Skip to content
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
22MAR

Close Brothers cuts 600, blames AI

1 min read
12:34UTC

A UK banking group announced layoffs one day after a short-seller flagged a billion-pound liability. AI was named as a reason. It may not be the real one.

PoliticsAssessed
Key takeaway

Close Brothers cited AI for job cuts one day after a short-seller flagged a billion-pound liability.

Close Brothers, a UK banking group, announced 600 job cuts on 23 March as part of an £85 million cost-cutting programme, citing AI deployment and offshoring. 1 The announcement came one day after a short-seller warned of a £1.2 billion hit from the car finance scandal.

AI and offshoring appear in the same sentence. When companies face financial pressure from multiple directions, AI becomes a convenient explanation for cuts that serve other purposes, precisely the pattern the "AI-washing" thesis predicted .

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Close Brothers is a UK bank that announced it was cutting 600 jobs, naming AI and offshoring as the reasons. The announcement came one day after a short-seller, an investor betting the company will fall, warned that the bank faces a billion-pound liability from mis-sold car finance deals. When a company is under financial pressure and then blames AI for job cuts, it is worth asking whether AI is the real reason or a more palatable explanation for cuts that equity markets will reward regardless of cause.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Close Brothers adds to the AI-washing evidence base: companies under separate financial pressure citing AI for cuts that serve balance-sheet rather than efficiency objectives.

First Reported In

Update #3 · The AI jobs data contradicts itself

Yahoo Finance / AJ Bell· 28 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Close Brothers cuts 600, blames AI
Close Brothers illustrates how financial pressure and AI attribution blur together in corporate restructuring announcements.
Different Perspectives
Oxford Economics
Oxford Economics
Concluded AI's role in recent layoffs is 'overstated,' finding companies are not replacing workers with AI at scale. Identified slowing growth, weak demand, and cost pressure as the actual drivers.
Ambrish Shah, Systematix Group
Ambrish Shah, Systematix Group
Warned AI coding tools will erode Indian IT firms' labour-arbitrage growth model by reducing enterprise dependency on large vendor teams.
South Korean government
South Korean government
Enacted the world's second comprehensive AI law, choosing an innovation-first framework over prescriptive employment protections — a deliberate contrast to the EU's regulatory approach.
Corporate executives executing AI-driven cuts
Corporate executives executing AI-driven cuts
Frame workforce reductions as existential necessity. Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek and Block CEO Jack Dorsey both described AI adoption as a survival imperative, with equity markets reinforcing the message through immediate share-price gains.
Chinese government (Wang Xiaoping)
Chinese government (Wang Xiaoping)
Positions AI as a job-creation engine to absorb 12.7 million annual graduates and offset 300 million retirements, directly contradicting domestic economist Cai Fang's warning that AI job destruction precedes creation.
Klarna and companies reversing AI cuts
Klarna and companies reversing AI cuts
Klarna's public reversal — rehiring the human agents it replaced with AI after customer satisfaction collapsed — validates Gartner's prediction that half of AI-driven service cuts will be undone by 2027.