Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
28MAR

Close Brothers cuts 600, blames AI

1 min read
19:20UTC

A UK banking group announced layoffs one day after a short-seller flagged a billion-pound liability. AI was named as a reason. It may not be the real one.

EconomicAssessed
Key takeaway

Close Brothers cited AI for job cuts one day after a short-seller flagged a billion-pound liability.

Close Brothers, a UK banking group, announced 600 job cuts on 23 March as part of an £85 million cost-cutting programme, citing AI deployment and offshoring. 1 The announcement came one day after a short-seller warned of a £1.2 billion hit from the car finance scandal.

AI and offshoring appear in the same sentence. When companies face financial pressure from multiple directions, AI becomes a convenient explanation for cuts that serve other purposes, precisely the pattern the "AI-washing" thesis predicted .

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Close Brothers is a UK bank that announced it was cutting 600 jobs, naming AI and offshoring as the reasons. The announcement came one day after a short-seller, an investor betting the company will fall, warned that the bank faces a billion-pound liability from mis-sold car finance deals. When a company is under financial pressure and then blames AI for job cuts, it is worth asking whether AI is the real reason or a more palatable explanation for cuts that equity markets will reward regardless of cause.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Close Brothers adds to the AI-washing evidence base: companies under separate financial pressure citing AI for cuts that serve balance-sheet rather than efficiency objectives.

First Reported In

Update #3 · The AI jobs data contradicts itself

Yahoo Finance / AJ Bell· 28 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Close Brothers cuts 600, blames AI
Close Brothers illustrates how financial pressure and AI attribution blur together in corporate restructuring announcements.
Different Perspectives
Barclays
Barclays
Barclays economist Pooja Sriram flagged a 28,000-a-month bleed in finance and information roles the same week Microsoft disputed that AI drove its own 4,800 cuts. The bank treats Challenger's AI-attribution share as a lagging indicator against faster erosion visible in raw labour-market data.
European Commission
European Commission
Brussels deferred the Digital Omnibus's Annex III employment-compliance deadline from 2 August 2026 to December 2027, even as California advanced three binding AI-hiring bills the same week. The 17-month delay leaves EU workers without the algorithmic-hiring safeguards the regulation already promises.
OpenAI
OpenAI
OpenAI proposed a 5% US government equity stake worth $42.6bn, structured as a public wealth fund modelled on the Alaska Permanent Fund, with Sam Altman pitching it directly to Trump, Bessent and Lutnick. The offer pre-empts Sanders' rival one-time 50% AI-stock tax, which has not yet reached committee.
India's IT and outsourcing sector
India's IT and outsourcing sector
BAT's transfer of 3,500 roles to Accenture on 29 June fits a delivery model Indian IT firms increasingly run: consultancies win Western contracts, then execute through offshore centres. The sector expects more Fit2Win-style transfers, not straight redundancies, as employers absorb AI without cutting outsourced headcount.
European Trade Union Confederation
European Trade Union Confederation
ETUC says the Council's shift from 'ensure' to 'support' in the AI-literacy duty, confirmed in the Digital Omnibus's final adoption on 29 June, is a collapse of the legal threshold, not a drafting tidy-up. It expects EU workers to face AI-driven hiring and monitoring decisions with a statutory right to explanation that exists in name only.
British American Tobacco's Fit2Win workforce
British American Tobacco's Fit2Win workforce
BAT is cutting 9,000 roles under Fit2Win, transferring 3,500 to Accenture rather than making them redundant, to reach roughly £500m in AI-driven savings by 2027. For affected staff, that distinction decides whether they keep a job at all, just not at BAT.