Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
7SEP

War-risk claims reach about $2bn, Lloyd's List says

1 min read
14:39UTC

David Osler, marine insurance editor at Lloyd's List, put cumulative war-risk claims across the conflict at roughly $2bn as of 3 September.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

About $2bn in war-risk claims is repriced into every voyage, including the ships never attacked.

David Osler, marine insurance editor at Lloyd's List, estimated cumulative war-risk claims across the conflict at about $2bn as of 3 September 1. War-risk cover is the separate policy a shipowner buys against war, mines, seizure and hostile attack, priced as a percentage of a vessel's insured value for each voyage into a listed area.

Underwriters replace paid claims out of future premiums, so a loss run of this size is repriced into every voyage through the listed waters, including the ships nobody has touched. Protection and indemnity clubs cancelled Gulf war-risk cover in August and then repurchased it on new terms , which is the market doing the same arithmetic in advance. A vessel off Yemen was written off as a constructive total loss in the same week .

The figure comes from one editor at one publication and covers the whole conflict rather than any single week, so it is an estimate of an aggregate rather than a tally of settled claims. Nobody publishes a running total of Gulf war-risk payouts, which is why an informed estimate is the best available number and why the next one is worth comparing against this one.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

David Osler edits marine insurance and law coverage at Lloyd's List, a trade publication that tracks shipping. He estimated that insurers have now paid out roughly $2bn in war-risk claims, the special cover shipowners buy against attack, mines and seizure, since fighting in the region began. That figure is not the cost of any one ship or one strike; it is a running total across the whole conflict. A number this size gets built into the price every shipowner pays to insure a voyage through the region, whether or not that particular ship is ever attacked.

First Reported In

Update #176 · Three tankers for two warships

Euronews Turkiye· 7 Sept 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi
Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi
Golden Global told Turkey's KAP on 4 September that the parties OFAC named are not its customers and it had no dealings with them. It plans to contest the designation.
CENTCOM (US Central Command)
CENTCOM (US Central Command)
CENTCOM says its ships evaded the IRGC's 5 September missiles unharmed, then disabled two Iranian tankers and destroyed a third within hours. Admiral Cooper named that three-for-two ratio himself.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
The IRGC Navy claimed strikes on six vessels, three tankers and three US-linked ships, on 5 and 6 September, naming none of them. It conceded its own tankers were hit.
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.