
Opinion 06/2026
ACER opinion recommending Hungary's exemption from EU gas capacity-bundling rules at Serbia border.
Last refreshed: 18 May 2026
Will the Commission accept ACER's advice and grant Hungary's gas market exemption by 5 August?
Timeline for Opinion 06/2026
GB exports gas; Hungary clears EUR 123
European Energy Markets- What does ACER Opinion 06/2026 recommend?
- ACER Opinion 06/2026 recommends that the European Commission grant Hungary a derogation from Article 19 of the CAM Network Code at the Kiskundorozsma-1 Hungary-Serbia gas interconnection point. The Commission must decide by 5 August 2026.Source: ACER Opinion 06/2026
- What happens if the European Commission does not respond to ACER Opinion 06/2026 by 5 August 2026?
- Under EU Gas Regulation 2024/1789, if the Commission issues no decision before the 5 August 2026 deadline, Hungary's derogation request is deemed refused by operation of law.Source: EU Gas Regulation 2024/1789 Article 70
- What is the CAM Network Code and why does it apply to Hungary?
- The CAM (Capacity Allocation Mechanism) Network Code is EU legislation requiring gas transmission operators at cross-border interconnection points to offer bundled capacity products. It applies to Hungary as an EU member state; Hungary is seeking an exemption at its Serbia border point because Serbia is not an EU member and cannot fully comply with CAM rules on its side.Source: ACER Opinion 06/2026
Background
ACER Opinion 06/2026 was published on 6 May 2026 and recommends that the European Commission grant a derogation to Hungary from Article 19 of the CAM (Capacity Allocation Mechanism) Network Code at the Kiskundorozsma-1 Hungary-Serbia gas interconnection point. The derogation was requested by Hungary's energy regulator MEKH on 5 February 2026 under Article 70 of EU Gas Regulation 2024/1789. The European Commission has until 5 August 2026 to issue its decision .
Article 19 of the CAM Network Code requires transmission system operators at cross-border interconnection points to offer capacity products bundled across both sides of the border, reducing transaction friction for shippers. The rationale for derogation at Kiskundorozsma-1 is that Serbia is an EU accession candidate rather than a full EU member, meaning the Serbian side of the interconnection does not operate under the same regulatory framework as EU TSOs — making strict CAM bundling compliance operationally impractical without a Serbian regulatory counterpart to coordinate with. Opinion 06/2026 was published alongside six other NRA derogation opinions on the same date, reflecting a wave of Article 70 submissions following the entry into force of Regulation 2024/1789.
The opinion is advisory: ACER has no power to grant or refuse derogations — that decision sits with the European Commission. The Commission is not bound by ACER's recommendation but has historically followed it in the majority of NRA derogation cases. The 5 August 2026 deadline creates a defined decision window . If no Commission decision issues before that date, the derogation request is deemed refused by operation of law under Regulation 2024/1789. The outcome will set a precedent for similar requests at other EU-non-EU interconnection points processing post-2024 derogation applications.