Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
UK Local Elections 2026
13APR

Candidate Database Jumps From 2.6% to 86% in Three Days

2 min read
16:52UTC

Democracy Club's candidate database went from covering 81 of 3,074 areas to 2,636 in the three days following English and Welsh Statement of Persons Nominated publication. Scotland hit 100 per cent. Volunteer verification of imported records continues; the North East lags at 39 per cent entered.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

SoPN publication closed the candidate data gap, making England and Wales candidate-level analysis viable for the first time.

Democracy Club's candidate database stood at 2.6 per cent coverage, 81 of 3,074 areas, on 7 April 2026 . By 10 April, following English and Welsh Statement of Persons Nominated publication on 9 and 10 April, the database covered 86 per cent: 2,636 areas. Scotland reached 100 per cent before the English and Welsh SoPNs published. The three-day movement represents the largest single data discontinuity in this briefing cycle.

SoPN publication is the mechanism by which returning officers publish the final candidate list for each seat; until it publishes, no authoritative count exists. SoPN publication is the mechanism by which returning officers publish the final list of standing candidates for each seat; until it publishes, no authoritative count of candidates exists. Democracy Club's volunteer network ingests the published documents, enters the data, and double-checks it. As of 10 April, 2,068 areas have candidate data entered and 1,457 are double-checked. The 611 entered-but-not-checked gap represents records awaiting verification, not missing data.

North East England at 39 per cent entered is the most significant regional lag. North East England's 39 per cent entry rate follows a volunteer density pattern: Democracy Club is volunteer-driven, and data entry speed tracks the geographic distribution of its network. The North East has historically had lower volunteer coverage than London and the South East. For any analysis that depends on complete candidate-level data in the North East, the verification lag matters.

The practical consequence is that candidate-level analysis across England and Wales is now viable for the first time this campaign. Cross-referencing the Democracy Club database with party membership data, previous electoral performance, and candidate demographics becomes possible. For Reform UK specifically, the SoPN data reveals where candidate lists are complete and where attrition has shortened them below the six-member maximum in Welsh constituencies.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

When a UK election is called, every candidate who wants to stand must submit official paperwork by a set deadline. Once that deadline passes, the returning officer in each area publishes a list of everyone who is actually on the ballot. This document is called the Statement of Persons Nominated, or SoPN. Democracy Club is a volunteer-run organisation that collects all these lists and builds a single searchable database of every candidate across the whole country. Before the SoPNs are published, they can only estimate who might be standing. After publication, they know for certain. On 7 April, Democracy Club had processed lists for just 81 out of 3,074 areas, covering about 2.6 per cent of the country. By 10 April, after England and Wales published their lists on 9 and 10 April, that jumped to 2,636 areas, or 86 per cent. Scotland had already reached 100 per cent. This matters because it means for the first time this campaign, you can see the complete picture of who is actually standing, which parties are fielding full slates, and where there are gaps.

First Reported In

Update #2 · New Money Rules, Old Party Fractures

Democracy Club· 10 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Candidate Database Jumps From 2.6% to 86% in Three Days
The SoPN data surge closes the structural gap that made candidate-level analysis unreliable until now; verification quality rather than coverage is the remaining variable, with the North East's 39 per cent entry rate the most significant outstanding lag.
Different Perspectives
Ian Davidson, Acting Returning Officer for Clacton
Ian Davidson, Acting Returning Officer for Clacton
Davidson's office printed a 90cm ballot paper for the record 34-candidate field, with nothing in electoral law capping candidate numbers or the £500 deposit each pays. He expects the paper's size to raise printing costs and slow the count into the early hours, a strain that follows from the major parties' boycott, not from turnout.
Scottish Labour members
Scottish Labour members
Members now choose between Michael Marra and Joe Fagan after Monica Lennon fell one MP nomination short of the three-MP, three-MSP threshold, a bar set by MPs and union officials rather than the wider membership. Whoever wins takes office having faced only one rival on the members' ballot.
Labour Party
Labour Party
Labour gained Penistone East from Reform on 20 August but lost Harraby South to Reform the same night, a wash that undercuts any claim of momentum. The party can point to beating Reform in a genuinely fought contest, but not to a pattern running only in its favour.
Liberal Democrats
Liberal Democrats
The Liberal Democrats took two of Reform's May wards, Almondbury on 13 August and St Neots Eynesbury on 20 August, the latter on a 29.8-point rise in their own vote share. Both results let the party claim it is the beneficiary when voters turn against Reform, not Labour or the Conservatives.
Reform UK
Reform UK
Reform UK can point to winning Clacton unopposed by the other major parties and to taking Harraby South from Labour, a ward it had never previously contested. That gives the party two results to cite even as three previously held wards changed hands elsewhere in August.
Sinn Féin
Sinn Féin
Sinn Féin's John O'Dowd ruled out a Stormont walkout on 11 August despite calling the DUP increasingly difficult to work with, closing a question Conor Murphy had left open a fortnight earlier. Only Sinn Féin or the DUP can collapse the joint First Minister office, so the denial gives up the party's own leverage in budget talks.