Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
17JUL

AI super PACs spend $150m on primaries

3 min read
14:01UTC

The $100m Leading the Future PAC, backed by OpenAI's Greg Brockman and Andreessen Horowitz, spent against regulation-minded candidates in the 2 June primaries; a $50m counter-PAC has formed.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

AI-industry and pro-regulation PACs are spending $150m to shape who wins the primaries.

The $100 million Leading the Future super PAC, backed by Greg Brockman of OpenAI, the venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and Joe Lonsdale, contested the primaries held on Tuesday 2 June 2026, spending against regulation-minded candidates in California and Montana races 1. The committee has committed over $100 million to the 2026 midterms and is lined up for the 27 June Louisiana runoff. A $50 million counter-PAC, Public First, has formed to back pro-regulation candidates, bringing combined spending on the question to $150 million.

Primaries are cheaper to influence than general elections and draw far lower turnout, so a relatively small sum can pick favourable nominees before the wider electorate engages. Leading the Future is run in part by a former crypto super-PAC operative reusing the 2024 playbook that flooded primaries early to lock in friendly candidates. The same fight that has stalled in Congress is being settled at the nomination stage instead.

The spending tracks the policy. As state bills such as California's SB 951 advance the case for AI-displacement rules , the industry is contesting the legislators who would write and vote on them. The $150 million committed on both sides signals that the participants expect AI labour policy to be decided in statehouses and primary ballots rather than on the Senate floor, and they are funding the contest accordingly.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A super PAC is a political fund that can raise and spend unlimited money to influence elections, as long as it does not directly coordinate with a candidate. Two super PACs are now competing in the 2026 US midterm elections over AI regulation. Leading the Future, backed by OpenAI's co-founder Greg Brockman and the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, has committed over $100 million to defeat candidates who favour regulating AI. In the 2 June primaries it targeted candidates in California and Montana who had backed AI worker-protection bills. A rival group called Public First has formed with $50 million to back the candidates Leading the Future is trying to unseat. The combined $150 million makes the 2026 midterms the most heavily funded AI-regulation election fight in US history. The result will shape whether state-level bills like California's SB 951 can advance through legislatures elected partly on AI-industry money.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If Leading the Future defeats even a third of its 2026 primary targets, the legislative path for federal AI workforce measurement funding and state-level displacement notice bills narrows significantly through 2027.

First Reported In

Update #12 · Jobs report says fine, layoff report says no

FierceBiotech· 8 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Stanford's 'We Must Act Now' signatories
Stanford's 'We Must Act Now' signatories
More than 200 academics, including 16 Nobel laureates, published a 13 July letter warning of AI-driven labour disruption, citing Daron Acemoglu's NBER estimate that AI's total factor productivity gain stays under 0.66% over ten years. The letter's own cited economics sit well below Goldman Sachs Research's 1.5-percentage-point estimate published the same week.
Germany / the Bundesrat
Germany / the Bundesrat
Germany's Bundesrat acted on the EU AI Act's employment provisions on 10 July, more than a year ahead of the Act's 2 December 2027 enforcement deadline. Germany is moving on statutory AI-employment disclosure while the US Congress and Federal Reserve have no equivalent instrument.
Indian IT services sector (TCS, HCLTech, Wipro)
Indian IT services sector (TCS, HCLTech, Wipro)
TCS cut 19,271 roles and HCLTech cut 3,292 in the same reporting week that Wipro's headcount rose by 888 under its own zero-fresher-hiring pledge for FY27. The divergence shows attrition, not layoffs, is how India's outsourcers absorb AI-driven project compression while their net headcount numbers stay ambiguous.
Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve
Barr said on 14 July there is little evidence of AI displacement, citing a 43-versus-10 adoption gap by education; Cook said the next day the dire predictions have not come to fruition, her text carrying none of the bond-spread language she used in May. The Fed reads AI's labour effect through national aggregates, where four banks' cuts remain statistically invisible.
Barclays
Barclays
Barclays economist Pooja Sriram flagged a 28,000-a-month bleed in finance and information roles the same week Microsoft disputed that AI drove its own 4,800 cuts. The bank treats Challenger's AI-attribution share as a lagging indicator against faster erosion visible in raw labour-market data.
European Commission
European Commission
Brussels deferred the Digital Omnibus's Annex III employment-compliance deadline from 2 August 2026 to December 2027, even as California advanced three binding AI-hiring bills the same week. The 17-month delay leaves EU workers without the algorithmic-hiring safeguards the regulation already promises.