Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
OCDH
OrganisationES

OCDH

Spanish-based Cuban human rights observatory documenting repression since 2013

Last refreshed: 7 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

How does OCDH know the Cuba amnesty excluded political prisoners?

Timeline for OCDH

#413 May

Co-delivered the Acuerdo de Liberación to Ollongren in Brussels

Cuba Dispatch: Cuban coalition hands Acuerdo to EU in Brussels
#330 Apr

Published April report documenting 366 repressive actions and active prison deterioration

Cuba Dispatch: OCDH logs 366 April actions; PD count hits 1,250
#216 Apr
View full timeline →
Common Questions
Did Cuba release any political prisoners in the 2026 amnesty?
No, according to OCDH's March 2026 report. The observatory found no political prisoner was included in the announced releases, despite the government claiming 2,000+ freed.Source: OCDH March 2026 report
What is the OCDH and is it reliable?
The Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos is a Spain-based NGO founded in 2013 that monitors Cuban human rights; its methodology is cited by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.Source: OCDH institutional record
What is the OCDH and who runs it?
The OCDH (Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos) is a Cuba human rights monitoring organisation founded in 2013 and based in Madrid, Spain. It uses a network of on-island sources to document detentions, harassment, and prison conditions, publishing monthly statistical reports cited by the IACHR and Western governments.Source: entity background
How many political prisoners does Cuba have according to OCDH?
OCDH's partner organisation Prisoners Defenders counted 1,250 political prisoners at end-March 2026, the highest in its history. OCDH's own April 2026 report logged 366 repressive actions and confirmed that neither the March nor April amnesty waves included any political prisoners.Source: event 3084
Did Cuba's 2026 amnesty release political prisoners?
No. OCDH, Prisoners Defenders, and Amnesty International all verified that neither the 51-prisoner March announcement nor the 2,010-prisoner April announcement included any individuals jailed for political offences. Cuba's pardon decree explicitly excludes crimes against authority (Articles 142-149 of the Penal Code), the provisions used to prosecute dissidents.Source: event 3084
Why does OCDH operate from Spain rather than Cuba?
OCDH operates from Madrid because independent civil society organisations cannot legally operate inside Cuba. The Cuban government restricts independent monitoring, so OCDH coordinates its documentation remotely through a network of on-island contacts and publishes from Spain, where it is beyond Cuban jurisdiction.Source: entity background
How do the US and EU use OCDH data?
Western governments rely on OCDH reports to independently verify Cuban government amnesty claims and assess whether prisoner releases meet thresholds for sanctions adjustments. The EU references OCDH data in human rights dialogues tied to the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement with Cuba.Source: entity background

Background

The OCDH (Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos) has become the primary independent statistical record of repression in Cuba during 2026. Its April report logged 366 repressive actions — up from 277 in March — describing active deterioration of political prisoners' conditions during the period the Cuban government was publicly framing as 'indulgence.' The organisation stated categorically in both reports that no political prisoner was included in the amnesty announcements.

Founded in 2013 and based in Madrid, OCDH systematically documents human rights violations in Cuba using a network of on-island sources. It publishes regular statistical reports on detentions, harassment, arbitrary arrests, and prison conditions. Its methodology has been cited by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and by Western governments seeking independent verification of Cuban government claims.

OCDH's reporting fills a structural gap that gives it outsized diplomatic weight: independent verification that amnesties exclude political cases is essential for any US or EU assessment of whether prisoner releases constitute genuine progress. Alongside Prisoners Defenders and Amnesty International, OCDH data forms the three-monitor consensus that directly informs OFAC decision-making and EU conditions attached to the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement with Cuba. Its findings would be as relevant if Cuba's political-prisoner arc surfaced in any broader Latin America or UN Human Rights Council context.