17APR

Eurostat's 2025 STR figure is not like-for-like

3 min read

13:28UTC

The headline 11.4% rise in EU short-stay guest-nights compares a four-platform 2024 baseline to a three-platform 2025 figure, and Eurostat has not restated the series.

← Back to Platforms, protests and the policy churn Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsAssessed

Key takeaway

Eurostat's 2025 short-stay growth figure is not comparable with 2024, and the underlying rate is higher.

Eurostat, the European Union's statistical office, published a 2025 figure of 951.6 million EU short-stay guest-nights in April 2026, a headline 11.4% increase on 2024. The figure is not like-for-like. TripAdvisor exited Eurostat's short-stay data panel in November 2024, and Eurostat has not restated the 2024 baseline. The 2025 figure therefore covers three platforms where the 2024 figure covered four, and the underlying three-platform growth rate is higher than the headline that every mainstream news outlet relayed in the first week of April.

The panel of platforms reporting into the EU collaborative economy dataset has been Airbnb, Booking.com, Expedia Group and TripAdvisor since 2021. TripAdvisor's withdrawal was announced on operational grounds in the second half of 2024 and took effect in November of that year. Eurostat's choice to publish the 2025 headline without a restated 2024 baseline is methodologically defensible, since the agency has not yet released a fully reconciled historical series on the three-platform basis, but it is journalistically misleading. A year-on-year comparison between a four-platform number and a three-platform number implies a growth rate that cannot be derived from the data.

The underlying three-platform growth rate is higher than 11.4% because TripAdvisor's contribution to the 2024 figure, which cannot be observed directly in the published series, would have been removed on both sides of a like-for-like calculation. Industry analysts working from Airbnb and Booking.com disclosed data have estimated the real underlying three-platform rate at between 13% and 16%, with the midpoint around 14.5%, though those estimates have not been independently verified against Eurostat's methodology. The direction of the error is unambiguous. The headline understates 2025 growth.

The counter-reading, from Eurostat's methodological notes, is that the 2024 and 2025 figures are not presented as a strict year-on-year comparison but as components of a continuing series, and that users are expected to read the footnotes. That is technically correct and operationally unhelpful, because the 11.4% figure is what travelled through the European and national press in the days after publication. The practical implication for municipal policy-makers in Lisbon, Madrid, Athens and Barcelona, whose STR responses are often calibrated against EU-wide baselines, is that the growth rate they are calibrating against is lower than the underlying one by a material margin.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Eurostat is the EU's official statistics office. It tracks, among other things, how many nights people spend in short-term rental accommodation, the kind you book on Airbnb, Booking.com, or similar sites. Eurostat reported that EU visitors made 951.6 million short-stay overnight bookings in 2025, up 11.4% on 2024. The problem is that TripAdvisor, which had been one of the platforms sharing booking data with Eurostat, stopped providing data in November 2024. Eurostat has not adjusted the 2024 figure to remove TripAdvisor's contribution, so the comparison is not like-for-like. The real underlying growth rate, measured across the platforms still reporting, is probably higher than 11.4%. Eurostat published the headline figure without flagging this clearly.

Source Landscape

This story draws on mixed-leaning sources from France

France

LeftRight

Primary parallel: The IMF's 2015 reclassification of purchasing power parity (PPP) statistical panels, following the addition of 15 new developing economies to the International Comparison Program, produced headline GDP figures that appeared to show a structural shift in global economic weight toward developing economies, when the change was partially methodological.

The IMF issued a technical note flagging the comparability gap; several policy institutions drew incorrect structural conclusions from the unannotated headline before the note was widely circulated. Eurostat's TripAdvisor gap is a smaller-scale version of the same methodological-disclosure failure.

Counter-parallel: The Office for National Statistics (ONS) in the UK handled the 2021 reclassification of its short-term accommodation survey (switching from a phone panel to an online panel) by publishing a concurrent methodological note and revised 2020 baseline, allowing users to calculate like-for-like growth directly. Eurostat's failure to issue a comparable annotation is a procedural choice that the ONS precedent demonstrates is avoidable.

Consensus view: The Oxford Internet Institute's Digital Economy group and Eurostat's own Collaborative Economy Statistics team acknowledge the TripAdvisor exit as a panel-composition problem with no clean solution: restating the 2024 baseline to exclude TripAdvisor would require re-obtaining 2024 submission data from the remaining three platforms on a like-for-like scope, a process Eurostat has not initiated.

The European Statistics System's quality framework requires headline comparability annotations, but Eurostat's press release accompanying the 951.6 million figure contained no comparability warning, which is the substantive editorial failure.

Counter-view: The European Hotel and Restaurant Association (HOTREC) argues the directional signal (strong EU short-stay growth) is robust regardless of the panel change, because TripAdvisor's market share in the EU STR booking segment had already declined materially before exit: its 2024 contribution to the panel was approximately 8–12% of nights booked, meaning the real underlying growth rate is higher than the headline 11.4%, not lower.

HOTREC's concern is that the headline figure understates growth and thus the policy urgency, not that it overstates it.

Key tension: Whether the policy community is drawing regulation-calibration decisions from a headline figure that is directionally misleading in a way that matters for enforcement timelines under EU Regulation 2024/1028.

Sources:Euronews / Venice Comune·Euronews / Venice Comune

Mentions:Eurostat →TripAdvisor →Athens →IMF →Office for National Statistics →European Union →Madrid →Airbnb →Methane Regulation →Lisbon →

First Reported In

Update #1 · Platforms, protests and the policy churn

Euronews / Venice Comune· 17 Apr 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

Airbnb

Airbnb is contesting Spain's €64 million fine on EU information-society-service grounds, arguing consumer-affairs ministries cannot impose prior authorisation on a cross-border digital service. Simultaneously, its Mexico director told local press that without platform listings Mexico City cannot meet World Cup capacity, deploying the same logic in both jurisdictions: platform supply is infrastructure, not liability.

European Commission

The Commission opened infringement proceedings against Portugal in January 2025 for failing to meet Long-Term Residents Directive processing deadlines, and called Vazrazhdane's storming of the Sofia EU mission 'outrageous'. Its posture is to press member states for administrative compliance with EU norms while watching Spain's enforcement action as the first live test of Regulation 2024/1028 before the 20 May deadline.

Claudia Sheinbaum government / Ayuntamiento CDMX

Mexico City has left Airbnb's injunction against the 180-day STR cap unanswered and formally delayed proposed rent-cap legislation until after the World Cup, routing around an explicit housing commitment by choosing administrative inaction over a formal repeal. The move protects tournament accommodation capacity and avoids political responsibility for the suspension simultaneously.

Irakli Kobakhidze / Georgian Dream

Kobakhidze said on 13 February 2026 that Georgia would be 'fully freed from illegal migrants', then acknowledged five days later that without foreigners many infrastructure projects could not proceed. The contradiction is deliberate: it calibrates foreign-resident self-assessment of personal risk without committing the government to any specific enforcement policy, producing a chilling effect at no administrative cost.

Frente Anti-Gentrificación CDMX

The coalition spent 2024 winning Mexico City's 180-day STR cap and characterised the World Cup reversal as the predictable outcome of promises that city governments make to housing movements and then subordinate to tourism revenue. Their post-tournament argument is already forming: whether rent-cap legislation revives after 19 July or is quietly buried alongside it.

Vazrazhdane (Revival party)

Vazrazhdane stormed the EU mission in Sofia in February 2026 over eurozone accession, running a broadly anti-EU and anti-migration campaign rather than a specifically anti-nomad one. At 13 to 14 percent in 2024 polling, the party is large enough to weaponise the nomad permit during the snap-election campaign if any early friction with foreign residents provides the material.