Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Cybersecurity: Threats and Defences
22OCT

UTA0576 hit Ivanti VPNs before a fix

3 min read
16:31UTC

Volexity found an unknown actor exploiting three chained Ivanti Connect Secure flaws from 3 October, ten days before Ivanti disclosed the first. The last link still has no patch, and Ivanti's own checker saw nothing.

TechnologyAssessed
Key takeaway

Patching the first Ivanti flaw leaves the chain open and the stolen directory passwords still valid.

US security firm Volexity found an unknown actor it tracks as UTA0576 exploiting three flaws used in sequence in Ivanti Connect Secure, the gateway staff use to log in to an internal network from outside, from 3 October, ten days before Ivanti disclosed the first of them⁠1. That made them zero-days: flaws attacked before the maker has a fix. Ivanti disclosed the first link, CVE-2026-104935, an authentication bypass (it lets an attacker in without a password) rated 8.6 out of 10 for severity, on 13 October. CISA, the US federal cyber-defence agency, added it to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalogue the same day with a three-day deadline for federal agencies to patch.

The third link, a privilege escalation (it turns that foothold into full control of the box), has no patch. Ivanti promises one "in the coming weeks", so an agency that met the 16 October deadline still runs an exploitable chain.

UTA0576 left nothing on disk: no web shell (a hidden back door file) and no malware. It broke in afresh for every command, wiped its tracks from two logs, and altered the device's software only in running memory, so Ivanti's own Integrity Checker Tool saw nothing. It took the passwords the box uses to query the company's staff directory, administrator passwords for Windows machines and BitLocker recovery keys (which unlock encrypted laptop drives), then tried those passwords across the network. Volexity leans, with low confidence, towards a criminal motive over espionage, and names no state.

The NetScaler ADC attacks in September copied staff-directory passwords the same way. Upgrading the appliance does not undo what was taken from it, so the fix includes rotating every directory secret the box held. The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) flagged active Ivanti exploitation on 20 October⁠2.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Many companies let staff log in from outside the office through a box called a VPN gateway; Ivanti Connect Secure is one of them. Security firm Volexity found an unknown attacker breaking into these boxes from 3 October using three flaws, before Ivanti had any fix. The attacker left no files behind, so Ivanti's own checking tool missed it. It stole passwords and the keys that unlock encrypted laptop drives. A software update does not change stolen passwords, so companies also need to reset them. One of the three flaws still has no fix.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

VPN gateways authenticate users against the corporate directory, so they store bind credentials with read access to it. That design turns every gateway into a cache of domain secrets.

Vendor integrity tools compare files on disk with known-good versions. An attacker who alters libraries only in memory, and re-exploits for every command, leaves nothing on disk for such a tool to flag.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Organisations that upgraded Ivanti Connect Secure without rotating directory and administrator credentials remain exposed to reuse of what UTA0576 took.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    The unpatched privilege-escalation link keeps fully upgraded appliances exploitable until Ivanti ships its promised fix.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Meaning

    A clean Integrity Checker Tool result no longer rules out compromise on Ivanti appliances.

    Medium term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #15 · Fridge hack spoils food in seven countries

Volexity· 22 Oct 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
UTA0576 hit Ivanti VPNs before a fix
A US agency that met CISA's 16 October deadline still runs an exploitable chain, and the passwords taken from the appliance stay valid until rotated.
Different Perspectives
Hospital Sírio-Libanês
Hospital Sírio-Libanês
Hospital Sírio-Libanês said a 21 September attack reached a reporting system for its social projects, possibly exposing patients' and staff identity numbers and health information, while its general patient database was untouched. It notified the ANPD and the Polícia Federal and warned of fraud attempts.
The Foschini Group
The Foschini Group
The Foschini Group told the Johannesburg exchange on 13 October that an attack found on 11 October disrupted IT systems at its TFG London brands, while stores stayed open. It has not identified the attackers or established whether personal data was taken.
FirstVDS
FirstVDS
FirstVDS said attackers used a VMmanager 6 flaw to copy customers' passwords, cloud credentials and cryptocurrency wallets from beneath their virtual servers, and told notified customers to assume theft and rotate credentials. ISPsystem's flaw was not fully fixed on 19 October.
ESET
ESET
ESET says Russia-aligned UAC-0099 phished a Ukrainian grain logistics firm in July 2025 and apparently passed its access to GRU-linked Sandworm, which wiped the company's data that September. It treats the attackers' use of the Yggdrasil network as a first for a state-aligned actor.
JPCERT/CC
JPCERT/CC
JPCERT/CC issued emergency alert AT-2026-0032 on 14 October as EG Secure Solutions confirmed attacks on the SiteGuard Server Edition flaw. It told operators to save diagnostic data before updating, because the update may erase traces of the attack.
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore said on 20 October that attackers are exploiting Ivanti Connect Secure, seven days after Ivanti's disclosure, having flagged PAN-OS exploitation on 16 October. It issued a PHP2Shell alert on 21 October, the day the fixes shipped.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.