Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
UK Local Elections 2026
13APR

Candidate Database Jumps From 2.6% to 86% in Three Days

2 min read
16:52UTC

Democracy Club's candidate database went from covering 81 of 3,074 areas to 2,636 in the three days following English and Welsh Statement of Persons Nominated publication. Scotland hit 100 per cent. Volunteer verification of imported records continues; the North East lags at 39 per cent entered.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

SoPN publication closed the candidate data gap, making England and Wales candidate-level analysis viable for the first time.

Democracy Club's candidate database stood at 2.6 per cent coverage, 81 of 3,074 areas, on 7 April 2026 . By 10 April, following English and Welsh Statement of Persons Nominated publication on 9 and 10 April, the database covered 86 per cent: 2,636 areas. Scotland reached 100 per cent before the English and Welsh SoPNs published. The three-day movement represents the largest single data discontinuity in this briefing cycle.

SoPN publication is the mechanism by which returning officers publish the final candidate list for each seat; until it publishes, no authoritative count exists. SoPN publication is the mechanism by which returning officers publish the final list of standing candidates for each seat; until it publishes, no authoritative count of candidates exists. Democracy Club's volunteer network ingests the published documents, enters the data, and double-checks it. As of 10 April, 2,068 areas have candidate data entered and 1,457 are double-checked. The 611 entered-but-not-checked gap represents records awaiting verification, not missing data.

North East England at 39 per cent entered is the most significant regional lag. North East England's 39 per cent entry rate follows a volunteer density pattern: Democracy Club is volunteer-driven, and data entry speed tracks the geographic distribution of its network. The North East has historically had lower volunteer coverage than London and the South East. For any analysis that depends on complete candidate-level data in the North East, the verification lag matters.

The practical consequence is that candidate-level analysis across England and Wales is now viable for the first time this campaign. Cross-referencing the Democracy Club database with party membership data, previous electoral performance, and candidate demographics becomes possible. For Reform UK specifically, the SoPN data reveals where candidate lists are complete and where attrition has shortened them below the six-member maximum in Welsh constituencies.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

When a UK election is called, every candidate who wants to stand must submit official paperwork by a set deadline. Once that deadline passes, the returning officer in each area publishes a list of everyone who is actually on the ballot. This document is called the Statement of Persons Nominated, or SoPN. Democracy Club is a volunteer-run organisation that collects all these lists and builds a single searchable database of every candidate across the whole country. Before the SoPNs are published, they can only estimate who might be standing. After publication, they know for certain. On 7 April, Democracy Club had processed lists for just 81 out of 3,074 areas, covering about 2.6 per cent of the country. By 10 April, after England and Wales published their lists on 9 and 10 April, that jumped to 2,636 areas, or 86 per cent. Scotland had already reached 100 per cent. This matters because it means for the first time this campaign, you can see the complete picture of who is actually standing, which parties are fielding full slates, and where there are gaps.

First Reported In

Update #2 · New Money Rules, Old Party Fractures

Democracy Club· 10 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Candidate Database Jumps From 2.6% to 86% in Three Days
The SoPN data surge closes the structural gap that made candidate-level analysis unreliable until now; verification quality rather than coverage is the remaining variable, with the North East's 39 per cent entry rate the most significant outstanding lag.
Different Perspectives
UK Government (Labour)
UK Government (Labour)
Westminster framed the youth justice transfer as a culmination of prior work rather than a precedent, refused a Section 30 order before the request arrived, and omitted both the Representation of the People Bill and any Wales Bill from the 13 May King's Speech. Starmer is described as open to a devolved-leaders summit in June.
Reform UK
Reform UK
Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk filed pre-action protocol letters framing their LGR challenge as mandate-consistent, while 22 Reform councillors departed in 14 days at an annualised rate nearly three times the 10 percent projection. Richard Tice defended the Harborne 5 million pound gift as unconditional, with no acknowledgement of Farage's two contradictory accounts on record.
SNP (Scottish Government)
SNP (Scottish Government)
Swinney submitted a Section 30 request on 14 May citing the 73-seat SNP-Greens pro-independence bloc and the 2014 Edinburgh Agreement precedent, despite the SNP finishing seven below his self-set 65-seat trigger. Downing Street's contradictory readout of their call suggests Westminster is treating the request as a holding item rather than a live constitutional negotiation.
Welsh Government (Plaid Cymru)
Welsh Government (Plaid Cymru)
ap Iorwerth framed the youth justice transfer as a starting point for his six-power Wales Bill agenda, pressing demands at a phone call with Keir Starmer on 18 May and winning the first statutory function transfer to Cardiff since 1999. The Greens' unwritten confidence-and-supply arrangement gives him 45 of 96 seats, four short of a majority.
Russell Findlay (Scottish Conservatives)
Russell Findlay (Scottish Conservatives)
Findlay refused to resign as Scottish Conservative leader after the party fell to 12 Holyrood seats and lost all five constituency MSPs. He declined Swinney's post-election talks invitation, the only major-party leader to do so.
John Swinney (SNP)
John Swinney (SNP)
Swinney committed on 14 May to a Holyrood Section 30 vote within a week despite winning seven seats fewer than his own trigger threshold, relying on a SNP-Green majority of 73. He tabled a meeting with Starmer; Downing Street disputed that any referendum discussion was agreed.