Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
14AUG

A third of Indiana counties resist

2 min read
10:48UTC

Roughly 30 of Indiana's 92 counties now restrict data centres, up from 12 three weeks earlier, while Indianapolis voted 5-3 to write zoning rules rather than pause approvals outright.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

Indiana's counties are restricting data centres faster than any statehouse could, one board at a time.

Roughly 30 of Indiana's 92 counties now restrict data centres, up from 12 three weeks earlier, the fastest county-level acceleration this sector has recorded. 1 The most recent baseline was Boone County's one-year moratorium on 15 June, then the twelfth such jurisdiction in the state . In the weeks since, counties have watched their neighbours and acted in turn, with no statehouse behind them.

Indianapolis broke the pattern. Its Metropolitan Development Commission, the body that regulates zoning in the state capital, voted 5-3 on 1 July to advance new siting rules rather than freeze approvals outright. Residents at the hearing had pressed for a full moratorium while those rules were drafted; the split vote shows how contested even the middle path has become.

Thirty counties acting independently is harder for an operator to fight than one state bill, because there is no single defendant to sue and no single veto pen to lobby. A statehouse ban leaves one target; a patchwork of ordinances leaves dozens, each cheap to pass and slow to overturn. That is the structural reason the centre of gravity in this fight keeps sliding downward, from federal curtailment to state tax to county zoning.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Almost a third of Indiana's counties, roughly 30 out of 92, now have some kind of rule blocking or slowing new data centres, about triple the number from just three weeks earlier. This isn't one state law. Each county board makes its own decision, which is why the rules vary so much from place to place. Indianapolis took a softer path, voting narrowly to write stricter zoning rules instead of banning new projects outright while those rules are drafted.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Indiana's restrictions have no single author because the state legislature never wrote a statewide framework for data-centre siting; zoning authority over industrial land sits with county commissions by default, so each county is independently discovering the same gap and closing it with the only tool it has, a moratorium ordinance.

Indianapolis's Metropolitan Development Commission took the one path Indiana's zoning code makes available short of an outright ban: a 5-3 vote to write new rules rather than pause approvals, converting a political fight over whether to build into a technical fight over the rules a project must meet.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    Indiana's county-by-county wave gives other states without statewide moratorium bills a template that needs no legislative consensus to copy.

  • Risk

    Fragmented county rules give operators an incentive to site projects in the roughly two-thirds of counties with no restriction yet, concentrating rather than reducing total build-out.

First Reported In

Update #9 · US data-centre backlash becomes law

WFYI· 7 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Antel, Uruguay's state telecom
Antel, Uruguay's state telecom
Antel will build a $70m AI data centre in Canelones, announced after an 11-12 August Council of Ministers meeting, with construction from Q1 2027 and roughly 250 direct jobs. Uruguay is putting a sovereign AI facility on the state balance sheet rather than courting a hyperscaler to build one.
Comtel
Comtel
Comtel is building a Figline Valdarno data centre inside the H2-Era Green Valley complex, powered by an 84 MW solar plant and selling waste heat to on-site farming. Co-location with generation and a heat offtaker is the model regulators elsewhere are now writing into connection terms rather than negotiating case by case.
Greg Abbott, Texas Governor
Greg Abbott, Texas Governor
Abbott directed PUCT and ERCOT on 3 August to audit every queued data centre's ownership, incentives and water use, saying projects that fail the state's survey should lose grid access. QTS's co-chief executives welcomed the review; Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller called it too vague and wants a special legislative session instead.
Government of Gujarat
Government of Gujarat
Gujarat notified a Data Centre Policy on 7 August offering capital, interest, tax and duty subsidies for projects sourcing at least 51% green power, targeting 7.5 GW against a 74 GW installed base. Where other jurisdictions priced or restricted grid access this month, Gujarat is paying developers to come instead.
Taiwan's Legislative Yuan Economics Committee
Taiwan's Legislative Yuan Economics Committee
The committee gave preliminary approval on 5 August to a self-generation mandate for large power users, including data centres, with fines up to NT$750,000. It agreed the obligation in principle while leaving the megawatt threshold that defines its reach to later implementing regulation.
Australian Energy Market Commission
Australian Energy Market Commission
AEMC advised ministers on 5 August that data centres should surrender renewable certificates against actual consumption, prove new demand with new firm capacity, and register as market participants. The advice would turn passive customers into obligated participants inside the market's dispatch and settlement machinery, ahead of an access-standards determination due in late October.