Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Artemis II Moon Mission
11APR

Orion programme lead forecasts manageable char loss

1 min read
13:15UTC

Howard Hu, who led Orion through Artemis I's heat shield anomalies, said NASA expects char loss on tonight's lofted return but at levels below the 2022 damage.

ScienceDeveloping
Key takeaway

Some char loss expected and modelled; the magnitude versus Artemis I is tonight's key data point.

Howard Hu told reporters that NASA expects 'some char loss, not zero, but not to the magnitude of Artemis I.' His framing acknowledges what NASA has not previously stated explicitly: some char loss is expected. The lofted return eliminates the skip cycle that drove the most severe spalling on Artemis I, but the Avcoat material will still ablate. The crew cleared orthostatic testing and were declared ready for re-entry on Day 8 ; a separate gate from the heat shield question.

Post-recovery inspection will determine whether Hu's expectation was accurate. If char loss exceeds Artemis I levels, it directly contradicts the trajectory fix rationale and implies the underlying Avcoat manufacturing variability identified by the OIG context) is the dominant failure mode rather than the skip cycle.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The man who ran the Orion programme during the last flight's heat shield problems said some burning and charring is expected tonight; just less than before. That expectation will be tested when divers examine the capsule's base.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Post-recovery char assessment against Hu's benchmark will determine whether trajectory fix validation supports Artemis III's redesigned shield timeline.

First Reported In

Update #8 · Thirteen minutes on a shield NASA already replaced

NASA· 10 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Orion programme lead forecasts manageable char loss
Hu's statement is the programme's public expectation benchmark against which post-recovery inspection results will be measured.
Different Perspectives
JAXA
JAXA
JAXA is an Artemis Accords signatory with the Lunar Cruiser rover planned for south-pole surface operations; Chang'e 7's first-arrival timeline compresses the window those surface systems were designed to operate in alongside American crew.
Space Research Institute RAS / Roscosmos
Space Research Institute RAS / Roscosmos
The LILEM instrument on Chang'e 7 gives Russia science-cooperation presence at Shackleton's rim with no independent crewed lunar capability on a public timeline. This is Roscosmos's only confirmed path to south-pole science in the current decade.
CNSA / China Manned Space Agency
CNSA / China Manned Space Agency
Chang'e 7 at Wenchang confirmed a second-half 2026 launch for Shackleton rim, 18 to 24 months before any American crewed arrival. The mission carries a Russian LILEM instrument, giving Roscosmos a south-pole science foothold inside China's programme.
Jeremy Hansen / Canadian Space Agency
Jeremy Hansen / Canadian Space Agency
Hansen appeared at the 16 April JSC press conference in his only public moment since splashdown. Canada's Canadarm3 remains without a confirmed deployment host after Gateway cancellation, with CSA maintaining institutional silence on the programme's status.
Airbus Defence and Space
Airbus Defence and Space
Airbus has issued no post-mission ESM performance statement; its press room returned a 404 error on a 14 April check. The only named Airbus engineer quote on the mission appeared in a Nature interview, not a company release.
Daniel Neuenschwander / European Space Agency
Daniel Neuenschwander / European Space Agency
ESA's 11 April statement praised ESM translunar injection precision and omitted the pressurisation valve anomaly; the June 2026 Council is the sole stated review forum. ESM-3 is at KSC without a corrected-baseline disclosure to justify its readiness.