premium it had built on Gulf risk. German power lost more than two fifths of its value on a wind surge. Carbon moved by a hundredth of a per cent. This desk asked last week whether the carbon leg might ease the pressure on the spark . It did not, and it did not add to it either.

That flatness is doing analytical work. A single de-escalation trade would have pulled carbon with it, because a cheaper-gas world implies more coal-to-gas switching and firmer allowance demand at the margin. Carbon not moving says the market did not process the week as one story. It processed a geopolitical unwind in the fuel leg and a weather event in the revenue leg, and it correctly declined to price either as a change in Europe's emissions trajectory. For anyone modelling the spark, carbon is the input that has held still through every shock this cycle, which makes it the one whose eventual move will not be priced in advance.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Companies that burn fossil fuels in Europe have to buy a permit for every tonne of carbon dioxide they release. The price of that permit, called EUA carbon, barely moved this week even though the price of gas and the price of electricity both swung hard. That is because the carbon permit market runs on its own separate calendar, tied to European Union rules about how many permits exist each year, not to the day-to-day news that moves gas and power prices.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

EUA's own supply schedule, auction calendars and free-allocation cuts, is fixed months in advance, so the price only moves on new regulatory news rather than on daily gas or power prints; that is a structurally different price-formation process from TTF, which reacts to real-time flow data and geopolitical risk.

With no cap revision, auction change or CBAM announcement landing in this four-session window, carbon had no input to react to, which is why it held flat while two inputs that do react to daily news, gas and power, moved 8 and 41 per cent respectively.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Carbon's inertia through both directions of this week's gas and power swing shows the ETS cap, not fuel news, is currently the dominant input on the allowance price.

Sources:TradingEconomics·Investing.com·Prestige Business Solutions
Mentions:EUA →EEX →TTF →European Union →
First Reported In

Update #30 · Wind, not peace, sank the German spark

TradingEconomics· 27 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
Spark stays negative, French edge erodes
TTF and EUA rose together on 22 July (ID:5233); by 27 July gas and power had both reversed sharply while carbon alone held flat, splitting the prior joint move.
Occurred 22 Jul 2026
Read story →
This Event
Carbon sits still as gas and power dive
Carbon holding flat while both other spark inputs collapsed is the cleanest evidence that two separate shocks hit, not one de-escalation trade.
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.