Skip to content
Iran Conflict 2026
5MAR

35,000 seafarers and passengers stranded

3 min read
15:17UTC

Twenty thousand seafarers and fifteen thousand cruise passengers are trapped on vessels in an active conflict zone, with no insurance, no transits, and no way out.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

As crew contract limits are reached en masse in coming weeks, captains may be legally compelled to declare marine emergencies to justify unauthorised port entries — generating additional diplomatic incidents beyond the conflict's primary theatres.

IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez warned that approximately 20,000 seafarers and 15,000 cruise passengers are stranded in Gulf and Arabian Sea waters. Many seafarers have completed their employment contracts and are legally entitled to repatriation, but no route exists.

The stranding follows the complete collapse of commercial shipping insurance for The Gulf. The P&I deadline passed at midnight Thursday with no new commercial transits through the Strait of Hormuz; more than 150 vessels sit at anchor. Vessel traffic through Hormuz had already fallen 80% below normal before the insurance withdrawal made remaining transits uninsurable. The 35,000 figure represents people on vessels that cannot legally move — their insurance is void, the waterway is a combat zone, and the Sonangol Namibe was struck and leaked cargo 30 nautical miles southeast of Kuwait , confirming that commercial vessels are not exempt from attack.

The human cost falls disproportionately on seafarers from the Philippines, India, Indonesia, and Bangladesh — countries whose nationals make up the majority of the world's approximately 1.89 million active merchant sailors. The 15,000 cruise passengers are a visible emergency with diplomatic weight behind their extraction. The 20,000 seafarers — largely invisible, working below decks on tankers and bulk carriers — face weeks or months of uncertainty with minimal consular leverage.

A Ceasefire tomorrow would not move these vessels. Insurers would require weeks to reassess risk. Port authorities would need to clear backlogs. Each day the stranding persists, it erodes the willingness of seafarers to accept future Gulf deployments — a long-term consequence for the region's maritime labour supply that outlasts whatever diplomatic resolution eventually comes.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Seafarers have legally binding contracts capping how long they can work continuously at sea — typically six to eleven months — after which international law requires their employer to return them home. With Gulf and Arabian Sea ports closed or dangerous and the regional hub airports (Dubai, Doha, Bahrain) paralysed, there is no mechanism to fulfil this obligation. Unlike cruise passengers, who are guests, seafarers are employees with enforceable legal rights, and their employers face mounting liability with every passing day. When contract limits are reached, a ship's captain has a legal duty to seek the nearest safe port regardless of geopolitical conditions — creating a separate, rolling series of crises that cannot be resolved commercially.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The IMO figure of 35,000 is almost certainly an undercount: IMO tallies depend on flag-state voluntary reporting that lags reality by days and excludes undocumented vessels and informal maritime workers prevalent in Gulf dhow and offshore supply-boat sectors. The true stranded figure is likely materially higher.

Root Causes

Global shipping's crew rotation infrastructure is concentrated in four Gulf hub airports — Dubai, Doha, Bahrain, and Abu Dhabi — that collectively handle the majority of international seafarer transit flights. This geographic concentration was a documented systemic risk that the industry never redundancy-planned for a simultaneous multi-port closure scenario; no alternative hub network was developed despite multiple prior Gulf tension episodes.

Escalation

Vessels that departed before 28 February are approaching the outer limits of standard crew contract durations. As those limits are reached in batches over the coming three to five weeks, the maritime crisis will generate a cascade of individual legal emergencies requiring state-level diplomatic intervention — each one a potential trigger for new incidents independent of the conflict's trajectory.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    The IMO Secretary-General's public warning signals that the organisation's internal assessment has concluded voluntary commercial resolution is insufficient and that state-level intervention is required — a threshold the IMO did not cross until week three of the COVID crew change crisis.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Vessels reaching maximum contract durations will create a rolling series of crew change emergencies over the next three to five weeks, each requiring individual diplomatic resolution between flag states, port states, and conflict parties.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Risk

    If the crisis extends beyond six weeks, recruitment pipelines for seafarers will contract as the profession becomes acutely dangerous, prolonging the maritime labour shortage well beyond the conflict's eventual resolution.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Precedent

    This event may drive IMO to establish a formal conflict-zone crew rotation protocol — analogous to the COVID 'key worker' framework — specifying state obligations to facilitate crew changes during armed conflicts affecting international shipping lanes.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #22 · IRGC drones hit Azerbaijan; CIA link cut

The National· 5 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
South Korean financial markets
South Korean financial markets
South Korea, which imports virtually all its crude oil, is absorbing the war's economic transmission most acutely among non-belligerents. The second KOSPI circuit breaker in four sessions — with Samsung down over 10% and SK Hynix down 12.3% — reflects an industrial economy unable to reprice energy costs that have risen 72% in ten days. The market response indicates Korean industry cannot sustain oil above $100 per barrel without margin compression across manufacturing, semiconductors, and shipping.
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
The first confirmed civilian deaths in Saudi Arabia — one Indian and one Bangladeshi killed, twelve Bangladeshis wounded — fell on communities with no voice in the military decisions that placed them in harm's way. Migrant workers live near military installations because that housing is affordable, not by choice. Bangladesh and India face the dilemma of needing to protect nationals who cannot easily leave a war zone while depending on Gulf remittances that fund a substantial share of their domestic economies.
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Aliyev treats the Nakhchivan strikes as a direct act of war against Azerbaijani sovereignty, placing armed forces on full combat readiness and demanding an Iranian explanation. The response is calibrated to maximise international sympathy while stopping short of military retaliation — Baku cannot fight Iran alone and needs either Turkish or NATO backing to credibly deter further strikes.
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
The Hormuz closure is an existential threat. Japan, South Korea, and India receive the majority of their crude through the strait — they will bear the heaviest economic cost of a war they had no part in.
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.
Turkey
Turkey
Has absorbed three Iranian ballistic missile interceptions since 4 March without invoking NATO Article 5 consultation. Each incident narrows Ankara's political room to continue absorbing without Alliance-level response.