Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
17JUN

Five US moratorium votes in seven days

4 min read
10:13UTC

Camden County Georgia enacted a 9-month freeze on Tuesday 5 May; Normal Illinois, Denver, Seattle and Minneapolis all hold their own moratorium votes in the week beginning Friday 15 May.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

Maine's veto pushed the moratorium fight below the state line, and five separate councils now decide it in seven days.

Camden County, Georgia enacted a 9-month data-centre moratorium on Tuesday 5 May, the first local pause in a state operators had treated as a clean political runway 1. Normal, Illinois voted on a 6-month pause on Friday 15 May. Denver votes Monday 18 May on a one-year moratorium that would take effect three days later if approved. Seattle's Parks and City Light Committee and Land Use and Sustainability Committee both meet on Wednesday 20 May to vote on the 365-day freeze introduced on 30 April after City Light received 369 MW of new connection requests . Minneapolis votes Thursday 21 May, alongside Minnesota's HF 4888 statewide pause. South Dakota's SB 135, which authorises local governments to ban data-centre construction outright, has already passed.

The vote calendar lands two weeks after Maine Governor Janet Mills vetoed LD 307 and the House sustained the veto on Wednesday 29 April . The veto did not slow the movement; it relocated it to a jurisdictional layer where no single industry lobbying campaign can contain it. Good Jobs First tracks 11 active state bills and dozens of enacted local pauses; the datacenterbans.com tracker now updates weekly. The South Dakota authorisation model is the most consequential of the lot: a state legislature voluntarily ceding the right to pre-empt local bans converts every county hearing into a potentially binding moratorium vote.

The industry's communications case rests on the job-creation argument used in Camden County and lost. A commissioned hyperscale campus typically employs a few dozen staff, a figure that maps poorly onto the construction-jobs framing that builds local political support for refineries or auto plants. Lobbying capacity built to contest one state house at a time now has to run dozens of city-council fights in parallel, with the tax-abatement case making a weaker showing at municipal scale than under a state-level subsidy umbrella. The 18-21 May results will signal whether Camden County is the lead indicator or the outlier.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Cities across the United States are voting on whether to stop new data centres being built in their areas, at least temporarily. Camden County in Georgia voted yes in early May. Normal in Illinois, Denver, Seattle and Minneapolis all had votes scheduled within a single week in May 2026. This wave of local opposition follows a failed attempt to get a statewide ban in Maine: the governor vetoed that bill in late April. When the state-level route closed, opponents moved to city and county level instead, where each local council can make its own rules. A Gallup poll found that 71% of Americans oppose having a data centre built near them.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The shift from state to municipal is driven by two structural features of US land-use law. First, data-centre zoning is almost universally a local planning function: state economic-development agencies can offer subsidies but cannot override local zoning boards on permitted use.

Second, municipal utilities, particularly those with public ownership like Seattle City Light, give city councils a direct service-denial lever that bypasses the planning system entirely, connecting the moratorium to utility infrastructure rather than zoning law.

The tax-abatement case that industry communications rely on is also weaker at municipal scale: state-level abatements are negotiated by economic-development agencies with year-round staff and multi-year modelling capacity. Municipal councils face the same developers with far less institutional preparation, and the Camden County result suggests the Loudoun tax-abatement playbook does not transfer without the subsidy infrastructure behind it.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Industry lobbying capacity, built for one state legislature at a time, must now contest dozens of simultaneous city and county hearings with no single coordinating authority.

    Short term · 0.85
  • Risk

    South Dakota SB 135's pre-emption waiver model, if adopted by further state legislatures, removes the fallback that industry has relied on when losing local fights.

    Medium term · 0.7
  • Precedent

    A majority of 'no' votes across the 18-21 May calendar would establish a municipal moratorium posture as the default US local response to large data-centre proposals, regardless of state policy.

    Short term · 0.65
First Reported In

Update #3 · OpenAI cuts $800bn; rivals double down

MultiState· 16 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Government of Odisha
Government of Odisha
Odisha signed a $1.5bn agreement with HCLTech and Sarvam AI on 24 July for a sovereign AI data centre in Bhubaneswar, targeting 2028 operations. While regulators elsewhere price developers out of the queue, Odisha is bidding state financial assistance to bring capacity in, betting the AI infrastructure boom is worth courting rather than rationing.
Switch Datacenters and Uithoorn
Switch Datacenters and Uithoorn
The developer, the municipality, Liander and dozens of greenhouse growers signed a waste-heat agreement letting a 60 MVA facility proceed under a provincial rule that bans sites above 5 MVA. The public-interest exception argues the site relieves rather than adds to grid congestion, working around a standing ban from inside rather than waiting for it to change.
Iskandar Puteri residents
Iskandar Puteri residents
Residents protested in February over falling water pressure they attribute to ZDATA's 300 MW construction; ZDATA disputes causation and has not yet resolved the dispute with its wastewater-only pivot. The complaint sits unadjudicated while the operator advertises compliance to state authorities the residents cannot address directly.
Microsoft
Microsoft
DC Byte reports Microsoft looking to the Nordics for new capacity while Dublin's regional share falls to 15 per cent, though this is a market-intelligence inference rather than a company statement. Microsoft keeps its existing Dublin cloud region, which is costly to relocate, while directing new investment where power is cheaper and the queue is shorter.
ISO New England
ISO New England
ISO-NE proposed excluding new large loads from its Installed Capacity Requirement entirely, forcing data centres to bring their own generation or accept curtailment, even though New England's demand has been flat or falling for a decade. The reform is pre-emptive, written before the region has felt the strain PJM and MISO already report.
Ofgem
Ofgem
Ofgem opened its Data Centre Commitment Fee consultation on 29 July, arguing that free options on grid capacity let developers bank places on ten sites and abandon nine, crowding out projects that would build. It expects the deposit to filter the queue before the rule even takes final form.