Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Cybersecurity: Threats and Defences
3AUG

The alert's citations predate the alert

2 min read
16:08UTC

Rockwell published advisory SD1790 on 30 July with no CVE attached, and the NCSC guidance CISA points water operators to is version 1.0 from March 2024. Only the alert itself is new.

TechnologyAssessed
Key takeaway

Check the publication date on every document an alert cites before treating the list as new action.

Rockwell Automation published security advisory SD1790 on 30 July, revising it the following day, covering MicroLogix 1100 and 1400 controllers rather than the 1400 alone that CISA's alert names⁠1. Rockwell attaches no CVE identifier to it, and states plainly that the document gives operational recovery steps for a controller an attacker has already locked rather than disclosing a vulnerability. Nothing in SD1790 is a patch. It tells an engineer how to get back into a device whose password has been changed underneath them.

The mitigation resource CISA points water operators towards comes from the NCSC, the UK's National Cyber Security Centre, and is titled Secure Connectivity Principles for Operational Technology. That document is version 1.0 and carries a publication date of March 2024⁠2. It was co-developed with international partner agencies at the time and has not been reissued for this activity.

The third citation cannot be examined at all. CISA names a separate FBI bulletin on the same controller targeting and does not reproduce it, so its contents are unavailable to anyone reading the alert. What the bulletin says, and whether it adds anything the alert does not, remains outside the public record.

A reader taking the citation list as evidence of a coordinated response mounted this week would be reading a 2024 guidance document, a vendor recovery note written this month, and an unpublished federal bulletin as a single act. Coordinated action on this beat looks different when it happens: NCSC's July naming of a Russian intelligence unit arrived with a long list of co-signing governments, technical detail and a publication date of its own. Nothing of that kind accompanies the water alert, whose only new document is the alert.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

When a government cybersecurity agency issues an alert, it often points to supporting documents from other agencies to show the advice is coordinated and well-established. Here, some of those citations don't hold up well under a closer look. CISA's water-sector alert points to guidance from the UK's NCSC, but that document is more than two years old, first published in March 2024, not new advice issued alongside this specific campaign. CISA also names an FBI bulletin on the same topic, but no one could find a copy of it. And the industrial equipment maker Rockwell Automation published its own guidance the same week, but it's explicitly a 'how to reset a locked controller' instruction sheet, not a software patch for a security flaw, because there isn't a flaw to patch, only a device left too exposed to the internet.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Rockwell's own advisory, SD1790, states explicitly that it is 'operational recovery guidance rather than a vulnerability disclosure,' meaning it tells operators how to factory-reset a password-locked MicroLogix controller, not how to patch a flaw. No CVE is attached because there isn't one: the attack exploits weak or exposed device access, not a coding defect Rockwell can fix in firmware.

That distinction matters structurally because CISA's own alert names Rockwell's MicroLogix 1400 specifically, but SD1790 as published also covers the MicroLogix 1100, a scope CISA's alert text doesn't mention. A reader following only CISA's wording would miss half the affected product line.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Readers who assume Rockwell's SD1790 is a patch may skip the actual fix, disconnecting or securing remote access, and wait instead for a firmware update that isn't coming.

  • Meaning

    An alert's citation list is not proof of fresh coordinated action; each cited document needs checking against its own publication date and scope.

First Reported In

Update #12 · KEV deadlines fell from 14 days to three

Rockwell Automation· 3 Aug 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Hospital Sírio-Libanês
Hospital Sírio-Libanês
Hospital Sírio-Libanês said a 21 September attack reached a reporting system for its social projects, possibly exposing patients' and staff identity numbers and health information, while its general patient database was untouched. It notified the ANPD and the Polícia Federal and warned of fraud attempts.
The Foschini Group
The Foschini Group
The Foschini Group told the Johannesburg exchange on 13 October that an attack found on 11 October disrupted IT systems at its TFG London brands, while stores stayed open. It has not identified the attackers or established whether personal data was taken.
FirstVDS
FirstVDS
FirstVDS said attackers used a VMmanager 6 flaw to copy customers' passwords, cloud credentials and cryptocurrency wallets from beneath their virtual servers, and told notified customers to assume theft and rotate credentials. ISPsystem's flaw was not fully fixed on 19 October.
ESET
ESET
ESET says Russia-aligned UAC-0099 phished a Ukrainian grain logistics firm in July 2025 and apparently passed its access to GRU-linked Sandworm, which wiped the company's data that September. It treats the attackers' use of the Yggdrasil network as a first for a state-aligned actor.
JPCERT/CC
JPCERT/CC
JPCERT/CC issued emergency alert AT-2026-0032 on 14 October as EG Secure Solutions confirmed attacks on the SiteGuard Server Edition flaw. It told operators to save diagnostic data before updating, because the update may erase traces of the attack.
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore said on 20 October that attackers are exploiting Ivanti Connect Secure, seven days after Ivanti's disclosure, having flagged PAN-OS exploitation on 16 October. It issued a PHP2Shell alert on 21 October, the day the fixes shipped.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.