Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
2JUN

Johor halts data-centre approvals after water protest

2 min read
10:42UTC

Johor stopped approving Tier 1 and Tier 2 data centres after Malaysia's first water-rights protest at a facility; SCMP reports applicants are being told to wait for water connections until mid-2027.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

Johor's halt imports a UN human-rights framework into South East Asian data-centre regulation.

Johor, the Malaysian state hosting most of the country's data-centre investment, halted approvals for Tier 1 and Tier 2 facilities in late April 2026 after the country's first water-rights protest at a data-centre facility. The Diplomat reported the halt on 27 April, framing the underlying community challenge under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. SCMP reported that applicants are being told to wait for water connections until mid-2027, an effective 14-month freeze for any project not already in the pipeline.

The Diplomat's invocation of the UN framework sits at the centre of the structural change. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, adopted by the UN Human Rights Council in 2011, set a corporate responsibility to respect human rights including the right to water under General Comment 15. The Diplomat's invocation of the framework places Johor's halt in the same legal-conceptual category as the Milwaukee Riverkeeper action against Microsoft's Mount Pleasant campus in Wisconsin , where a water-disclosure non-disclosure clause was broken by litigation. The framework does not mandate a particular regulatory outcome; it changes the disclosure obligations and the legal vocabulary available to communities challenging individual sites.

Johor matters because of where it sits in the Asia-Pacific compute map. The state hosts data-centre investment from AirTrunk, Equinix, Bridge Data Centres, GDS, and several Singaporean and Chinese hyperscalers, drawn across the causeway by Singapore's own moratorium and by Johor's lower power costs. A 14-month water-connection freeze rebalances site selection toward Indonesia (Batam, Bintan), the Philippines, and Vietnam, all of which carry their own water-stress and grid-stability constraints. The halt is unlikely to produce a permanent freeze, given the economic-development pressure inside the Malaysian state government, but the precedent of a UN-framework community challenge surviving long enough to alter approvals is the new regional baseline.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Johor is a Malaysian state just across the Johor Strait from Singapore. It has become popular with data centre companies because electricity is cheap and it sits next to Singapore's major internet infrastructure. Data centres use large amounts of water for cooling, especially in a hot and humid climate like Malaysia's, where the cooling systems run harder than in cooler countries. A local community held the country's first protest specifically about data centre water use, and authorities responded by pausing new data centre approvals until mid-2027, affecting both major (Tier 1) and medium-sized (Tier 2) projects. A policy journal, The Diplomat, reported the case as a human-rights issue about who has the right to access clean water when industrial users compete with local communities.

First Reported In

Update #2 · Maine veto, Seattle freeze, $725bn capex

The Diplomat· 6 May 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Johor halts data-centre approvals after water protest
South East Asia's emerging hyperscaler hub now has a live regulatory and human-rights risk; the UN Guiding Principles framing changes the disclosure regime developers face.
Different Perspectives
Singapore / IMDA
Singapore / IMDA
IMDA's Green Data Centre Roadmap releases 500 MW under non-negotiable PUE 1.3, liquid-cooling, and green-energy conditions set before construction, ending a seven-year freeze without triggering the consent or cost fights fragmenting three US regulatory fronts simultaneously.
US residential electricity ratepayers and community residents
US residential electricity ratepayers and community residents
Households in PJM's 13 states face grid-reinforcement costs defaulting to their bills if states miss the September deadline, while Lake Anna residents face a cooling-water permit that can clear Virginia law without any PFAS monitoring. Both costs are externalised at the regulatory stage and disputed only after the fact.
EdgeConneX in Italy (EU market)
EdgeConneX in Italy (EU market)
EdgeConneX committed €3bn to Italian data-centre capacity starting in 2026, routing capital to a jurisdiction where AI Act and NIS2 mandates create structural demand for EU-resident compute and the government actively attracts investment; Virginia's fiscal standoff and US moratoriums are redirecting pipeline offshore.
Enbridge and Baker Hughes (firmed-power and oilfield-services suppliers)
Enbridge and Baker Hughes (firmed-power and oilfield-services suppliers)
Enbridge committed $1.2bn to Wyoming solar-plus-storage for Meta and Baker Hughes redirected oilfield drilling capacity into enhanced geothermal in New Mexico; both companies are routing capital away from fossil infrastructure into data-centre power procurement at precisely the moment BTM gas became a federal curtailment target.
US federal regulators (DOE and FERC)
US federal regulators (DOE and FERC)
DOE reached for Section 202(c) twice in five months naming the same BTM load class, while FERC rejected PJM's bid to redefine the 20 MW co-located load threshold in April; together they have treated private data-centre generation as a dispatchable grid resource before the permanent RM26-4-000 rule settling its legal status has been written.
European energy regulators and climate advocates
European energy regulators and climate advocates
GE Vernova's 100 GW gas-turbine backlog, driven by AI data-centre demand, puts IEA net-zero pathways under pressure: 15-27 GW of onsite gas is forecast for US data centres by 2030. The Amazon Boardman $20.5m pollution settlement gives environmental litigation a financial template it previously lacked.