Skip to content
US Midterms 2026
16APR

Fellowship PAC Shows Zero in Federal Filings

2 min read
09:34UTC

Fellowship PAC still shows zero dollars in FEC filings despite claiming $100 million raised. The Q1 2026 disclosure is due 15 April, three days from today.

← Back to Tariff shock reads in GDP. Senate map moves.Jump to analysis ↓
PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

The 15 April FEC filing will reveal whether Fellowship PAC's $100 million claim has any basis in federal records.

Fellowship PAC still shows $0 in FEC filings despite publicly claiming $100 million raised . The Q1 2026 quarterly report is due 15 April, three days from today. If that filing shows zero again, the claim remains entirely unsupported by federal records 1.

The PAC is chaired by Jesse Spiro, a Tether US executive. Its registered finance director, Mitchell Nobel, works for Cantor Fitzgerald, which custodies Tether's reserves. The personnel connections to the stablecoin industry are direct.

Three explanations persist. The money does not exist, and the public claims function as influence projection without actual spending. The money exists but is structured below reporting thresholds or routed through intermediaries with their own delayed disclosure cycles. Or contributions were received after the previous filing period and will appear in the Q1 report. The 15 April filing will narrow these possibilities. Any reported contributions would reveal donor identity for the first time; continued silence would make the $100 million claim increasingly difficult to take at face value.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Fellowship PAC is a political action committee connected to the cryptocurrency industry, led by Jesse Spiro (an executive at Tether, a major crypto company) and Mitchell Nobel (an executive at Cantor Fitzgerald, a major Wall Street firm). It has publicly claimed to have raised $100 million to spend on the 2026 elections. The problem: federal election records show the PAC has received exactly $0 in contributions. This is not a small discrepancy , the entire publicly claimed amount is absent from official records. Political action committees are legally required to report contributions above $200 to the Federal Election Commission. If Fellowship PAC had actually received $100 million, those contributions would appear in public records. The Q1 2026 filing due in mid-April is the next opportunity for any contributions to appear. If it shows $0 again, the $100 million claim has no federal evidence to support it.

Sources:Federal Election Commission
Mentions:Mitchell Nobel →Cantor Fitzgerald →Tether →FEC →Fellowship PAC →Jesse Spiro →
First Reported In

Update #2 · First votes exceed every forecast

Federal Election Commission· 12 Apr 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Fellowship PAC Shows Zero in Federal Filings
A second consecutive $0 quarterly filing would confirm that the PAC's $100 million claim is either political theatre or structured through intermediaries designed to avoid disclosure.
Led to
Fellowship PAC: $11m filed, $89m missing
Fellowship PAC's prior $0 filings (ID:2280) set the expectation that the 15 April Q1 filing would resolve the $100M claim, and the $11M disclosure directly updates that finding.
Occurred 15 Apr 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Trump administration
Trump administration
The administration has pressed a 48-state voter data collection campaign through affirmative DOJ litigation even as seven executive order provisions were blocked by three courts, treating the parallel legal tracks as independent infrastructure projects. The resignation of its own privacy officer and the SAVE system's 17% error rate have not altered the operational posture.
V-Dem Institute (Sweden)
V-Dem Institute (Sweden)
V-Dem's annual democracy index tracks the combination of 31 restrictive voting laws enacted in 2025, DOGE's collaboration with the election-denial organisation True the Vote, and the 17% SAVE system error rate as compounding indicators of backsliding on electoral procedural integrity, distinct from the formal electoral outcomes of the 7 April votes.
European Union trade analysts
European Union trade analysts
The 7-point lower-income Democratic shift and the 75% American tariff-disapproval reading are being watched closely in Brussels: a Democratic House after November 2026 would shift trade committee power and create pressure to negotiate tariff relief, a structural change with direct consequences for European exporters absorbing US import costs since 2025.
Canadian federal government
Canadian federal government
Ottawa is watching the Cook Senate shifts as a medium-term signal: four Democratic pickups would change the legislative arithmetic on tariff authority, and a formal US recession confirmed by a second negative GDP quarter would alter conditions for any USMCA renegotiation.
Mexican government trade officials
Mexican government trade officials
Mexico is the United States' largest trading partner and faces direct exposure to the tariff regime driving Democratic gains; the 7-point lower-income voter shift in the US and a Democratic House after November 2026 would create political pressure for renegotiation of tariff structures that are currently compressing cross-border manufacturing margins.
Trump administration and Republican Senate majority
Trump administration and Republican Senate majority
Attorney General Pam Bondi framed the 30-state voter-data suits as routine compliance enforcement. Republican Senate leaders are using the SAVE Act floor votes to force Democrats in competitive states onto the record on culture-war amendments that will later run in campaign advertisements, compensating for the bill's lack of a cloture path.