Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Thomas H. Davenport
PersonUS

Thomas H. Davenport

Babson College and MIT research fellow; co-authored the HBR finding that only 2% of AI-citing layoffs followed actual deployment.

Last refreshed: 8 June 2026

Key Question

If 98% of AI layoffs happen before any AI is deployed, what does that say about corporate honesty?

Timeline for Thomas H. Davenport

View full timeline →
Common Questions
Who is Thomas Davenport and what did he find about AI layoffs?
Thomas Davenport is a Distinguished Professor at Babson College and MIT research fellow. He co-authored HBR research with Laks Srinivasan finding only about 2% of organisations that cited AI in layoffs had actually deployed the AI. The rest were cutting in anticipation.Source: Harvard Business Review
What is Thomas Davenport's research on AI and job displacement?
Davenport and Laks Srinivasan found that roughly 98% of AI-attributed layoffs preceded actual AI deployment, suggesting most companies use AI as a rationale for cuts they had already planned for other reasons.Source: Harvard Business Review
What books has Thomas Davenport written about AI in business?
Davenport has written more than twenty books including The AI Advantage, Competing on Analytics, and Only Humans Need Apply. He is one of the most widely cited scholars on how organisations adopt AI in practice.

Background

Thomas H. Davenport is a Distinguished Professor at Babson College and a research fellow at MIT's Initiative on the Digital Economy, where he studies the application of analytics, data Science, and artificial intelligence in business. He is among the most widely cited scholars on AI adoption in enterprise settings, having written or co-authored more than twenty books on the subject including The AI Advantage and Competing on Analytics.

Davenport came to prominence in the current AI-jobs debate as co-author, with Laks Srinivasan, of research published in the Harvard Business Review finding that only approximately 2% of organisations that cited AI in layoff announcements had actually deployed the AI in question. The remainder were cutting in anticipation of capability not yet in use. The finding was reinforced in June 2026 when MIT Sloan professor Paul Osterman independently described AI attribution in layoff announcements as largely a cover story, arguing technology has been used as an executive alibi for two decades.

Davenport's work sits at the methodologically sceptical end of the AI-displacement debate. Where Challenger, Gray & Christmas tracks stated attribution and Stanford models suppressed hires, Davenport's research interrogates the gap between what companies say they are doing with AI and what they have actually implemented. His conclusion that AI-washing is pervasive in layoff communications has been widely cited by labour economists, journalists, and policymakers examining the 2025-2026 restructuring cycle.

Source Material