17JUN

Indiana counties turn pauses into bans

1 min read

10:13UTC

Marshall and Cass counties banned new data centres outright, with no end date, part of roughly 30 of Indiana's 92 counties now restricting a build-out they once merely paused.

← Back to Virginia taxes the backup, not the draw Jump to analysis ↓

IndustryDeveloping

Key takeaway

Two Indiana counties replaced temporary pauses with permanent data-centre bans, removing the reopening date moratoria always kept.

Marshall and Cass counties in Indiana have banned new data centres outright rather than pausing them, part of roughly 30 of the state's 92 counties now restricting development. ¹ A moratorium sets a clock; a ban does not. That distinction marks the shift, because it removes the reopening date every earlier Indiana pause carried.

The move escalates a county-by-county trend the beat has counted for months. In June, Boone County became Indiana's twelfth to pass a one-year moratorium ; Marshall and Cass set no end date at all. Roughly a third of the state's counties now sit somewhere on the spectrum from pause to prohibition.

The bans do not touch the demand. Governor Mike Braun is still selling Indiana to hyperscalers, a state-level pitch that runs directly against the counties now shutting them out. That split, a governor recruiting the load while local boards refuse it, is the shape the Indiana fight has settled into.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Two more Indiana counties, Marshall and Cass, have gone further than most: instead of pausing new data centres for a year or two while they write rules, they have banned them outright, with no plan to revisit the decision. Around a third of Indiana's 92 counties now restrict data centres in some way. No governor or state law forced this decision. Each of Indiana's 92 counties is deciding on its own, so the state's data-centre map is becoming a patchwork of banned, paused and open areas rather than one statewide policy.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Marshall and Cass counties chose outright bans rather than the moratoria most of Indiana's other restricting counties adopted because a moratorium requires the county to eventually write zoning rules that let some future project through; a ban carries no such obligation and needs no follow-up ordinance, making it the structurally simpler tool for a county with no active project to actually manage.

Indiana's fragmented pattern, roughly a third of its 92 counties now restricting development with no state law or governor's action behind any of it, exists because Indiana zoning authority sits almost entirely at the county level. Unlike New York's single executive order, no one Indianapolis decision can freeze the state, so each county reaches its own answer at its own pace.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Developers face a state where roughly a third of counties are permanently closed rather than temporarily paused, narrowing the map for new Indiana campuses.

Sources:WFYI

Mentions:Marshall County, Indiana →Indianapolis →Boone County →Mike Braun →Cass County, Indiana →

First Reported In

Update #10 · New York freezes data centres by decree

WFYI· 15 Jul 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Indiana freezes its 12th county on AI

Marshall and Cass counties' outright bans escalate past Boone County's earlier one-year moratorium, Indiana's 12th such vote.

Occurred 15 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

Indiana counties turn pauses into bans

Indiana's data-centre backlash has hardened from temporary moratoria into permanent bans across a third of its counties.

Different Perspectives

Government of Odisha

Odisha signed a $1.5bn agreement with HCLTech and Sarvam AI on 24 July for a sovereign AI data centre in Bhubaneswar, targeting 2028 operations. While regulators elsewhere price developers out of the queue, Odisha is bidding state financial assistance to bring capacity in, betting the AI infrastructure boom is worth courting rather than rationing.

Switch Datacenters and Uithoorn

The developer, the municipality, Liander and dozens of greenhouse growers signed a waste-heat agreement letting a 60 MVA facility proceed under a provincial rule that bans sites above 5 MVA. The public-interest exception argues the site relieves rather than adds to grid congestion, working around a standing ban from inside rather than waiting for it to change.

Iskandar Puteri residents

Residents protested in February over falling water pressure they attribute to ZDATA's 300 MW construction; ZDATA disputes causation and has not yet resolved the dispute with its wastewater-only pivot. The complaint sits unadjudicated while the operator advertises compliance to state authorities the residents cannot address directly.

Microsoft

DC Byte reports Microsoft looking to the Nordics for new capacity while Dublin's regional share falls to 15 per cent, though this is a market-intelligence inference rather than a company statement. Microsoft keeps its existing Dublin cloud region, which is costly to relocate, while directing new investment where power is cheaper and the queue is shorter.

ISO New England

ISO-NE proposed excluding new large loads from its Installed Capacity Requirement entirely, forcing data centres to bring their own generation or accept curtailment, even though New England's demand has been flat or falling for a decade. The reform is pre-emptive, written before the region has felt the strain PJM and MISO already report.

Ofgem

Ofgem opened its Data Centre Commitment Fee consultation on 29 July, arguing that free options on grid capacity let developers bank places on ten sites and abandon nine, crowding out projects that would build. It expects the deposit to filter the queue before the rule even takes final form.