Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Artemis II Moon Mission
4APR

Third Burn Breaks Orion's Navigation Streak

2 min read
15:01UTC

One correction out of three planned is still exceptional for a first flight, but the 3.5-second overshoot ends the zero-correction narrative.

ScienceDeveloping
Key takeaway

One burn out of three planned is exceptional first-flight performance, but ends the zero-correction narrative.

NASA executed the third outbound trajectory correction burn at 11:03 PM EDT on 5 April, a 17.5-second firing of Orion's thrusters that ran 25% longer than the planned 14 seconds.1 The extra 3.5 seconds consumed propellant from a finite budget. Every second of unplanned thrust on a vehicle making its first crewed deep-space flight tightens the margin available for return-leg contingencies.

The burn ended a pattern that built across previous updates: two consecutive correction burns cancelled because the OMS-E translunar injection burn had been precise enough to hold course over four days of translunar coast , . Flight Director Rick Henfling framed it plainly: "We found that Orion was on such a pinpoint trajectory that we didn't need to do the first two correction manoeuvres."2 The two cancellations were the achievement; the third burn was routine housekeeping, a final alignment before the flyby.

One correction out of three planned, a 66% cancellation rate, remains exceptional for a first flight. The two cancellations banked propellant that Orion may yet need on the return leg. The 3.5-second overshoot on the third confirms the correction, while small, was not negligible, and breaks the zero-correction narrative that had been building since Day 3.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Before any mission to the Moon, engineers plan several small rocket firings along the way to correct the spacecraft's course, because no launch is perfect. Think of it like a golfer adjusting aim after each hole. Orion was aimed so well after its initial push toward the Moon that the first two planned corrections were unnecessary. The third was fired to make a small final alignment before the flyby, but it ran a bit longer than expected: 17.5 seconds instead of 14. That overshoot used a little extra fuel. Spacecraft have a fixed fuel supply, and every extra second of firing uses fuel that might be needed for something else later. The overshoot was small, but engineers will now monitor the remaining fuel budget carefully for the journey home.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The third burn's 3.5-second overshoot against a 14-second plan reflects thruster performance uncertainty inherent in first-flight calibration. The OMS-E engine's response characteristics at deep-space thermal conditions had not been measured on a prior crewed mission at this distance.

The two cancellations upstream of the third burn reflect the outstanding accuracy of the OMS-E translunar injection burn (ID:1915). The injection burn's precision reduced accumulated trajectory error below the threshold requiring correction, leaving only fine-alignment work for the third burn.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    The 3.5-second overshoot tightens Orion's propellant margin for return-leg contingency burns, requiring closer monitoring of fuel budget through splashdown.

  • Precedent

    First-flight thruster characterisation data from the overshoot will calibrate burn models for Artemis III and subsequent missions.

First Reported In

Update #5 · Records fall while Orion goes silent

NASA· 6 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
JAXA
JAXA
JAXA is an Artemis Accords signatory with the Lunar Cruiser rover planned for south-pole surface operations; Chang'e 7's first-arrival timeline compresses the window those surface systems were designed to operate in alongside American crew.
Space Research Institute RAS / Roscosmos
Space Research Institute RAS / Roscosmos
The LILEM instrument on Chang'e 7 gives Russia science-cooperation presence at Shackleton's rim with no independent crewed lunar capability on a public timeline. This is Roscosmos's only confirmed path to south-pole science in the current decade.
CNSA / China Manned Space Agency
CNSA / China Manned Space Agency
Chang'e 7 at Wenchang confirmed a second-half 2026 launch for Shackleton rim, 18 to 24 months before any American crewed arrival. The mission carries a Russian LILEM instrument, giving Roscosmos a south-pole science foothold inside China's programme.
Jeremy Hansen / Canadian Space Agency
Jeremy Hansen / Canadian Space Agency
Hansen appeared at the 16 April JSC press conference in his only public moment since splashdown. Canada's Canadarm3 remains without a confirmed deployment host after Gateway cancellation, with CSA maintaining institutional silence on the programme's status.
Airbus Defence and Space
Airbus Defence and Space
Airbus has issued no post-mission ESM performance statement; its press room returned a 404 error on a 14 April check. The only named Airbus engineer quote on the mission appeared in a Nature interview, not a company release.
Daniel Neuenschwander / European Space Agency
Daniel Neuenschwander / European Space Agency
ESA's 11 April statement praised ESM translunar injection precision and omitted the pressurisation valve anomaly; the June 2026 Council is the sole stated review forum. ESM-3 is at KSC without a corrected-baseline disclosure to justify its readiness.