Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
UK Startups and Innovation
13APR

Innovate UK adopts DARPA-style portfolio model

3 min read
17:59UTC

Open-competition grants give way to a portfolio management approach. The Velocity programme will scout and back deep-tech companies across six sectors. The ambition is DARPA; the budget is a third of it.

← Back to State capital floods in, seed money drainsJump to analysis ↓
TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Innovate UK wants DARPA's model on a budget roughly one-third of DARPA's size.

Innovate UK published a new prospectus in April 2026 replacing open-competition grant programmes with a portfolio management model 1. The Velocity programme offers ongoing relationship-based account management instead of fixed-term grants. Growth Sector Teams will actively scout and back high-potential deep-tech businesses across six priority areas: advanced manufacturing, clean energy, creative industries, defence, life sciences, and digital technology.

A new High Potential Business Framework evaluates companies on four criteria: team capability, technical breakthrough, talent pipeline, and market readiness. The model is explicitly DARPA-like: proactive identification and sustained backing rather than reactive competitions.

The budget does not match the ambition. DARPA's 2025 budget was approximately $3.7bn (roughly £2.9bn). Innovate UK's total annual budget is approximately £1bn, of which innovation grant programmes are a fraction. DARPA's power comes from absolute scale: it can back 50 speculative projects knowing most will fail. Innovate UK's increased selectivity without a proportional budget rise means the same money reaches fewer companies. Active competitions in April 2026 include Battery Innovation (£25m), Robotics and Autonomous Systems (£38m, DSIT-backed), and Frontier AI Discovery (£2.5m). Companies excluded from the Velocity portfolio have fewer fallback options than under the old regime.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Innovate UK is the government's main funding agency for technology companies. Until now, it ran open competitions: any eligible company could apply, the best proposals won grants. From 2026, it is changing to a different approach, more like a venture capital fund: it will proactively seek out the companies it thinks are most promising and offer them sustained support, rather than waiting for applications. The model is inspired by DARPA, the US defence research agency that funded early-stage versions of the internet, GPS, and stealth technology. The ambition is to be more strategic. The concern is that DARPA has a budget of £2.9bn per year; Innovate UK has about £1bn for everything, with grants only a portion of that.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Innovate UK model shift reflects accumulated evidence that open competition grants systematically favour companies with the capacity to write high-quality grant applications rather than companies with the highest technical potential.

Large companies and universities with dedicated grants teams consistently outperform smaller startups in competitive grant processes, even when the smaller startups have superior technology. The portfolio model is partly intended to correct for application-quality bias.

A secondary cause is UKRI's organisational structure. Innovate UK sits within UKRI alongside seven research councils. Competition for UKRI's central budget means Innovate UK's operational model must be justifiable to a UKRI board primarily oriented toward academic research output metrics rather than commercial technology deployment.

The shift to a portfolio model with portfolio membership and relationship management creates a differentiated accountability framework that may be more defensible within UKRI's governance.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Companies outside Innovate UK's portfolio network lose access to their primary public funding channel as open competitions shrink, concentrating public support in a smaller number of pre-selected companies.

  • Consequence

    ARIA and Innovate UK Velocity now overlap in remit; without clarification from DSIT, companies may face competing application processes for similar mandates.

Sources:Innovate UK / UKRI
Mentions:Innovate UK →UKRI →Innovate UK Velocity programme →Prima →Japan →DSIT →
First Reported In

Update #1 · State capital floods in, seed money drains

Innovate UK / UKRI· 13 Apr 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Institute of Physics
Institute of Physics
The Institute has long argued STFC's national-laboratory infrastructure, not its grant programmes, is the binding constraint on UK physics output, and warns mothballing capacity like Clara removes capability that cannot be rebuilt on a four-year cycle. It represents the discovery-science community absorbing the reallocation the Bank's equity cheques do not touch.
Helsing
Helsing
The Munich-headquartered defence-AI firm chose Plymouth over Continental sites for a £350m manufacturing plant building underwater surveillance gliders, alongside its record raise. Its choice of postcode signals confidence in UK manufacturing capacity for defence hardware even as it looks abroad for the capital financing that hardware.
Dragoneer Investment Group, Lightspeed Venture Partners and Iconiq
Dragoneer Investment Group, Lightspeed Venture Partners and Iconiq
The three US growth-capital firms backed Helsing's $1.8bn round at an $18bn valuation, more than doubling the mark set only a year earlier, with demand reportedly exceeding the capital on offer. Their money, not a UK sovereign vehicle, is what funds the Plymouth plant, extending a pattern of foreign capital underwriting British defence-hardware manufacturing this cycle.
British Business Bank
British Business Bank
The Bank wrote its largest-ever direct life-sciences cheque into Alchemab and added a £6.5bn SME lending guarantee the same week UKRI confirmed the STFC cuts. It is deploying an April mandate change letting it lead venture rounds and invest directly up to £60m per company, treating equity extension rounds and small-business debt as newly within its risk appetite.
Daphni
Daphni
The Paris seed fund joined Speedinvest and three UK backers in Astral Systems' GBP23m Series A for modular fusion reactors, one of the round's five European co-investors betting on lab-to-market fusion ahead of any working commercial reactor. Unlike CuspAI's all-foreign cap table, this round kept a UK lead investor in Mercia Ventures.
EQT
EQT
EQT, appointed by the European Innovation Council to run the EUR5bn Scaleup Europe Fund, entered advanced talks for a further CuspAI stake reported on 3 July, the fund's first pursuit of a UK-founded winner. A closed deal would put EU sovereign capital, not a UK vehicle, on the cap table of a company Britain's own funds passed over.