Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
17JUN

A third of Indiana counties resist

2 min read
10:13UTC

Roughly 30 of Indiana's 92 counties now restrict data centres, up from 12 three weeks earlier, while Indianapolis voted 5-3 to write zoning rules rather than pause approvals outright.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

Indiana's counties are restricting data centres faster than any statehouse could, one board at a time.

Roughly 30 of Indiana's 92 counties now restrict data centres, up from 12 three weeks earlier, the fastest county-level acceleration this sector has recorded. 1 The most recent baseline was Boone County's one-year moratorium on 15 June, then the twelfth such jurisdiction in the state . In the weeks since, counties have watched their neighbours and acted in turn, with no statehouse behind them.

Indianapolis broke the pattern. Its Metropolitan Development Commission, the body that regulates zoning in the state capital, voted 5-3 on 1 July to advance new siting rules rather than freeze approvals outright. Residents at the hearing had pressed for a full moratorium while those rules were drafted; the split vote shows how contested even the middle path has become.

Thirty counties acting independently is harder for an operator to fight than one state bill, because there is no single defendant to sue and no single veto pen to lobby. A statehouse ban leaves one target; a patchwork of ordinances leaves dozens, each cheap to pass and slow to overturn. That is the structural reason the centre of gravity in this fight keeps sliding downward, from federal curtailment to state tax to county zoning.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Almost a third of Indiana's counties, roughly 30 out of 92, now have some kind of rule blocking or slowing new data centres, about triple the number from just three weeks earlier. This isn't one state law. Each county board makes its own decision, which is why the rules vary so much from place to place. Indianapolis took a softer path, voting narrowly to write stricter zoning rules instead of banning new projects outright while those rules are drafted.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Indiana's restrictions have no single author because the state legislature never wrote a statewide framework for data-centre siting; zoning authority over industrial land sits with county commissions by default, so each county is independently discovering the same gap and closing it with the only tool it has, a moratorium ordinance.

Indianapolis's Metropolitan Development Commission took the one path Indiana's zoning code makes available short of an outright ban: a 5-3 vote to write new rules rather than pause approvals, converting a political fight over whether to build into a technical fight over the rules a project must meet.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    Indiana's county-by-county wave gives other states without statewide moratorium bills a template that needs no legislative consensus to copy.

  • Risk

    Fragmented county rules give operators an incentive to site projects in the roughly two-thirds of counties with no restriction yet, concentrating rather than reducing total build-out.

First Reported In

Update #9 · US data-centre backlash becomes law

WFYI· 7 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Government of Odisha
Government of Odisha
Odisha signed a $1.5bn agreement with HCLTech and Sarvam AI on 24 July for a sovereign AI data centre in Bhubaneswar, targeting 2028 operations. While regulators elsewhere price developers out of the queue, Odisha is bidding state financial assistance to bring capacity in, betting the AI infrastructure boom is worth courting rather than rationing.
Switch Datacenters and Uithoorn
Switch Datacenters and Uithoorn
The developer, the municipality, Liander and dozens of greenhouse growers signed a waste-heat agreement letting a 60 MVA facility proceed under a provincial rule that bans sites above 5 MVA. The public-interest exception argues the site relieves rather than adds to grid congestion, working around a standing ban from inside rather than waiting for it to change.
Iskandar Puteri residents
Iskandar Puteri residents
Residents protested in February over falling water pressure they attribute to ZDATA's 300 MW construction; ZDATA disputes causation and has not yet resolved the dispute with its wastewater-only pivot. The complaint sits unadjudicated while the operator advertises compliance to state authorities the residents cannot address directly.
Microsoft
Microsoft
DC Byte reports Microsoft looking to the Nordics for new capacity while Dublin's regional share falls to 15 per cent, though this is a market-intelligence inference rather than a company statement. Microsoft keeps its existing Dublin cloud region, which is costly to relocate, while directing new investment where power is cheaper and the queue is shorter.
ISO New England
ISO New England
ISO-NE proposed excluding new large loads from its Installed Capacity Requirement entirely, forcing data centres to bring their own generation or accept curtailment, even though New England's demand has been flat or falling for a decade. The reform is pre-emptive, written before the region has felt the strain PJM and MISO already report.
Ofgem
Ofgem
Ofgem opened its Data Centre Commitment Fee consultation on 29 July, arguing that free options on grid capacity let developers bank places on ten sites and abandon nine, crowding out projects that would build. It expects the deposit to filter the queue before the rule even takes final form.