Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Autonomous Systems: Land & Sea
13JUN

P&I clubs rebuy war-risk cover in three days

2 min read
11:07UTC

Twelve P&I clubs cancelled their regional war-risk extensions after reinsurers pulled their backing, then arranged replacement cover within three days, Lloyd's List reported on 18 August.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

War-risk cover returned within three days at a price set by a week of bad data.

Twelve leading P&I clubs (Protection and Indemnity mutuals, which carry a shipowner's third-party liabilities) cancelled their ancillary regional war-risk extensions after reinsurers, the insurers who take slices of rare catastrophic risk off other insurers, withdrew their backing. The clubs then arranged replacement buyback cover, war-risk insurance repurchased at current market prices, within three days. Lloyd's List reported the sequence in its daily briefing on 18 August⁠1.

The cancelled class covers specialist war-risk liabilities rather than core Protection and Indemnity, which remained available throughout. Any account of Gulf shipping as uninsured overstates it. The same briefing recorded three ADNOC vessels targeted in the preceding week.

One reading has an insurance market behaving exactly as designed: cover withdrawn the moment the reinsurance layer vanished, cover repurchased at a fresh price seventy-two hours later. The other reading follows a single owner through the week, from continuous cover, to a lapsed policy, to a repriced one. Nobody budgets for that middle stage, and neither reading can be settled from outside the market.

What can be examined is the material the underwriter had when setting the new price. Pricing a Hormuz voyage means pricing the chance of a hit against how many voyages actually take place, and that figure arrived in irreconcilable versions this week. It also means reading a sanctions register whose most recent Iran entry, a 35-party shadow-banking designation dated 14 August, reached the gazette as scanned images rather than machine-readable text. Frequency data and legal data both degraded together, and war-risk premiums travel down the chain into the delivered cost of crude, gas and containerised freight.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Twelve big insurance clubs that cover ships against war risks briefly cancelled some of their extra Gulf-related cover after the companies that back them, called reinsurers, pulled out. Within three days, the clubs found replacement cover and reinstated it. Ordinary insurance for cargo damage or crew injury kept working throughout; only the special war-risk add-on was affected. This matters because insurance is what lets a ship legally sail and get financed. A gap of even a few days can leave a shipowner unable to send a vessel through the strait, and this shows how quickly that cover can now come and go as the conflict continues.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

P&I clubs do not carry Gulf war-risk exposure on their own balance sheets; they buy reinsurance to back it, so a reinsurer pulling its backing forces a club to cancel cover it can no longer itself afford to underwrite, independent of any change in the underlying shipping risk.

The $40 billion US Development Finance Corporation Hormuz reinsurance facility, launched earlier in the conflict, has had zero uptake, meaning the private market has no functioning public backstop to fall back on when a reinsurer withdraws; clubs must find replacement private capacity or go without.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    A three-day cancel-and-rebuy cycle shows Gulf war-risk cover can now disappear and return faster than during earlier phases of the conflict, when whole P&I clubs stayed out for weeks.

First Reported In

Update #172 · The strait nobody can count, insure or pay

Lloyd's List· 19 Aug 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
P&I clubs rebuy war-risk cover in three days
Reinsurer withdrawal sits a layer above anything a shipowner can negotiate, so the new premium is not a matter of shopping around.
Different Perspectives
DNV and Fassmer
DNV and Fassmer
Signed a memorandum at SMM in Hamburg, announced on 10 September, to seek an approval in principle for autonomous naval vessels. DNV's Rasmus Stute said autonomy is "becoming one of the key pillars in defence".
Belgian Ministry of Defence
Belgian Ministry of Defence
Awarded Exail Robotics Belgium €9.87m on 14 September, without competition, for three TRIDENT systems carrying the K-STER C mine-disposal vehicle for Ukraine. It had tendered separately in July for twelve tethered ROVs, not yet bought.
IRGC Navy (Iran)
IRGC Navy (Iran)
IRGC spokesman Hossein Mohebbi said the IRGC Navy seized a US Kingfish mine-hunting vehicle in the Strait of Hormuz on 27 September, valuing it at several million dollars. US Central Command calls the claim "clearly desperate"; no verified imagery exists.
UK Defence Intelligence and Kraken
UK Defence Intelligence and Kraken
Defence Intelligence said the 12 September clash "almost certainly marks the first time" Russian and Ukrainian USVs engaged directly. Kraken meanwhile trialled an unarmed Saab radar picket boat on 5 and 6 October.
Ukrainian forces and ARX Robotics
Ukrainian forces and ARX Robotics
A Ukrainian Sargan-3000 destroyed a Russian robot boat on 12 September, and the first ARX GEREON ground robots reached Ukraine on 29 September. The Sargan-3000 carries a mounted gun.
Indian Register of Shipping
Indian Register of Shipping
Certified Accurate Industrial Controls' ISACA collision-avoidance software to IMO standards after five audited milestones and 2,500 hours of trials. The firm plans to use it converting six Indian Navy patrol boats.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.