Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Drones: Industry & Defence
14JUL

Gauntlet II sets five-week build sprint

2 min read
08:57UTC

The Pentagon's 19 Gauntlet II finalists gather at Fort Carson, Colorado in August, each given about five weeks to build 120 lethality-payload drones, with officials expecting to order 50,000 to 60,000 more from the top performers.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Nineteen finalists build 120 drones each in five weeks at Fort Carson, chasing a 50,000-unit follow-on order.

The Pentagon's 19 Gauntlet II finalists will gather at Fort Carson, Colorado in August, each given about five weeks to build 120 lethality-payload drones. Gauntlet II is the US military's competitive drone build-off, run to find suppliers who can manufacture attack drones at wartime rates rather than merely demonstrate a good prototype. Fort Carson, a US Army installation, hosts the sprint that turns the contest from paper claims into hardware on a bench.

Defence officials expect to order 50,000 to 60,000 more drones from the top performers, plural. That plural is the operative word. The field was cut to 19 firms on 2 July , and spreading a 50,000-unit order across several of them rather than a single champion is the clearest operational expression of the distributed-award pattern running through the week's contracts. The buyers want many suppliers who can produce at rate, and the sprint is how they find out who actually can.

The rules carry forward from earlier stages. Gauntlet Stage 1 tested 49 companies and set a bar on Chinese-sourced motors and batteries , a supply-chain condition the Fort Carson finalists must still meet. The programme opened at Camp Grayling on 8 June , so the August sprint is the next gate in a contest designed from the start to reward manufacturing depth over a single clever design.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Pentagon is running a competition called Gauntlet II to find companies that can mass-produce cheap, armed drones. Out of 49 companies that originally entered, 19 finalists now have to travel to Fort Carson, an army base in Colorado, and actually build 120 of these drones in about five weeks, rather than just describe what they could build. Officials say the companies that do this well could then be asked to build 50,000 to 60,000 more. For readers, this is the US military testing suppliers by making them prove they can deliver at speed under pressure, before committing to the far bigger order that would follow.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The five-week Fort Carson build sprint is only reachable because of a filter the Pentagon already applied at Gauntlet II's first stage: Camp Grayling's 20 June cut from 49 to 19 finalists carried forward a requirement barring Chinese-origin components , meaning every surviving firm has already demonstrated it can source airframes and electronics without the cheaper Shenzhen-linked supply chains most commercial drone makers still depend on.

That earlier filter, not the five-week deadline itself, is what makes the sprint's 120-unit target realistic rather than aspirational.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Gauntlet II's Fort Carson sprint functions as a live production audition rather than a paper evaluation, testing whether finalists can actually build at the pace a 50,000-60,000-unit order would require.

  • Consequence

    Finalists already screened for non-Chinese-origin components must now prove they can scale that supply chain under time pressure, not just source it in small volumes.

First Reported In

Update #15 · Two $500m drone deals, still no winner

The Defense Post· 14 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Procurement sceptics
Procurement sceptics
Two identically sized IDIQs to different primes within seven weeks, and a five-nation pact where one partner moves weeks ahead of the rest, could just as easily read as an industrial base still improvising vendor mix as a deliberate hedging doctrine. Neither ceiling appears sized against a validated requirement yet.
Chinese component suppliers
Chinese component suppliers
FCC and Pentagon-level restrictions on Chinese-origin airframes and motors have progressively excluded DJI-linked suppliers from federal counter-drone catalogues, narrowing the field JIATF-401 and Gauntlet II can buy from to a short list of certified domestic bidders. Beijing reads the exclusions as protectionism dressed as security policy.
Quantum Systems
Quantum Systems
Blackstone, Airbus, Advent and Noteus reportedly priced the Munich drone maker at $8 billion, more than double its prior mark, on the strength of 19,000 Ukraine missions rather than confirmed revenue. It is betting production capacity, not current sales, is what buyout capital is now paying for.
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Britain released the first LEAP effector money three weeks after its defence secretary quit over the size of the drone budget, splitting £3.16 million across three small firms rather than one contractor. It expects the other four LEAP partners to follow its pace, not set their own.
JIATF-401
JIATF-401
The task force handed AeroVironment a $500 million counter-drone ceiling identical to Perennial Autonomy's from seven weeks earlier, while its own Gauntlet II red team prepares to attack the drones the winners of that sprint will build. It expects to keep several qualified suppliers warm rather than certify one.
DroneShield
DroneShield
DroneShield appointed retired Rear Admiral Lee Goddard as an independent director from 1 July, its second board move since founder Oleg Vornik's April exit. The ASIC probe into November's disclosures and share sales stays open, so the admiral steadies the story without closing the file.