15JUN

Thirteen airlines book out to October

2 min read

11:40UTC

Thirteen foreign airlines have pushed their Gulf suspensions out to October after EASA advised European carriers to avoid four countries' airspace. Etihad is still flying from Abu Dhabi.

← Back to Trump declares Iran war over Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

Carriers have booked their absence from the Gulf through October, a forecast rather than a reaction.

Thirteen foreign airlines have extended suspensions of flights to the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar through October, following a bulletin from the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on 14 July advising European carriers to avoid all four countries' airspace ¹.

Carriers plan crews, slots and aircraft rotations months ahead of departure. A suspension carried as far forward as October is a commercial judgement that this war does not finish in the summer, taken by planners who lose money whichever way they are wrong. Cancel too far out and the aircraft sits idle while rivals sell the route; cancel too late and the airline is paying for crews stranded on a field that shuts without notice.

Kuwait's airport suspended flights outright last week as Gulf carriers cut their services . That was a reaction to the day's events. Booking October is something else.

Etihad Airways has not grounded operations. As of Monday 20 July it was still flying most of its network out of Zayed International Airport in Abu Dhabi, having cancelled only its Kuwait and Bahrain services in mid-July ². A Gulf carrier operating from a Gulf hub reads the same airspace differently from a European one working to an EASA bulletin, and the split is visible in the timetables.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency, a regulator that advises airlines on where it is unsafe to fly, told European carriers on 14 July to avoid the airspace over the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. Airlines from outside Europe often follow EASA's lead because it affects their insurance and legal position even when they are not legally bound by it. Thirteen foreign airlines have now extended their suspensions of flights to those four countries all the way through October, rather than reviewing the situation week by week. Etihad Airways, based in Abu Dhabi, is the exception: it is still flying most of its network, having only cancelled flights to Kuwait and Bahrain specifically.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

EASA bulletins are advisory, not binding on non-EU carriers, but they function as a liability shield: an airline that ignores a published EASA warning and then suffers a loss over Gulf airspace faces a harder insurance and litigation position than one that followed it. That is why 13 carriers extended suspensions well beyond the EU's own jurisdiction.

Etihad's narrower response, cutting only Kuwait and Bahrain while keeping most of its network flying from Zayed International, is the one confirmed exception to that pattern. The research available does not establish why Etihad's risk calculus differs from the other 13 carriers; that gap is worth watching rather than filling in.

What could happen next?

Consequence
An October horizon gives Gulf airports and tourism-dependent carriers a fixed planning window rather than an indefinite one, but it also locks in roughly ten weeks of lost transit and inbound traffic regardless of how the conflict develops before then.

Source Landscape

This story draws on right-leaning sources from Türkiye

Türkiye

LeftRight

Immediate impact: 13 foreign carriers now hold suspensions through October rather than reviewing week by week, which converts a war-risk cost into a budgeted one. Airlines can hedge fuel and reroute crews against a known October date; insurers can price a fixed-term war-risk exclusion instead of an open-ended one.

Structural: the split matters more than the total. Etihad has cancelled only its Kuwait and Bahrain routes and kept flying most of its network from Zayed International, which shows the underlying risk pricing is being done airport by airport, not blanket-applied across the whole Gulf. Carriers are treating EASA's 14 July bulletin as a floor, not a template: some have gone further (full October suspensions), Etihad has gone narrower.

Sources:Anadolu Agency

Mentions:United Arab Emirates (UAE) →Bahrain →Kuwait →Qatar →Etihad Airways →Zayed International Airport →Abu Dhabi →European Union →Emirates →

First Reported In

Update #159 · A second strait closes by radio alone

Anadolu Agency· 22 Jul 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Kuwait's airport shuts as Gulf carriers retreat

Kuwait's outright flight suspension on 18 July is the reactive precedent against which the 13 airlines' forward booking to October reads as a forecast.

Occurred 17 Jul 2026

Read story →

This Event

Thirteen airlines book out to October

Airlines are now planning around this war as far ahead as October, which prices a forecast rather than a reaction.

Different Perspectives

Shipping and insurance underwriters

Underwriters can price Houthi strikes because the group announces its targets, but an unclaimed drone at Damietta and a mandatory Iranian insurance scheme both deny them a pattern to price against. War-risk premiums are increasingly being set by the absence of a claimant, not the scale of the damage.

Jordan

Azraq absorbed its fourth Iranian strike in seven weeks, again drawing no direct Jordanian retaliation, only an American one. Amman's exposure, hosting US basing without the Patriot density of Gulf allies, has not changed even as the war around it widens.

Houthi movement

The Houthis' 20 July blockade of Saudi-linked shipping is the injury Riyadh's new 43-nation coalition directly answers, yet the group itself was never asked to join and remains outside every proposal on the table. Sanaa-aligned commentators call the coalition a paper reassurance for insurers rather than a deployable force.

Egypt's Cabinet

Egypt confirmed the Damietta blaze was an attack, not an accident, on soil the war had never touched before. Cairo now faces an unclaimed threat to a facility supplying roughly 7% of its domestic gas, with no author to hold accountable and no pattern yet to defend against.

Oman

Muscat is running the only channel Iran will use, a voluntary Hormuz fee modelled on Malacca, but stayed out of Saudi Arabia's new naval coalition entirely. Oman's mediating leverage depends on treating Hormuz as shared and non-exclusive, the opposite of what Tehran is now demanding of it.

Iraq's Prime Minister

Al-Zaidi cancelled his first official Riyadh visit and convened the Coordination Framework, the coalition that keeps him in power and whose factions sit inside the PMF that Saudi jets just struck. He is caught between a five-year Saudi investment relationship and armed groups inside his own state he does not fully control.