Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Opinion 06/2026
Concept

Opinion 06/2026

ACER opinion recommending Hungary's exemption from EU gas capacity-bundling rules at Serbia border.

Last refreshed: 18 May 2026

Key Question

Will the Commission accept ACER's advice and grant Hungary's gas market exemption by 5 August?

Timeline for Opinion 06/2026

#1013 May
View full timeline →
Common Questions
What does ACER Opinion 06/2026 recommend?
ACER Opinion 06/2026 recommends that the European Commission grant Hungary a derogation from Article 19 of the CAM Network Code at the Kiskundorozsma-1 Hungary-Serbia gas interconnection point. The Commission must decide by 5 August 2026.Source: ACER Opinion 06/2026
What happens if the European Commission does not respond to ACER Opinion 06/2026 by 5 August 2026?
Under EU Gas Regulation 2024/1789, if the Commission issues no decision before the 5 August 2026 deadline, Hungary's derogation request is deemed refused by operation of law.Source: EU Gas Regulation 2024/1789 Article 70
What is the CAM Network Code and why does it apply to Hungary?
The CAM (Capacity Allocation Mechanism) Network Code is EU legislation requiring gas transmission operators at cross-border interconnection points to offer bundled capacity products. It applies to Hungary as an EU member state; Hungary is seeking an exemption at its Serbia border point because Serbia is not an EU member and cannot fully comply with CAM rules on its side.Source: ACER Opinion 06/2026

Background

ACER Opinion 06/2026 was published on 6 May 2026 and recommends that the European Commission grant a derogation to Hungary from Article 19 of the CAM (Capacity Allocation Mechanism) Network Code at the Kiskundorozsma-1 Hungary-Serbia gas interconnection point. The derogation was requested by Hungary's energy regulator MEKH on 5 February 2026 under Article 70 of EU Gas Regulation 2024/1789. The European Commission has until 5 August 2026 to issue its decision .

Article 19 of the CAM Network Code requires transmission system operators at cross-border interconnection points to offer capacity products bundled across both sides of the border, reducing transaction friction for shippers. The rationale for derogation at Kiskundorozsma-1 is that Serbia is an EU accession candidate rather than a full EU member, meaning the Serbian side of the interconnection does not operate under the same regulatory framework as EU TSOs — making strict CAM bundling compliance operationally impractical without a Serbian regulatory counterpart to coordinate with. Opinion 06/2026 was published alongside six other NRA derogation opinions on the same date, reflecting a wave of Article 70 submissions following the entry into force of Regulation 2024/1789.

The opinion is advisory: ACER has no power to grant or refuse derogations — that decision sits with the European Commission. The Commission is not bound by ACER's recommendation but has historically followed it in the majority of NRA derogation cases. The 5 August 2026 deadline creates a defined decision window . If no Commission decision issues before that date, the derogation request is deemed refused by operation of law under Regulation 2024/1789. The outcome will set a precedent for similar requests at other EU-non-EU interconnection points processing post-2024 derogation applications.

Source Material