Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
UK Startups and Innovation
22APR

FCA and PRA cut SM&CR certification by 15%

3 min read
17:16UTC

Phase one of a 50% reduction target. The single biggest regulatory overhead on small authorised fintechs has finally started to shrink.

← Back to Britain's innovation pipe leaks at both endsJump to analysis ↓
TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

UK fintech's single biggest compliance overhead is shrinking for the first time since 2019.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) cut certification roles under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) by 15% on 22 April 2026, phase one of a 50% reduction target. The two regulators also confirmed that the Certification Regime will be removed from primary legislation over time, a structural change rather than a temporary loosening.

SM&CR requires authorised financial firms to individually certify fitness and propriety for every senior and customer-facing employee, each year, with personal regulatory accountability attached to the sign-off. Since its 2019 expansion to all authorised firms, it has been the single largest compliance overhead for small fintechs; a twenty-person payments startup runs the same certification cycle as a 200-person bank. Removing 15% of roles from scope is the first material reduction in that overhead in six years. Phase two takes the cut to 50%.

The FCA and PRA timed the cut to land in the same week as the AI Live Testing second-cohort expansion and alongside the British Business Bank direct-investment mandate . The combined signal to UK fintech is coherent: lower authorised-firm overhead, wider permitted AI experimentation scope, continuing authorisation pipeline capacity. Founders running authorised fintechs at sub-50-headcount will see the concrete effect at the next compliance cycle renewal.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) is a set of rules that requires financial services companies to personally certify that their key staff are fit and proper for their roles, and to hold specific senior managers personally accountable for regulatory failures. It was created after the 2008 financial crisis to ensure that individual bankers could be held responsible rather than just the banks themselves. For small fintech startups, it became a significant administrative burden. The 15% reduction announced this week means fewer roles need to be formally certified, which reduces some paperwork and legal costs for smaller authorised firms.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The SM&CR 2019 extension to solo-regulated firms created certification obligations for roles; including some client-service and operations roles at small fintechs; that had no equivalent in the banking sector regime the scheme originally targeted; removing those roles in phase one is a correction of an over-extension rather than a deregulatory choice.

The FCA's Growth and Competitiveness objective, added to its statutory mandate by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023, creates an explicit duty to consider the competitive impact of regulation; the SM&CR reform is the first material action taken under that duty in fintech, and the scale of the first phase (15% of roles) reflects caution about moving ahead of a 2026-27 Parliamentary review of the Financial Services and Markets Act.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    The 50% total certification-role reduction target requires a further 35-percentage-point cut beyond today's phase one; HMRC's autumn 2026 consultation on the Certification Regime's removal from primary legislation is the mechanism for that reduction, and the outcome of that consultation will determine whether the 50% target is reached before the next election.

  • Opportunity

    Fintech firms that currently maintain inflated certification-role counts to protect against regulatory interpretation risk; a common practice identified in Linklaters' survey; will use the phase-one reforms as an opportunity to normalise their compliance structures, producing a one-off audit and legal spend in 2026 followed by structural cost savings from 2027.

Sources:CNBC
Mentions:Financial Conduct Authority →Prudential Regulation Authority →Senior Managers and Certification Regime →HM Treasury →British Business Bank →AI Live Testing →
First Reported In

Update #2 · Britain's innovation pipe leaks at both ends

CNBC· 22 Apr 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
FCA and PRA cut SM&CR certification by 15%
The SM&CR 15% cut is the first material reduction in fintech compliance overhead since the regime was expanded in 2019, paired with a sandbox demand surge that suggests a deliberate regulatory-posture shift.
Led to
FCA puts Revolut in stablecoin sandbox
The FCA's stablecoin sandbox is consistent with its drive to cut regulatory overhead, having reduced SM&CR certification roles by 15% in spring 2026.
Occurred 8 Jun 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Institute of Physics
Institute of Physics
The Institute has long argued STFC's national-laboratory infrastructure, not its grant programmes, is the binding constraint on UK physics output, and warns mothballing capacity like Clara removes capability that cannot be rebuilt on a four-year cycle. It represents the discovery-science community absorbing the reallocation the Bank's equity cheques do not touch.
Helsing
Helsing
The Munich-headquartered defence-AI firm chose Plymouth over Continental sites for a £350m manufacturing plant building underwater surveillance gliders, alongside its record raise. Its choice of postcode signals confidence in UK manufacturing capacity for defence hardware even as it looks abroad for the capital financing that hardware.
Dragoneer Investment Group, Lightspeed Venture Partners and Iconiq
Dragoneer Investment Group, Lightspeed Venture Partners and Iconiq
The three US growth-capital firms backed Helsing's $1.8bn round at an $18bn valuation, more than doubling the mark set only a year earlier, with demand reportedly exceeding the capital on offer. Their money, not a UK sovereign vehicle, is what funds the Plymouth plant, extending a pattern of foreign capital underwriting British defence-hardware manufacturing this cycle.
British Business Bank
British Business Bank
The Bank wrote its largest-ever direct life-sciences cheque into Alchemab and added a £6.5bn SME lending guarantee the same week UKRI confirmed the STFC cuts. It is deploying an April mandate change letting it lead venture rounds and invest directly up to £60m per company, treating equity extension rounds and small-business debt as newly within its risk appetite.
Daphni
Daphni
The Paris seed fund joined Speedinvest and three UK backers in Astral Systems' GBP23m Series A for modular fusion reactors, one of the round's five European co-investors betting on lab-to-market fusion ahead of any working commercial reactor. Unlike CuspAI's all-foreign cap table, this round kept a UK lead investor in Mercia Ventures.
EQT
EQT
EQT, appointed by the European Innovation Council to run the EUR5bn Scaleup Europe Fund, entered advanced talks for a further CuspAI stake reported on 3 July, the fund's first pursuit of a UK-founded winner. A closed deal would put EU sovereign capital, not a UK vehicle, on the cap table of a company Britain's own funds passed over.