Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Tech Sovereignty
10JUN

Sanctions licence dies in OFAC silence

4 min read
10:31UTC

OFAC let General Licence V expire at 12:01am Eastern on Sunday with no guidance on whether Hengli's refinery restructure clears the 50% ownership test; banks open Monday in the dark.

TechnologyAssessed
Key takeaway

A US sanctions exemption on a Chinese refiner lapsed with no guidance, leaving banks to guess their exposure.

OFAC, the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, let General Licence V expire at 12:01am Eastern on Sunday 24 May without publishing any extension, replacement, or guidance 1. The licence, signed on 24 April under Executive Order 13902, had authorised firms to wind down dealings with Hengli Petrochemical's sanctioned Dalian refinery. From Monday's Asia open, any non-US bank clearing dollars for Hengli faces a secondary-sanctions designation of its own.

The silence matters because of a structural question nobody answered. On 21 May, Hengli's Singapore Arm transferred 95% of the Dalian refinery to Dalian Changxing, a Chinese state-linked trading house . OFAC's 50% rule treats any entity owned 50% or more by a blocked person as itself blocked. The transfer therefore clears sanctions only if Dalian Changxing is genuinely independent of the Hengli structure; if it is a front, the asset stays blocked and so does every bank that touches its dollars. No bank and no regulator answered that question before the deadline.

The expiry was mechanical, set on 24 April and immovable. The deal Trump declared the same weekend was verbal and contingent . Treasury enforcement and presidential diplomacy ran on the same Sunday without referencing each other, because one answers to a calendar and the other to a Truth Social post. OFAC's refusal to rule before the deadline is itself the enforcement posture: compliance desks must assume exposure and price it in.

Beijing had already moved. China's National Financial Regulatory Administration ordered banks on 1 May to stop new lending to five US-sanctioned refineries, while telling them not to demand repayment of existing credit 2. That order, alongside MOFCOM's Announcement No. 21 blocking statute, shields the same five refiners OFAC has pointedly declined to designate. Asia opens Monday with the legal status of every Hengli dollar trade unresolved, the enforcement clock running, and the promised waivers conditional on a text that does not yet exist.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) administers America's sanctions programmes, effectively deciding which companies are barred from using US dollars. A rule called the '50% rule' says that if a sanctioned entity owns 50% or more of another company, that company is treated as sanctioned too. In April, OFAC sanctioned Hengli Petrochemical, a large Chinese oil refinery. Three days before a key OFAC deadline expired on 24 May, Hengli's Singapore trading arm transferred 95% of the Dalian refinery to a different Chinese company called Dalian Changxing. Hengli's argument was: we no longer own more than 50% of the refinery, so the new company (Dalian Changxing) should not count as sanctioned. OFAC's deadline expired on 24 May without the bureau clarifying whether it agrees. This matters because any bank clearing US dollars for Hengli or Dalian Changxing now faces potential US penalties from Monday, but nobody knows for certain whether those penalties actually apply. Banks must decide whether to keep processing the trades or freeze them while waiting for clarity that may never come.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

OFAC's General Licence V (GL V) was the only signed Iran instrument of the entire 80-day war. Its 30-day wind-down period ending 24 May was a fixed administrative deadline rather than a policy choice.

The bureau's silence on the Dalian Changxing restructure reflects a structural constraint: issuing a ruling that the restructure is clean would effectively endorse the evasion mechanism and invite its replication across all five NFRA-protected refineries. Issuing a ruling that the restructure is tainted would force a direct confrontation with Beijing at a moment when the Trump-Xi relationship is the primary channel for China's Hormuz-transit diplomacy.

The 95% Dalian Changxing stake is this event's unique load-bearing figure: a Chinese state-linked entity now controls the refinery, OFAC's 50% ownership rule applies automatically to any entity 50%-or-more owned by a blocked person, but 'owned by' requires tracing beneficial ownership through Dalian Changxing back to the original sanctioned structure, which OFAC has not done. Banks must self-assess, with no guidance.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Non-US banks that continue clearing Hengli dollar trades from Monday face live secondary-sanctions exposure with no guidance covering their position. One enforcement action against a major correspondent bank would trigger industry-wide freezing of similar trades.

  • Consequence

    The 95% Dalian Changxing restructure, if accepted de facto by OFAC's silence, becomes a template for all five NFRA-protected refineries to exit the formal sanctions perimeter, hollowing out the Iran energy-sanctions architecture without a single enforcement action.

First Reported In

Update #106 · Trump says deal; OFAC says nothing

US Treasury OFAC· 24 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud providers gain a binding procurement mandate from CADA, confirmed by Gartner's $12.6bn sovereign-cloud figure for 2026. The $40bn Pax Silica commitment signals Brussels will not extend sovereignty discipline to the silicon layer, and the missing €350m Sovereign Tech Fund leaves open-source maintenance infrastructure unfunded beneath those same clouds.
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Science Secretary Kendall's £1.1bn Hardware Plan on 8 June chose demand-side instruments, advancing £150m to British chip startups via the British Business Bank, where Brussels chose supply-side alliance membership. Britain joined Pax Silica before the EU and has no collective EU procurement leverage; the Hardware Plan is the bilateral answer to the same silicon gap.
United States
United States
Pax Silica, a State Department initiative launched in December 2025, secured EU membership the same afternoon Brussels adopted its cloud sovereignty law. Ambassador Puzder had named CADA a red line against the EU-US trade framework; the narrowed CADA scope and the $40bn chip commitment together represent the settlement Washington sought.
France
France
France was the only EU state to oppose Pax Silica accession at COREPER on 3 June, asking the Commission to clarify the Council's steering role inside the alliance. Paris backed CADA and hosts Mistral AI; a $40bn US-chip commitment contractually narrows the commercial space for the sovereign AI model that France is trying to scale.
European Commission
European Commission
Von der Leyen framed CADA on 3 June as keeping 'most of our market open to like-minded partners', and the Commission's EVP Virkkunen simultaneously required majority-European ownership for the €4.12bn AI Gigafactories call. Brussels is managing rather than resolving the silicon dependency by asserting regulatory control at the cloud layer while formalising the chip relationship through Pax Silica.
European Central Bank
European Central Bank
The ECB's digital euro pilot drew more than 50 PSP applications and is naming 10 to 30 participants in July, advancing on its own monetary mandate without requiring a Commission act. Its trajectory this week is the inverse of CAIDA's: the sovereignty instrument that restricts no US firm is the only one keeping its published calendar.