Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21SEP

Clean spark spread reaches €74

2 min read
15:34UTC

Germany's clean spark spread reached roughly €74/MWh on 30 June, reversing a three-week run of losses, as EUA carbon held the €80 handle at €80.17.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

A high day-ahead lifted Germany's spark spread to €74; carbon near €80 caps the margin.

Germany's clean spark spread widened to roughly €74/MWh on 30 June, its best reading since the early-June heat series 1. Take the day-ahead high, subtract about €88 of gas input and €32 of carbon at a 50%-efficiency CCGT, and the gross generating margin lands there. Three weeks earlier the same spread sat near EUR -8 to -9, with CCGTs losing money on every dispatched megawatt .

The carbon leg moved too. EUA (EU Allowance) permits slipped to €79.25 on 29 June, briefly losing the €80 handle, then recovered to €80.17 on 30 June 2 . EUA had first broken above €80 on 25 June, and holding that level keeps the carbon cost near €32/MWh.

That €32 carbon charge is what holds the German margin in check. Strip the permits out and the same day-ahead high would clear a spark spread well above €100. The reversal from three weeks of losses tracks the day-ahead rather than any fall in gas: at an unchanged €88 fuel leg, the power price alone turned the spread positive.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The clean spark spread is the profit a gas power plant earns per megawatt-hour it generates, after paying for the gas fuel and for EU carbon pollution permits. When the price of electricity is high and the price of gas and carbon is low, the spread is wide and generators make good money. When the price of electricity is low or gas and carbon are expensive, the spread can go negative, meaning operators lose money on each unit of electricity they produce. On 30 June, three things aligned to produce the widest spread since early June: electricity prices reached €195 per megawatt-hour because wind was almost absent and demand was high; gas prices stayed at €40-44 because Gulf tensions had eased; and EU carbon permits recovered to €80 per tonne. A generator burning gas to make one megawatt-hour of electricity paid about €88 for fuel and €32 for carbon permits, leaving a gross margin of about €74. Three weeks earlier, the same calculation gave a loss of €8-9 per megawatt-hour. The difference is almost entirely the electricity price: it was €70 higher on 30 June than on 8 June.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The €74 spread on 30 June required three conditions to converge simultaneously. First, €195/MWh day-ahead clearing: produced by the lowest wind week of 2026 coinciding with a summer heat surge, as documented in event 5.

Second, €40-44 TTF: the Hormuz de-escalation of 17 June drained the geopolitical risk premium and the pipeline ban binding with no snap-back left no recovery bid. Third, EUA at €80.17/tCO2: the carbon leg recovered after the €79.25 dip on 29 June, maintaining the €32/MWh carbon input that keeps the spread below what a carbon-free calculation would yield.

Remove any one condition and the spread collapses: at spring TTF of €47-52 with the same €195 day-ahead and €80 EUA, the marginal cost rises to €134-144/MWh and the spread falls to €51-61/MWh, below most fixed-O&M recovery thresholds.

At €195 power with €44 gas but EUA at €70, the carbon leg falls to €28/MWh, reducing marginal cost by €4/MWh and boosting the spread to €78, a minor change that confirms gas price, not carbon, is the dominant spread driver in the current €40-44 TTF regime.

First Reported In

Update #22 · Germany refills as the autumn cliff nears

euenergy.live· 30 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.