Hengaw's 9th casualty report is overdue by five or more days. The organisation had been publishing on a regular cycle since the war began. Its last confirmed figure, 6,900 killed through Day 29 , is a floor, not a ceiling. Hengaw had previously gone silent for five days in late March . That the war's only independent casualty monitor cannot, or will not, publish should be read as a figure in its own right.
3SEP
Hengaw Casualty Monitor Silent for Five Days
1 min read
16:40UTC
The war's only independent casualty monitor has gone quiet. The last confirmed figure of 6,900 killed is a floor.
ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway
What the independent casualty monitor is not telling us is itself evidence.
Deep Analysis
In plain English
Hengaw is an independent human rights organisation that monitors casualties in Iran. It has been publishing regular reports since the war began, tracking deaths that the Iranian government does not publicly confirm. Its 9th report is now more than five days late. The last figure it published was 6,900 killed through Day 29. Five days of war have passed since then with no update. The silence could mean the organisation is being suppressed, that it is overwhelmed, or that the pace of casualties has exceeded its capacity to verify. Any of those explanations suggests the true toll is higher, not lower.
First Reported In
Update #55 · The Last Door Closes
CNN / Al Jazeera / Axios· 2 Apr 2026
Read original →Causes and effects
This Event
Hengaw Casualty Monitor Silent for Five Days
The silence of the only independent casualty source is itself evidence of the war's human toll.
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.