Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Energy Markets
13APR

TTF settles EUR 46.44 inside tight weekly range

3 min read
22:33UTC

TTF held EUR 43.4 to 47.4/MWh across the week to 4 May, settling EUR 46.44 on Monday. Month-to-date down 7.27%, year-on-year up 40.53%; the France-Germany power spread held at EUR 55.75.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

TTF held a EUR 4 weekly range while the France-Germany May-26 power spread stayed at EUR 55.75/MWh.

TTF front-month closed at EUR 46.44/MWh on the Monday 4 May session, inside a weekly range of EUR 43.4 to 47.4/MWh per ICE data 1. Month-to-date the contract is down 7.27%; year-on-year it is up 40.53%. The France May-26 power contract traded at EUR 21.80/MWh versus Germany May-26 at EUR 77.55/MWh; the EUR 55.75 spread first flagged on 28 April held through 4 May with no compression.

A tight weekly range is what European desks expect when the supply book is settled. The settled read holds across two prior anchors: the EUR 41.67/MWh six-week low on 17 April and the recovery after Iran's re-closure of Hormuz . The weekly range across 30 April to 4 May sits inside both of those reference points, and that compression is what makes the divergence with the storage-pace data sharp rather than incremental.

France's nuclear-led baseload prints at EUR 21.80/MWh while Germany's gas-and-renewables mix prints at EUR 77.55/MWh, and the EUR 55.75 spread has held without compression for nearly a week. That persistence indicates the spread is structural rather than a one-session dislocation; it tracks the underlying generation mix and the gas-to-power transmission channel rather than near-term wind or temperature noise. The TTF range and the power spread together describe a market reading aggregate supply as resolved and the bilateral generation-mix gap as durable.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

France and Germany are connected by high-voltage electricity cables. France generates a lot of cheap nuclear power, but the cables between the two countries can only carry a limited amount. As a result, electricity in France is much cheaper than in Germany right now, France's May contract is around 21 euros per megawatt-hour, Germany's is 77 euros. The 55-euro gap has held steady all week. This gap matters because it shows how fragmented the European electricity market is: cheap power in one country cannot automatically offset expensive power in a neighbouring one, and German industry pays far more for electricity than French industry does.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    German gas-to-power generation bidding at EUR 70-80/MWh marginal cost into the balancing market sustains gas demand from power generation through May, reducing the volume available for storage injection and putting indirect upward pressure on TTF spot.

  • Opportunity

    If the Aurora forecast of spread compression by late May proves correct, German solar hours lengthening from May, gas-to-power demand falls and frees up TTF supply for storage injection, narrowing the pace gap from the power-generation side.

First Reported In

Update #7 · Storage pace 0.21 vs 0.257; floor not yet met

Trading Economics / ICE· 4 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Amsterdam-Rotterdam gas trading desks
Amsterdam-Rotterdam gas trading desks
TTF failing to sustain EUR 47+ with 51 mcm/day of Norwegian capacity offline confirms EUR 50 as a diplomatic ceiling; the curve is a Troll-restart long, and EBN's EUR 233 million mandate budget cap is a known limit on price-insensitive prompt buying.
ARERA
ARERA
Italy's energy regulator is running mandatory storage injection that carries the EU aggregate trajectory alongside CRE and EBN, while Italian industrial consumers at Panigaglia face a simultaneously low-utilisation terminal and a EUR 2/MWh delivered-cost basis above TTF. The mandate funds security of supply at the expense of Italian competitiveness.
Shell
Shell
As a long-term Russian LNG contract holder, Shell faces a replacement procurement problem concentrated in Q3-Q4 2026 ahead of the 1 January 2027 double cliff; with terminal booking lead times running weeks, the real deadline is late November 2026 and no replacement supply has been publicly named.
CRE
CRE
France's 100% mandatory booking order funds injection regardless of the inverted strip, providing the EU aggregate cover that Germany's abolished levy cannot; the CRE order is renewed annually, making it a political risk rather than a structural guarantee. That dependency exposes the EU injection trajectory to French electoral cycles.
Bundesnetzagentur
Bundesnetzagentur
Germany's regulator holds the early-warning gas stage active with no statutory instrument to compel commercial injection, and Berlin confirmed on 20 May it will introduce no summer incentive scheme; Germany is the EU's only major unincentivised storage market after the levy lapsed on 1 January 2026. The mandate gap is carried by three other member states.
European Commission
European Commission
The Commission relaxed the mandatory fill target from 90% to 80% and published an ETS benchmark revision saving industry EUR 4 billion, choosing industrial competitiveness over both climate and storage ambition at the moment physical margins are tightest. Both decisions reduce policy pressure at the exact week the trajectory margin narrowed to 45 GWh/day.