Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Energy Markets
1JUN

Italy-France day-ahead spread hits EUR 153/MWh

3 min read
08:52UTC

Italy-France day-ahead electricity spread reached EUR 153/MWh on Sunday 26 April, with France clearing at EUR -43.73/MWh and Italy at EUR 109.38/MWh. Germany cleared at EUR 1.49/MWh on strong wind and solar.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

France cleared negative while Italy cleared above EUR 109/MWh on 26 April, an interconnector constraint outside the gas curve.

The day-ahead electricity spread between Italy and France reached EUR 153/MWh on Sunday 26 April, with the French zone clearing at EUR -43.73/MWh and the Italian zone at EUR 109.38/MWh 1. Germany cleared at EUR 1.49/MWh on strong wind and solar output.

Negative power prices in the French zone alongside three-figure positive prices in Italy on the same delivery day says the Franco-Italian interconnector was constrained on the limit on Sunday. The day-ahead market is the European power market that clears for next-day delivery on national zonal coupling; spreads of this magnitude across an HVDC link are normally the indicator that one zone has surplus renewable output the link cannot evacuate, while the receiving zone runs gas peakers to cover residual demand.

The trade implication is that Italian power-sector gas demand on a renewable-rich Sunday is still bound by the interconnector envelope rather than by the TTF benchmark. Italian gas storage sits at 48.15% fill, the leading large EU storage market; even with a comfortable inventory position, day-ahead power separates from the gas curve when the link binds. For procurement desks pricing Italian forward power against TTF spot, the EUR 153/MWh spread is a constraint not in the curve and not in recent ENTSOG or ACER coverage. The same constraint matters for EDF's French nuclear export envelope through summer 2026 , since France clearing negative on a Sunday means renewables and nuclear together exceed both domestic demand and the link's evacuation capacity. Southern European industrial users pay a constraint premium that the gas-side balance does not show, and the same dynamic is what gives Bruegel's Spain evidence credibility: when renewables clear the local zonal price, the interconnector becomes the binding constraint, not the marginal gas plant.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Day-ahead power prices are the prices electricity generators and buyers agree for power delivered the following day. On 26 April, power in France was essentially free, France had more wind and solar generation than it could use, so prices went negative at minus EUR 43.73 per megawatt-hour. Germany was also nearly free at EUR 1.49, also on strong renewables. But Italy cleared at EUR 109.38 per megawatt-hour, a difference of EUR 153 from France. This happens when the cable and grid connections between France and Italy cannot carry enough power across the border to equalise prices. Cheap French power is physically stranded on the French side, while Italian power plants charge full price. The constraint is a known infrastructure problem; the upgrade to fix it is not scheduled until 2027.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    The EUR 153/MWh Italy-France spread is not reflected in Italian power forward curves, meaning Italian industrial buyers and retailers with 2026 fixed-price supply contracts face unhedged exposure if the constraint recurs on high-renewable output days.

First Reported In

Update #5 · Ban day muted; Germany doubles injection rate

euenergy.live· 26 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Italy-France day-ahead spread hits EUR 153/MWh
An interconnector constraint of this size between two of Europe's largest power markets sits outside the gas curve and outside recent storage coverage; southern European industrial users carry a premium that headline benchmarks miss.
Different Perspectives
Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp gas trading desks
Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp gas trading desks
TTF failing to sustain EUR 47-plus with 51 mcm/day of Norwegian supply offline confirms EUR 50 as a diplomatic ceiling rather than a physical floor; the curve is priced as a Troll-restart long, not a storage-deficit short. Winter Cal-26 long versus summer TTF short is the structural position FNB Gas's broken-mechanism verdict supports.
European Commission and DG Energy
European Commission and DG Energy
The Commission lowered the mandatory fill target from 90% to 80% and published the 11 May ETS benchmark revision saving industry EUR 4 billion, choosing industrial competitiveness over storage ambition at the moment physical injection margins narrowed. Berlin's confirmation of no summer injection scheme came with no Commission counter-instrument.
Hungarian and Slovak industrial offtakers
Hungarian and Slovak industrial offtakers
Hungary and Slovakia pay a EUR 2-plus delivered-gas premium over TTF benchmark prices regardless of ACER's improved pipeline-congestion reading, and both are litigating the 17 June EU pipeline ban at the CJEU (ID:3229). A post-17 June tightening of TurkStream supply would widen that basis further.
EBN and Dutch state
EBN and Dutch state
The Dutch state trebled EBN's mandate from 25 to 80 TWh, leaving EBN the sole active Dutch injector after the January auctions drew zero commercial bookings (ID:3637). The EUR 233m state budget cap is the binding cost ceiling; above-market injection at EBN is a fiscal transfer, not a market outcome.
CRE and French gas operators
CRE and French gas operators
France's 100% mandatory CRE booking order is carrying French injection regardless of the inverted strip, providing EU aggregate cover that Germany's abolished levy cannot supply. The order renews annually on CRE decision, making it a political risk rather than a structural guarantee.
FNB Gas and German TSOs
FNB Gas and German TSOs
FNB Gas formally declared the market-based storage-refill framework broken on 27 May, citing zero-clearing January auctions, ten days after Berlin ruled out any summer injection scheme. The intervention sets the institutional predicate for reintroducing a storage levy; the Gasspeicherumlage precedent (2022-25) confirms the administrative path is open.