Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
27JUL

DGA board backs AI deal, members vote

2 min read
10:02UTC

The Directors Guild board approved a four-year studio contract on 12 June; the members' ratification vote runs until 25 June, with AI footage rights at its centre.

← Back to SAP freezes R&D headcount as others deny AIJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

The Directors Guild board backed an AI deal with no training ban; members ratify by 25 June.

The Directors Guild of America board approved its four-year studio deal with the AMPTP on 12 June, the agreement reached on 9 June . The DGA represents film and television directors; the AMPTP is the trade body negotiating on behalf of the major studios. The members' ratification vote closes on 25 June, so the contract is approved by the leadership but not yet ratified by the membership.

The deal covers AI footage rights with no ban on training and no residuals when a director's work is used to train a model. That follows the template SAG-AFTRA accepted in its own AMPTP deal, which won digital-replica consent but no per-use royalty . Hollywood's unions are settling the terms on which studios may deploy AI faster than any statute, so the contract clauses agreed in Los Angeles this month will shape creative-sector AI practice well before the California bills moving through Sacramento become law.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Directors Guild of America; the union representing film and TV directors; reached a deal with the major Hollywood studios covering how AI can be used in their work. The deal was board-approved on 12 June and members voted to ratify it by 25 June. The deal covers AI-generated footage; meaning studios can use AI to create or alter video; but it does not ban AI training on directors' work and does not pay directors residuals if AI uses their footage. Directors' union negotiators accepted this position; other Hollywood unions (the writers and actors) won stronger protections in their own deals.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    The DGA deal's acceptance of AI footage rights without training ban or residuals sets a weaker template than the WGA and SAG-AFTRA precedents, potentially making it harder for other creative guilds to secure stronger terms in future rounds.

Sources:TrueUp / SkillSyncer
Mentions:Directors Guild of America →AMPTP →California →SAG-AFTRA →Sacramento →Los Angeles →Writers Guild of America →
First Reported In

Update #14 · The AI layoffs nobody is counting

TrueUp / SkillSyncer· 20 Jun 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
Directors settle Hollywood's AI fight weakest
The DGA board approval on 12 June advances the four-year AMPTP deal reached 9 June toward member ratification closing 25 June.
Occurred 9 Jun 2026
Read story →
This Event
DGA board backs AI deal, members vote
Hollywood is writing the private rulebook on AI-generated work that public legislation has not caught up to.
Different Perspectives
European Commission
European Commission
The European Commission's draft Annex III guidelines, closed for comment on 23 July, treat algorithmic scoring in recruitment, pay and termination as high-risk regardless of whether a human signs off, echoing Spain's Audiencia Nacional ruling 101/2026 on concealed scheduling algorithms. Brussels is shifting the fight from counting AI job losses to assigning legal liability for the tools themselves.
Office for National Statistics
Office for National Statistics
The Office for National Statistics recorded UK vacancies rising to 712,000 on 21 July, the first quarterly increase this beat has tracked, with payrolled employment down 85,000 on the year against May's 210,000 fall. The bulletin names no AI cause anywhere, and that is the point: nothing in the release confirms the displacement story it gets cited to support.
Christian Klein, SAP
Christian Klein, SAP
Christian Klein told investors on 23 July that SAP's research headcount will not grow for twelve months because AI agents and their token costs are absorbing the work, not because SAP is cutting jobs. He frames it as commercial arithmetic: the cost of AI-assisted coding tokens plus the salaries specialist AI hires command, not people being replaced by machines.
Betsey Stevenson, University of Michigan
Betsey Stevenson, University of Michigan
Betsey Stevenson argued that the 187,000 jobless-claims reading describes a market that hires little and fires little, not one AI is emptying. She said the real damage hides in eligibility rules and suppressed job postings, not in the headline layoff counts employers keep denying.
Comisiones Obreras, UGT and Concentrix's A Coruña works committee
Comisiones Obreras, UGT and Concentrix's A Coruña works committee
Comisiones Obreras, UGT and Concentrix's A Coruña works committee blamed Microsoft's push toward AI self-service for the 80 redundancies unions signed off on 22 July, not unavoidable business cause. A second Coruña procedure covering 80 more jobs runs to a 31 August deadline, and the unions want the state, not the employer, setting the pace of AI-driven cuts.
Stanford's 'We Must Act Now' signatories
Stanford's 'We Must Act Now' signatories
More than 200 academics, including 16 Nobel laureates, published a 13 July letter warning of AI-driven labour disruption, citing Daron Acemoglu's NBER estimate that AI's total factor productivity gain stays under 0.66% over ten years. The letter's own cited economics sit well below Goldman Sachs Research's 1.5-percentage-point estimate published the same week.