The Pentagon revised its official wounded count to 365, up from 303 . The Intercept's investigation, based on hospital admissions, medevac records, and unnamed officials, put the figure at 520 or more. The revised number closes the gap slightly but remains roughly 30% below the independent estimate. Neither figure includes casualties from the 3 April F-15E and A-10 incidents. The real total is likely above 540. 1
11JUN
Pentagon revises US wounded count to 365
1 min read
09:17UTC
The official count rose by 62 but remains 30% below The Intercept's independent estimate of 520 or more.
ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway
Official casualty figures remain 30% below independent estimates, excluding 3 April losses.
Deep Analysis
In plain English
The US military's official wounded count rose from 303 to 365. But an independent investigation by The Intercept, using hospital records and Pentagon sources, estimated the real figure is 520 or more. Neither number includes the new casualties from 3 April's aircraft losses. Congress is being asked to approve $200 billion for this war based on data that the Pentagon's own sources say is incomplete by at least 30%.
What could happen next?
- Consequence
Congress votes on war funding using official casualty data that independent sources place 30% too low, undermining the political basis for the $200 billion supplemental.
- Risk
Earlier casualty data showed 75% or more of wounded suffered traumatic brain injuries (ID:1690), a figure still absent from official reporting and likely to become a political liability.
First Reported In
Update #58 · First US aircraft fall over Iran
Washington Post / Financial Times· 4 Apr 2026
Read original →Causes and effects
This Event
Pentagon revises US wounded count to 365
Congress is voting on war funding with casualty data the Pentagon's own sources describe as incomplete.
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.